Tuesday, 10 July 07, 10:23 PM · Comments(11)
I only have one thing to say. Brazilians all over the world better be thanking 3 things. God, the goalpost, and, what my Uruguayan friend calls, some "crooked"
referees.
First off, if God wasn't watching over the Brazilians, they probably wouldn't have advanced. Secondly, if it wasn't for the goalpost, yes, the Brazilians wouldn't have made it to the final.
When Pablo Garcia, the former Madrid player, struck the ball for his penalty, I thought Uruguay had knocked off Brazil and made it to the final. But, thanks to the goalkeeper's best friend, they didn't.
And when the last pk was taken by a Uruguayan, who had to make the penalty in order to keep his country alive, AS Roma goalkeeper, Doni, had taken at least 3 steps out of his goal, before the ball was kicked.
That is a no-no, according to FIFA rules and regulations. So, I thought that Uruguay would have to retake the penalty, but the head ref said no. That moment, reminded me of the 2005 Champions League Final between Liverpool FC and AC Milan. One of Milan's players had a to take a penal, but, then Liv'pool keeper, Jerzy Dudek, had also taken 3 steps off his goal-line to block the penalty taker and make Liverpool the Champions of Europe for 2005.
What are your thoughts on this whole situation?
It's unfortunately true, in the end Uruguay shot it's self in the foot. But at least I hope people recognize this team and La Celeste as a good squad, they deserve it.
Ok. how about the penalty kick on vagner love in the first half minutes before brasil`s first goal? it would be 2-0. game is over.. as we say here in Brazil "IF" doesn`t play ball. The fact everybody
knows...
Goalpost? Did you forget that Brazil hit the goalpost twice? Pablo Garcia wouldn´t even need to kick his penalty if the goalpost was so Brazilian-friendly... And yes, Lugano (as always) made a
penalty on Vagner Love when it was 1-0 and another one over Vagner when Julio scored the 2nd goal.
The pk's to the goal post were not favor towards the goalie, but the lack of accuracy from the shooter. As far as the last kick goes, the shot may have gone to hte middle because the goalie spooked
the shooter by moving, causing the centralized shot, as opposed to the side.
Pablo Garcia wouldn't even need to kick his penalty if the goalpost was so Brazilian-friendly This is true. but, the fact of the matter is, the 2 Brazilian kickers DID hit the post. All Pablo had to
do was hit the net and Uruguay advance. But, that was UNLUCKY!!
I'm Brazilian, but my favorite player is Lugano! Could you imagine how I feel? I think both teams deserved win that game, but Brasil win! Penalty decision is more luck than hability. I'm very happy
with the game result, but I know what Doni did, I know the judge helped us, I know that Doni frusted the chance for Uruguay in Lugano´s penalty. But what we can do now? I think the game was great,
both teams played very well, actually Uruguay had played better. Has nothing that qe can do, now we have to twist, and wait for the final game.
Those that keep harping on the supposed Lugano foul/penalty, watch the play over and you'll see they should give Vagner an Oscar for that dive! Lugano really should have hit him, then he'd have
something to cry about.
I did'nt get to see the game because the stupid tv station (univision) that I've been watching all the games on, did'nt show it, last nite . I called my nephew yeasterday in uruguay he was all
convinced we were going to win.I hate to loose on pks
11 Comments · Add yours
Brazil can certainly thank a somewhat "blind eye" that was turned on Doni in their favor. But Uruguay could have sealed it up with the earlier missed PK.
It could have been by some kind of grace or will that they advanced, but I felt that Ruiz and his team did a pretty fair job calling this one (much to my surprise). No game changing penalties or red
cards. Is the error of omission (i.e. not calling questionable fouls) better than the error of addition (calling things that are not fouls)? I would argue yes. Regarding the final penalty shot, I
would say that the steps off the line is one of the looser FIFA rules/regulations that is not only very difficult to enforce without really messing with the player's heads but also not a
game-changing rule in the first place. He had the rest of the goal to shoot for and chose nearly dead-center. Such is football. Plus it could be argued that the ref had plenty of other chances to
give an advantage to Brasil that he didn't. I think it was fair.