Saturday, 22 December 07, 06:07 PM
This will sound especially bizarre after Portsmouth's humbling at the hands of Liverpool today, but Harry Redknapp was the right man for the England job. That's not to say that Fabio Capello won't
do well, but Harry had everything that was needed. He's great at getting the best out of what he has, he's worked with several of the players before, and he likes his teams to attack.
Sven Goran Eriksson was by far the most successful manager that England have had in recent years. Critics complained that he had failed to win England a major tournament, but then who had? They're
a side that haven't done fuckall since 1966, and the unfortunate Sky and Premiership hyperbole seems to have players and fans alike believe that the England squad is far better than it actually
is.
What ultimately really got the fans on Sven's back, was that England didn't play exciting football. They played result-oriented football, to the best of their abilities, and when faced with the
world's best, like Brazil, Portugal and France, they couldn't survive. They always managed to compete though, and were never massacred, but the players weren't upto the level of technique where
Sven could trust them at.
This year, after City's rousing start to the season, the press asked Sven why England never played like that, and his simple and honest answer was that he never had a player like Elano as England
manager. That's the basic truth to all this - the present England players are lacking heavily in technique and skill, and so they have to be organised in a way that compensates for this, and that
requires a tremendous amount of humility, which the players simply don't have.
Capello is an angry man with a big personality, and he will make sure the players do what he says, and he won't mince his words. But if people thought that Sven's brand of football was uninspiring,
they will be in for even worse with Capello. His only focus is winning, and he doesn't care about style or substance or anything as long as he gets 3 points.
He's also a stereotypical Italian tactician, and his lack of English is going to hamper his communication to his players. Additionally, he's never managed an international team, so it will be
interesting to see how he does with England, since he only has the players together for a few days every month. My guess is that he'll strip the play down to the bare essentials, and the fans won't
like it. Neither will the media, and that battle is one of the biggest for an England manager. If the media starts to get on your back, the wheels might just start falling off the wagon.
Now Capello is a strong enough character to deal with all of this, but he's going to have to conduct quite a reality check once he starts. In his first spell at AC Milan, he had Van Basten,
Rijkaard, Maldini, Gullit and co. Then at Real, he had Raul, Morientes, Suker and Mijatovic. Back at Roma, he had Totti, Batistuta, Cassano, Tomassi and Emerson. At Juventus, he had Buffon
Ibrahimovic, Vieira, Del Piero, Emerson, Camoranesi and Nedved. And then back at Real, he had Raul, Ronaldo, Beckham, Cassano, Robinho, Van Nistelrooy, Gago, Guti, and Casillas. That is an awesome
array of talent to always have been supported by.
Who does he have with England? Well... Wayne Rooney, Steven Gerrard, and Joe Cole. Gerrard as well is probably just a little bit overrated, but that's essentially the issue. Rio Ferdinand can play
a bit when he's not busy with orgies and booze, and Peter Crouch can be a jack-in-the-box, but essentially the England squad is full of very, very limited players, and has no goalkeeper (surely,
only the most deluded of fans still believe that Paul Robinson is "world class?).
At his previous clubs he's always been able to request the players that he wanted, but international management doesn't have transfer feers unfortunately. Granted, that's more than OK if you're the
manager of Brazil, or Italy or France, but not quite with England. The core group of England players might be as talented as some top sides, but in terms of depth, there's not much. So the key is
getting the best out of the players that you have, and that is where Harry Redknapp is excellent.
OK, he is a bit of a wheeler-dealer on the transfer market, but those who've followed him for many years know that it's not what he relies on. Constant injury problems, lack of funds, and switching
of clubs mid-season have shown that he organises the team according to the players he has, and can innovate very well. He's never won anything major, but he's shown he can beat the best, and play
attacking football.
Also, across the various clubs he's been at, he's had Michael Carrick, Joe Cole, Jermain Defoe, Glen Johnson, David James, Peter Crouch, Theo Walcott, Rio Ferdinand, Anton Ferdinand, Frank Lampard
and Sol Campbell playing for him. That's the core of the England squad right now, and he knows them in-and-out. Plus, he's been a Premiership manager for years, and knows the rest of the players
quite well. This is as opposed to Capello, who admittedly says he doesn't know too much about the Premiership, and intends to do homework with watching loads of videos.
Having said all of this, Capello and Redknapp are in two completely different classes of manager. One could take the Italian comparison, and compare Capello to Lippi (two highly succesful,
legendary club managers), and Redknapp to Donadoni (canny managers, who have managed small clubs, and not won anything, but know how to organise teams).
I'm in favour of Redknapp in this case, because he would have cost a fraction of what Capello did, and would not have put the pressure on England in such a big way. Now, they've gone for one of the
biggest names available, on one of the biggest salaries available, and if they still fail, they one of football's proudest nations will end up as a laughing stock. It's a miracle they aren't
already, because anyone who hired Steve McLaren should be.
Sunday, 14 October 07, 03:18 AM
After years and years of being shunted around from position to position - a compromise between trying to help his beloved Aston Villa's threadbare squad, and trying to work out the best way to break into the England side - Gareth Barry seems to have finally found some stability and recognition. An essential figure in England's "renaissance" (well, with regards to the Euro 2008 qualifiers at least), Barry looks to have established himself as Steven Gerrard's partner in central midfield. He was excellent in their 3-0 win over Estonia today, but of course the true test will come in midweek, when they play Russia away on the infamous "plastic pitch". But over 3 games, it's been a case of so-far-so-good for the affable Villa man, and today he was picked ahead of Frank Lampard.
His case has been helped by a few factors of course - both Owen Hargreaves and Lampard have had injury problems, and Martin O'Neill's success with the Villa side has helped him boost his profile. But there's also the fact that the general public have finally noticed that Frank Lampard is overrated and fat. And that apart from running a whole lot, making square passes, and talking in a funny accent, Owen Hargreaves doesn't offer much else.
Barry on the other hand has a calming effect in midfield. He's disciplined, tidy, and has that oh-so-rare quality of being both English and left-footed. It's improved the balance of the midfield, and allowed Steven Gerrard to get forward and do what he does best - be brilliant. Of course I'm not suggesting that this has suddenly solved England's problems, but it has given them some clarity in the short-term. They need to focus on qualifying, and they have the system to do it now, especially because they aren't be facing any teams of real quality. Once they come up against Argentina, Brazil, Portugal, and so on, they will need to have a better philosophy in place than "Give the ball to Stevie".
Anyhow, back to Barry!
Now 26, he broke into the England squad at the age of 19. It was the Kevin Keegan era, and he played on the left of a back three. He was the much vaunted, left-footed, ball-playing centreback that England had apparently been crying out for so many years. At Villa he had broken through as a centre-half, and it was in that role that he had impressed Keegan, who decided to fit him into his system in a way that would allow some freedom and options to pass and distribute. His full debut came against France, and after the game the plaudits poured in - the new Stuart Pearce, Paolo Maldini, blah, blah, blah. The English media didn't disappoint, throwing up it's usual elixir of superlatives and hyperbole. Although in truth, Barry had played very impressively.
And that was more or less the end of that. Kevin Keegan's Three-At-The-Back turned out to be rubbish, and was on it's way, and then Kevin Keegan turned out to be rubbish, and he was on his way. In came the bog standard back four, and with Barry primarily being a centre-back, he found no way into the team ahead of Adams, Keown, Ferdinand, Woodgate and so on.
Valiantly, he began to play as a left-back for his club, both out of necessity and a wish to further himself with England, who had been crying out for a decent LEFT-FOOTED left-back for years, but instead had to make do with Phil Neville basically not really doing anything apart from running up and down, being ugly and giving away penalties. Unfortunately for Barry, this was around the time that Ashley Cole and Wayne Bridge both emerged, and that was really the end of his left-back story.
Fast forward a few more seasons, and our friend Gareth has now pushed on up into mid-field. Although struggling at first, he raises and adapts his game, and though he's not the quickest or most skillful player, he does a fantastic job of understanding what is needed in the wide positions, and does very efficient, very good work. Now if England had a paucity of decent-left backs, then they had (and still have) an absolute vacuum of left-sided midfielders. Under Sven Goran Eriksson's reign as manager, they used Paul Scholes, Frank Lampard, Steven Gerrard, Owen Hargreaves, Wayne Rooney, Joe Cole, Trevor Sinclair, Danny Murphy, Darius Vassell, Phil Neville, and yes, EVEN Emile Heskey in that role. Apart from Joe Cole in flashes, and Wayne Rooney because of his obvious talents, none ever really looked any good, and so surely the left-footed Barry would get a look in. His crosses would be appreciated by the likes of Crouch, Heskey and Rooney. His natural left-footedness and width would have added balance to the midfield, and made things less congested in the centre, and his defensive nous would have allowed Ashley Cole to rampage forward like he did for Arsenal. But inexplicably, Barry never got a chance.
Ever the good pro, he never once complained. Not when he was left out as a centreback, not when he was left out as a left back, and not when he was left out as a left midfielder. He never complained when he was shunted around from position to position at Villa, and despite his talent and ability, he never once wavered in his commitment to them. And somehow throughout all of this, he managed to play well too. Sparkling in rare patches, he mostly drew attention with his shocking consistency. He almost never had a bad game, and almost always had a good game. He was not a matchwinner on most days that he played, but always pitched in with hardwork and his fair share of assists, and added goals to his game as well.
Finally, under Martin O'Neill last year, it seemed like Barry had given up on England. To add to this, he had started to play in the centre of midfield, sitting tidily in front of the back four, passing the ball around, and the arrival of Nigel Reo-Coker this past summer only served to cement this as his permanent position under O'Neill. Barry as ever didn't object, did his job, and did it well. And herein lies the great irony in all of this; if England were overloaded with centre-halves when Barry was making the breakthrough as a 19 year old, then they are now doubly overloaded with central midfielders - Hargreaves, Gerrard, Lampard, Parker, Carrick, Reo-Coker, Jenas, and so on. But somehow, despite being consistently overlooked by England when they needed him most, he has now made the breakthrough in a position where they need him the least. Well, "need" of course is open to interpetation.
It's sad that in 7 years he has only accumulated 13 caps for his country, when he should have had at least 30. But hopefully now we can finally say that he's arrived, and that people are taking notice of him and his ability. McLaren has been wearing a quite unsightly grin of late, to go with his amazing redness and thinning gingerness, and Barry has been a big part of that. Good luck Gareth!
Monday, 08 October 07, 01:42 AM
When Sven Goran Eriksson's
Manchester City announced that they would be signing the Brazilian Elano, most thought of him as being a gamble - an undoubtedly talented player, but one who would be expected to struggle, and take
time to adapt to the Premiership (as many Latin Americans do). His dalliances with injuries, and slightish frame were also factors for doubters, as was the fact that he was basically untested at
the top level apart from some apperances for the Brazilian national team.
Well, the outcome so far has been quite spectacular. Right from the start of the season, Elano has been the focal point of City's attacking play, and a big part of everything good that they're doing. He was instrumental in setting up their first goal of the season, and currently leads the Premier League's assist charts with 5 assists (tied with Cesc Fabregas). He's also scored 3 goals, and as a result, Man City have been flying - they're currently third in the league, 3 points behind leaders Arsenal, and just 1 behind bitter rival Man United (but with a game in hand).
Elano's story is an interesting one. Born in Iracemápolis, São Paulo, he joined Santos, and was an instrumental part of their title winning sides, although very much an unfeted player. Whilst Robinho, Diego, Ricardinho and Alex stole the limelight, Elano went about doing his work efficiently, achieving a reputation as a talented goalscoring midfielder with 32 goals in 3 years. Whilst his more "illustrious" teammates took off to Real Madrid and Porto, Elano saw a good opportunity to further his career at Shakhtar Donetsk, one of the many newly-rich clubs in Eastern Europe, that played in the Champions League, and where he wouldn't be too homesick with a host of other Brazilians around him. Although he struggled at first, he worked his way into the team, and became the first Ukraine-based player to be called up to the Brazil national squad when Dunga took charge. Elano started off very brightly, scoring against Argentina at Arsenal's Emirates Stadium. He has since been a fixture in the Brazil squad, although not always in the first XI.
Elano's excellence as a player has a lot to do with his versatility and intelligence, as well as his willingness to work hard. While he is not Gennaro Gattuso (thankfully), he doesn't shirk his share of the work, and is more than happy to put in tackles, and stand up to them as well. Most Man City/Premiership fans might only have seen him operating on the right or in a free role, but I had the chance to watch him train and play up-close at this year's Copa America, and he's perfectly capable of playing on the left, in the middle or in a wing-back or full-back role. Had Maicon not managed to recover from a shoulder injury at the Copa, then it's very likely that Elano would have deputised. And nevermind his passing, movement. intelligence and workrate, he is also a very, very good finisher. In training, he would slot the ball crisply past the keeper almost 9 times out of 10, producing exactly the kind of finish that the situation demanded. Man City have signed the "complete" attacking midfielder.
No one should get too carried away though - the English winter still awaits (although Elano is more than well prepared for this after his sojourn in the Ukraine), but there is also the surprise factor that is still working in his favour; once opponents get to know him better, they will start to target him, and people like Robbie Savage, Lee Bowyer, and Frank Lampard are more than happy to "strategically" kick lumps out of certain key players.
Elano is lucky to have a manager of Sven's intelligence. One of the reasons that the team has gelled well, and that the new recruits have settled in almost immediately, is that Sven knows how to arrange teams to maximise their strengths, and minimise their weaknesses. He's well educated with the English game, and the first thing he did was to pair Michael Johnson and Dietmarr Hamann together in central midfield. Both of them are fighters, good defensive midfielders, and organisers and passers. When there's a fight to be had in the middle of the park, they take care of it, and when going forward, they keep it simple and basically give Elano a platform on which to showcase his talent, which he has done in abundance.
On Premier League approves 7 substitutes