Search OleOle:
enesptfritderuzhkoja Sign Up Log in
Home > FIFA > UEFA > The FA > Premier League > Tottenham > Harry Hotspur > Some Prematch Prattle And Swipe At Huddlestone

« Previous Post Next Post »

Some Prematch Prattle And Swipe At Huddlestone

Tuesday, 27 January 09, 12:34 AM · Comments (463)

pav
 
 
 
I love you too, but I can't talk now...
 
 

 

Our current custodians of the double poly mesh face a challenge and a half tonight. And I'm not talking about choosing a safe route home if this all goes mammery glands up.

I'm becoming a stuck record, much as I was towards the end of Jol's tenure. And with similar complaints. Our midfield lacks sufficient resolve or wit. Our forwards are isolated and are getting fed crumbs.

The only descernable tactical difference between Jol and Redschnapps is that Arry subs his unserviced strikers considerably sooner than the Dutchman.

Pavyluchenko's goal against Manchester United was magnificent.  As a Tottenham player his confidence is growing game by game and beginning to match his CV. His touch is tip top and his will to shoot on sight a delight. But he needs the damn ball.

So to the challenge. Huddlestone has been pillored and rightly so. He was empolyed to play for 90 minutes on Saturday and bar one decent pass to the Russian he couldn't be bothered. His contribution against Burnley was worse. Does he want out? If so, get an agent and get going, sunbeam. We need players who are commited or at least more accomplished than you at feigning it.

This will be unpalatable for some, but in plain language, Spurs need to stop being mugged off by chancers like Huddlestone.

It was said you wouldn't have sent a dog out in the 'orrible climatic conditions at Turf Moor last week. Yet Tommy's shirt at full time would have passed the Daz Doorstep Challenge. 

'But he's only eleven, Harry, get off his back!'

How long have we been listening to this? Please tell me you have something more substantial than 'he'll come good eventually' as a reply to his recent dysmal and damaging performances.

In case it had escaped anyone's notice, we are now in the unenviable position of playing Premiership newbies Stoke at home tonight. Both teams in the relegation zone and no one betting their life savings on a Tottenham win.

We need consistancy and we need commitment. And now.

Look at Arry's criteria in his purchasing strategy. 'Are you definitely gonna get out there and play?' What a disgrace that he'd have to ask.

My mind keeps returning to Arry's initial comments when he arrived at The Lane. 'There's alot of talented footballers at Spurs and maybe that's the problem.'

Arry's assesment wasn't based upon him wanting to turn us into Bolton. He was just concerned our 'offer' as a team was paper thin. How right he was.

Bet wise there are huge prices available. We're 6/1 for 1-0 win. Boyles Sports are offering 30/1 for 1-0 HT, 2-1 FT which seems friendly enough of them.

Apologies to readers for the Pav clip. Repetitive viewing for me has virtually induced some class of motion sickness.

Like this blog? Help spread the word: Facebook Diggicon Reddit Delicious

Posted by HarryHotspur | Comments (463)

463 Comments · Add yours

Trembly
1. Trembly Wrote: | 07.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

i love you... you love me... we're one happy family. or so sings that annoying purple dinosaur. one thing that is a cert is that if we can service our pav, then as a team we'll start hitting a purple patch.

Tommy if you hit the pitch tonight, just try and emulate a Rambo will ya and get the f**k stuck in there.

I predict...a riot

Raf_THFC
2. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 07.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Totally agree on Huddlestone - he seems to believe the press when they drool over his occasional skills as a "quarterback"....

With Zokora and Hudd combined we would indeed have a decent midfielder.

As it is we effectively take the field with 10 men when they both play. Move Corluka to DM now Chimbonda is back, who has pace more suited to the full back role. Corluka WANTS to play DM. He offers more than Hudd. Chimbonda and Bentley are a better combination (passing + pace.... if they perform) and may bring out the best in Bentley. An overlapping WB with pace who can cross.

Lennon offers more on the left than Bale for the time being.



Soon Palacios will displace Zokora.

worriedyid
3. worriedyid Wrote: | 08.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ain't it about time we hammered someone about 4-0.....cometh the hour!!

simianSpur
4. simianSpur Wrote: | 08.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Huddlestone... oh Huddlestone, how I could have loved thee.
But you walk about the pitch like you're half asleep.
I want my midfielders to have effort that is perennial,
but you're obviously not our midfield general.
You can float the ball as if in space,
shoot like a rocket.. but check your waist.

anyway.

yes his time is up, definItely ..

but redknapp proved himself in the market yesterday. players we need. players with experience.

now. hows about a nice cuppa tea?

Raf_THFC
5. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 08.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

And before the wise-arses kick in as per usual :D , yes I know Chimbonda and Palacios can't play today. So Jenas and Zokora it is in midfield.

Now all we need is a decent LB, with Corluka and Chimbonda acting as cover for King/Dawson/Woodgate.

Yidfield_General
6. Yidfield_General Wrote: | 08.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I hope that Johnny gets off the bench again. I was impressed with his graft against the Mancs. Would like to see him on the left wing. I refuse to write Thudd off just yet. He was instrumental in our best spell so far this season and I don't think Luka has been any more consistent than him. OK Luka runs about loads more but he also loses the ball plenty and I think the lack of balance in the team is much to blame for Luka, Thudd and our stikers' inconsistency. I am hoping that Wilson will be that balance!

Yidfield_General
7. Yidfield_General Wrote: | 08.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

*strikers*

Oops!

Jonny G
8. Jonny G Wrote: | 08.18GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Its unbelievable aint it! Hudd does have so much potential and it will be a shame to see him leave but the way he is playing at the mo- something aint right! If you wanna go Hudd, then go!!!! dont take the piss, its our club and alot of dedicated fans you are screwing around with here!

markxl1
9. markxl1 Wrote: | 08.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

still no left midfielder :?

glenwasgod
10. glenwasgod Wrote: | 08.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Granted he has been poor in the last couple of games and he looks unfit/immobile/lazy, but he played well for a few games when Harry first joined and he can play well in the right role with the right partner. The combo of Hud and Zokora absolutely doesnt work - Hud needs to play with someone who can get forward, not someone who also sits back and I cannot imagine trying to develop a partnership with someone who has no football brain. He might look a completely different player alongside Palacios. If Hud leaves us, sods law states that he'll turn into a great player at another club where their system/midfield partnership suits him.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
11. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 08.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I'm still not sure my heart can stand another Spurs game... here's hoping we can deal with the Delap throw-ins (don't give too many away in the 1st place) cos they'll get us on the set pieces.
Otherwise, with Pav up front and a few decent balls into him, you never know. Ah... that would mean some passing from midfield...

sadspur
12. sadspur Wrote: | 08.33GMT | Jan 27, 2009

"Any player coming to Spurs, whether he's a big signing or just a ground staff boy, must be dedicated to the game and to the club. He must never be satisfied with his last performance, and he must hate losing."

somebody read this to the lads for F***sake

Yidfield_General
13. Yidfield_General Wrote: | 08.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to sadspur:

"Any player coming to Spurs, whether he's a big signing or just a ground staff boy, must be dedicated to the game and to the club. He must never be satisfied with his last performance, and he must hate losing."

somebody read this to the lads for F***sake

Words of a legend!
Too true!

They should all be made to read about Billy Nic when they sign and not be allowed to kick a ball until they have passed a stringent test on his footballing philosophy!

COYS!

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
14. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 08.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to sadspur:

"Any player coming to Spurs, whether he's a big signing or just a ground staff boy, must be dedicated to the game and to the club. He must never be satisfied with his last performance, and he must hate losing."

somebody read this to the lads for F***sake

Along with Danny's reply to Jimmy Anderson, "What exactly do you mean by a long ball? How does a long ball roll?"

Blanchflower
15. Blanchflower Wrote: | 08.44GMT | Jan 27, 2009

HH 'damaging' is the right word. Not the time to blood in a player for 9 years.

p.s. That looped footage of Pavs celebration gives me the heebie-jeebies, looks like he's saying "wait till I see you Blanchflower, your arse is mine."

nicktheyid
16. nicktheyid Wrote: | 08.52GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Raf_THFC:

And before the wise-arses kick in as per usual :D , yes I know Chimbonda and Palacios can't play today. So Jenas and Zokora it is in midfield.

Now all we need is a decent LB, with Corluka and Chimbonda acting as cover for King/Dawson/Woodgate.

Give O'hara a go at left back.
Hasn't he played there for the U21's?

Raf_THFC
17. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 09.03GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to nicktheyid:

Reply to Raf_THFC:

And before the wise-arses kick in as per usual :D , yes I know Chimbonda and Palacios can't play today. So Jenas and Zokora it is in midfield.

Now all we need is a decent LB, with Corluka and Chimbonda acting as cover for King/Dawson/Woodgate.

Give O'hara a go at left back.
Hasn't he played there for the U21's?

Seem to remember him playing LB for us a few times, might have been moved to LB from LW during the game though. Wasn't entirely convincing at the back I seem to remember, but then neither is BAE. Gunter used to play LB for Cardiff I think...but then Harry doesn't seem convinced on him being anything more than back-up from his comments yesterday.

johnnycheshunt
18. johnnycheshunt Wrote: | 09.03GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Gonna be a right ole ding dong this evening. I hope they've each had a glass of fighting water before taking the field. ESPECIALLY HUDD. If he's playing. I doubt he is though. I say give Les Dawson the captaincy.

TMWNN
19. TMWNN Wrote: | 09.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Blanchflower:

HH 'damaging' is the right word. Not the time to blood in a player for 9 years.

p.s. That looped footage of Pavs celebration gives me the heebie-jeebies, looks like he's saying "wait till I see you Blanchflower, your arse is mine."

=D Scary.

Look again. After the rest of the players have celebrated the goal and are returning to their positions, big T finally makes the 20 yard hike.

Can't see him starting tonight.

Also can't see (or think about) anything other than a win tonight.

COYS!

Blanchflower
20. Blanchflower Wrote: | 09.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to Blanchflower:

HH 'damaging' is the right word. Not the time to blood in a player for 9 years.

p.s. That looped footage of Pavs celebration gives me the heebie-jeebies, looks like he's saying "wait till I see you Blanchflower, your arse is mine."

=D Scary.

Look again. After the rest of the players have celebrated the goal and are returning to their positions, big T finally makes the 20 yard hike.

Can't see him starting tonight.

Also can't see (or think about) anything other than a win tonight....

Be fair, the lad had just kicked the ball. Probably went to the dugout to take on liquids ;)

The_Fox
21. The_Fox Wrote: | 09.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes; two strikers who can make surging runs and hold up the ball - i.e. most likely a little/large partnership. And contrary to popular belief, Hudd does not need to play alongside a DM - he needs to be partnered with any type of aggressive midfielder who likes a tackle. If we're happy to provide those things, Hudd will be a star. If we persist in playing a no-run midfield (O'Hara and Bentley on wings with Zokora anchoring, for example), Hudd will be a burden. But please don't slate the boy for being what he is.

Sid Trotter
22. Sid Trotter Wrote: | 09.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Thudd and Medders in the reserves for the next game or two

Cappucini
Gunter - Dawson - Wooders - BAE
Corluka
Jenas - Zokora
Bentley Bale
Pav

slim
23. slim Wrote: | 09.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Hudd seems one of many at the moment
who are not overly bothered about our
plight at the wrong end of the table.
A lot of our "luxury" players will be
gone in the summer if Harry is in charge...

Pav is sending a message to Taarabt,
"if you come on pass the round thing
to me"

Raf_THFC
24. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 09.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

Seems to me he can only play as part of a three in central midfield.

He offers nothing apart from sitting deep and pinging long balls (for a few minutes per game then he disappears as soon as they stick a midfielder who can tackle to close him down, at which point he losses possession and the opponents have a free run on goal with all our players deep waiting for that magic long ball....)

No No NO,
Hudd must go.

but then, anyone able to name a team in the premiership who would actually want him - continental football is the way forward for him.

The_Fox
25. The_Fox Wrote: | 09.21GMT | Jan 27, 2009

By the way, when is the Modric slating scheduled for? I'd like to join in on that one. I mean, 16 million to have a dwarf who can't run or tackle in central midfield? Huddlestone only cost an eight of that...

HarryHotspur
26. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 09.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't think the subtleties of team contstruction come into it.

Hoddle was hardly a hard tackler. But in the words of Ron Manager, aka Paul Whitehouse, he " ...always had a bit of time, make a little bit of space, look up, bang. And you know he could put it on a postage stamp from 40 yards. Mmmmmmmmm...."

Huddlestone needs to do more than keep us waiting.

We're properly in the poo poo and I'm afraid to say his shirt has to given to someone who will play us out of it.

As I said, he doesn't even look like he's trying.

I'm not suggesting we sacfrice glory - as I fail to see what glory Tommy's brought us this season.



nicktheyid
27. nicktheyid Wrote: | 09.23GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Raf_THFC:

Reply to nicktheyid:
Reply to Raf_THFC:

And before the wise-arses kick in as per usual :D , yes I know Chimbonda and Palacios can't play today. So Jenas and Zokora it is in midfield.

Now all we need is a decent LB, with Corluka and Chimbonda acting as cover for King/Dawson/Woodgate.

Give O'hara a go at left back.
Hasn't he played there for the U21's?

Seem to remember him playing LB for us a few times, might have been moved to LB from LW during the game though. Wasn't entirely convincing at the back I seem to remember, but then neither is BAE. Gunter used to play LB for Cardiff I think...but then Harry doesn't seem convinced on him being anything...

I just feel there's nothing to lose by trying a natural left footer, who's a committed 100%tackler with the ability for a decent pass.
And he can strike a sweet ball!
Bale may well develop into something great, but I don't think it will ever be as a top L.B.
However with him in L.M. and having a man like O'hara behind him, he could develop the confidence to perform the way he did when he first arrived at the Lane.

perrymann
28. perrymann Wrote: | 09.28GMT | Jan 27, 2009

8) Their u r Harry bringing down a SH*T STORM of Huddlestone Chronic Syndrome Bloggers who last week had Bent Chronic Syndrome, how u can blame 1 player for a bad team effort when u could see he had to play more defensive due to others ie MODRIC etc not doing their job, beats me. The pick of Alnwick in goals was a disaster against Burnley where Hudd gave 2 sublime passes that should have turned into goals.Pav had a lot of ball before scoring.Against Manure, again a game played in our own half, Hudd had an assist.?The game is about a TEAM+ a COACH effort.Manure held their shape(we were headless chickens) and this passing team caught us with a ball over the top bypassing midfield, so please stop this picking on 1 player for a sh*t team effort 8O I sit and wait with my Brolly up :D

The_Fox
29. The_Fox Wrote: | 09.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Raf_THFC:

Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

Seems to me he can only play as part of a three in central midfield.

He offers nothing apart from sitting deep and pinging long balls (for a few minutes per game then he disappears as soon as they stick a midfielder who can tackle to close him down, at which point he losses possession...

The best formations for Hudd would probably be 442 or 352. As for your nightmare scenario with "all our players deep waiting for that magic long ball", I can only assume that you're exaggerating in order to make a point. Which I'm not taking, by the way. But you're right in saying that Hudd would do well in continental football - particularly La Liga.

HarryHotspur
30. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 09.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

By the way, when is the Modric slating scheduled for? I'd like to join in on that one. I mean, 16 million to have a dwarf who can't run or tackle in central midfield? Huddlestone only cost an eight of that...

You can have some Modric tough love now. I though he was playing for Man Utd on Saturday he passed to them so often.

In his case, I do feel that the dynamics of the team formation come into it. He is an entirely different player.

He does need a good DM around him.

He has Zokora.

The real difference in my attitude to Modric is that he's only 'not been getting it quite right' since the beginning of the season.

How long has Tommy been a player with great potential?

I would flog most of our midfield. Most games they cause more problems than they solve.



HarryHotspur
31. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 09.33GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to perrymann:

8) Their u r Harry bringing down a SH*T STORM of Huddlestone Chronic Syndrome Bloggers who last week had Bent Chronic Syndrome, how u can blame 1 player for a bad team effort when u could see he had to play more defensive due to others ie MODRIC etc not doing their job, beats me. The pick of...

You're right of course. It's not just Tommy. I wouldn't blame a single player for a collective performance, nor did I. But I would say he needs to urgently buck his ideas up.

HarryHotspur
32. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 09.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Raf_THFC:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

Seems to me he can only play as part of a three in central midfield.

He offers nothing apart from sitting deep and pinging long balls (for a few minutes per game then he disappears as soon as they stick a midfielder who can tackle to close him down, at which point he losses possession...

The best formations for Hudd would probably be 442 or 352. As for your nightmare scenario with "all our players deep waiting for that magic long ball", I can only assume that you're exaggerating in order to make a point. Which I'm not taking, by the way. But you're right in saying that Hudd would do...

"But you're right in saying that Hudd would do well in continental football - particularly La Liga."

So let's sell him and wish him well as he goes. His inability to do more in the Premiership is killing me.

We need all hands on deck.

No exaggeration.

He looks like he'd prefer a manicure.


NordicYid
33. NordicYid Wrote: | 09.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I have to say again what I have been saying earlier. Luka Modric is one of the best players in the world(in my eyes). But when our defence keep giving the ball away through long passes our midfield is always running in between never enjoying the ball. Our attacking problems is not due to our midfield, but our defence. When Dawson/woodgate kicks the ball as hard as they can upfield our midfield has no chance giving support to our strikers before our opposition has re-won the ball. Since our midfield now is in no-man's-land we are unbalanced and our opposition easily outplays us. In our good spell this season we used the same players as now, but we did not see the long passes.

Another thing. In football today you rarely score goals against a organized defence. Goals come from winning the ball in good positions and counterattacks or through set pieces. At the moment we do win the ball in good positions, but there is no desire to get forward. We keep jogging upwards afraid to lose "balance" backwards. As long as we can't score on set-pieces we have to take some chances going forward.

Raf_THFC
34. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 09.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Raf_THFC:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

Seems to me he can only play as part of a three in central midfield.

He offers nothing apart from sitting deep and pinging long balls (for a few minutes per game then he disappears as soon as they stick a midfielder who can tackle to close him down, at which point he losses possession...

The best formations for Hudd would probably be 442 or 352. As for your nightmare scenario with "all our players deep waiting for that magic long ball", I can only assume that you're exaggerating in order to make a point. Which I'm not taking, by the way. But you're right in saying that Hudd would do...

Yep exagerating just a little ;) but I think it illustrates my point that one Hoddlesque pass per game does not make a playmaker - would you run your heart out for a guy who is going to do it once in 90 mins (if at all?). Yet give away more chances by his sheer slowness.

Hence why he needs to play in a 5. To my recollection he was getting caught with the ball too many times as tried to load his right foot, which I believe is what got him dropped after our little renaissance under Harry.

markxl1
35. markxl1 Wrote: | 09.44GMT | Jan 27, 2009

it's never one player not at his best. it's ALWAYS 2 or 3 which brings the rest down a few notches. that's why harry is bringing in some new players. i think they will be motivated tonight.

4-1 to spurs, bentley first goalscorer.

The_Fox
36. The_Fox Wrote: | 09.44GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not denying you your right to criticize Hudd - because he does look bad out there at times. I'm just saying there's a reason he's looking bad. And Hoddle would too, btw.

The_Fox
37. The_Fox Wrote: | 09.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Raf_THFC:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Raf_THFC:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

Seems to me he can only play as part of a three in central midfield.

He offers nothing apart from sitting deep and pinging long balls (for a few minutes per game then he disappears as soon as they stick a midfielder who can tackle to close him down, at which point he losses possession...

The best formations for Hudd would probably be 442 or 352. As for your nightmare scenario with "all our players deep waiting for that magic long ball", I can only assume that you're exaggerating in order to make a point. Which I'm not taking, by the way. But you're right in saying that Hudd would do...

Yep exagerating just a little ;) but I think it illustrates my point that one Hoddlesque pass per game does not make a playmaker - would you run your heart out for a guy who is going to do it once in 90 mins (if at all?). Yet give away more chances by his sheer slowness.

Hence why he...

Huddlestone can play in a midfield of four, if that midfield is along the lines of Lennon, Bale, Huddlestone, Jenas - i.e. players who can and will run into space. Huddlestone will be a liability if played with Bentley, O'Hara and Zokora, since Bentley and O'Hara don't have the necessary pace and Zokora sits too deep.

tedzayid
38. tedzayid Wrote: | 09.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I think we should give Hudd one more chance and see how things go when Sgt. Wilson gets a game. If as promised he is the midfield enforcer we have all been crying out for then maybe just maybe Tommy will be free to do what we know he can do good without worrying about the things we also know he shit at!!

HarryHotspur
39. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 09.58GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

tedzayid
40. tedzayid Wrote: | 10.05GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Not fair to compare Hudd to Hodd. Tom can pass well and has an incredible shot on him but Hoddle was one of the most gifted footballers ever to play the game and it highly unlikely Tom or many others could ever match up to that.

TMWNN
41. TMWNN Wrote: | 10.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

HarryHotspur
42. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 10.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

:| Bloody right.

Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl.

The_Fox
43. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to The_Fox:

By the way, when is the Modric slating scheduled for? I'd like to join in on that one. I mean, 16 million to have a dwarf who can't run or tackle in central midfield? Huddlestone only cost an eight of that...

You can have some Modric tough love now. I though he was playing for Man Utd on Saturday he passed to them so often.

In his case, I do feel that the dynamics of the team formation come into it. He is an entirely different player.

He does need a good DM around him....

Yes, the dynamics of team formation most certainly come into it with Modric - the team must have been formed in either Spain or Italy for him to play well. He's just not cut out for the Premiership. Small players in the PL must have pace and great balance/low centre of gravity, or be deceptively strong. Examples of the first type are Lennon and Walc**t, while Scholes could be the poster boy for the second type. Modric has shown nothing at Spurs but fancy flicks in tight areas - he's unable to go past people, with his unique combination of snail-like speed and child-like body strength, he cannot pick out a pass or shoot from range, he cannot head or tackle. But he's sure got a fancy showreel on YouTube. And the fact that he orchestrated a win over England really propelled his hype over the top. If this boy was any good (like, 16 m good...), he would have been snapped up by one of the really big clubs in Europe.

Nunchucks
44. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.15GMT | Jan 27, 2009

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the added boon that he has dead ball ability and a cracking long range shot on him. He is also of limited pace.

But many of you are distracted by the fact that he's a 6'3" black guy, built like a Faces doorman. Ergo, expectations of enforcer type duties, and also run fast like 6'3" black guys normally do please.

Yes, he has been disappointing in the last couple of outings. Notwithstanding issues like dressing room confidence mashing, increasingly rare turnouts, and long absences aren't going to help.

Get a proper bit of midfielding coaching. Sort out the midfield balance, that will allow him to play his game.

I like him. He's a keeper.

The_Fox
45. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.16GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

He was most definitely fleeter of foot. Not so sure about a quicker thinker, though - I think Hudd's spatial awareness and general football intelligence just about matches a young Hoddle's.

Hoddle
46. Hoddle Wrote: | 10.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

The fox- The difference with Modric is that he's only been here five minutes and will be better next year,how long as huddlestone been with us and what has he actually done?just coz you fancy him or something doesn't make him good.The most important thing that you seem to be missing is that he isn't even trying and doesn't look bothered.Did you see the Burnley game?Get your head out of your arse.

The_Fox
47. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

No-no - he's a midfielder. ;)

Everything else - spot on!

The_Fox
48. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.21GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Hoddle:

The fox- The difference with Modric is that he's only been here five minutes and will be better next year,how long as huddlestone been with us and what has he actually done?just coz you fancy him or something doesn't make him good.The most important thing that you seem to be missing is that he isn't...

Infantile and homophobic? How very original...

TMWNN
49. TMWNN Wrote: | 10.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

The wally with the brolly; the reason Huddlestone, like Bent last week, is coming in for criticism is because he's playing like a cu@t. It's inexcusable and obvious.

If you want to point out other players that are under performing than do it.

elfranklins
50. elfranklins Wrote: | 10.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Uncle here!

I wonder if by chance that this Huddlemoan character could be related to an officer I once knew back in France 1941?

His name was Captain Thomas Muddlestone. Imposing figure, handsome, well built with a penchant for cross dressing on occasion.

Well it turns out that this Muddlestone was a gifted soldier when it was dry and the going fair to good at least, but any assault on well defended troops with the threat of mudd would have this chap reeling with fear.

Unable to take on a dug in pair German girl guides, he ran around in circles panicking in case the surrounding quagmire should stain his dandy suit and polished boots.

I was appalled at this humiliating display and had him put up against a wall and shot for flumaxing in front of the enemy....and do you know the funny thing is that after he was shot.....he neve did it again!

Must go! you know the drill. Marge has procured the use of 3 fine parisian whores for a spot of knitting, bun fighting and good all round chicken stuffing tom foolery.

Love Uncle!

Nunchucks
51. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

The wally with the brolly; the reason Huddlestone, like Bent last week, is coming in for criticism is because he's playing like a cu@t. It's inexcusable and obvious.

If you want to point out other players that are under performing than do it.

Okay.

Every single player except Lennon, Dawson, and Woody.

Hoddle
52. Hoddle Wrote: | 10.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Foxylady-You still miss the point.He isn't fucking trying!no matter what the potential(how long has he had that)you think he has, we need players that want to fight for the team ,not have little strops coz we signed another midfielder.

RunPigRun
53. RunPigRun Wrote: | 10.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

steve1987
54. steve1987 Wrote: | 10.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

He was most definitely fleeter of foot. Not so sure about a quicker thinker, though - I think Hudd's spatial awareness and general football intelligence just about matches a young Hoddle's.

I didn't think I'd ever hear someone say that Hoddle was faster than anyone.
Though, I did see Glenn score a goal running from his own half and then rounding the GK.

HarryHotspur
55. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 10.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

"I like him. He's a keeper"

Redeployment. I like it.

Return of the Living Dead
56. Return of the Living Dead Wrote: | 10.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Not related to this posting from Harry but...

Rumour has it more 'Former' Lilywhites are returning:

In Goal:

Erik Thorsvedt apparently passed the medical but thought the 1000 euros a week was too much and that there must be a catch and he never liked a catch did he?

Defence:
Dean Austin apparently was in deep conversation with ‘Arry after the win against Watford – apparently his ‘skills’ are more suited to defence than management?

Gudni Berggson – currently working as a lawyer for an Icelandic bank trying to get West Ham off the hook over the Tevez saga, although he is considering a great offer from Levy...

Garth Crooks – currently Chairman of the Grass Roots Advisory group – something we need to go back to

Midfield:
Darren Anderton – Pay as You Play – perhaps he could show Bentley how to cross the ball?

John Chiedozie – last seen running a childrens soft play area – so he will be used to ‘working’ with our current midfield force as I am sure they don’t practice on anything any more gruelling than a Bouncy Castle

Theo Foley – coaching in Greenwich so just across the river for him – working with kids so perhaps he can teach the Hudd how to get his shirt dirty

Danny Blanchflower – perhaps in bad taste and I profusely apologise now – but ‘Arry said we are down to our bare bones so chucking in a corpse may help?

Up front:
Johnny Brooks – ‘Arry sees this as a no brainer as Johnny is retired and living in Bournemouth and therefore he could jump in the car with ‘Arry, Joe and Kevin on the drive through up to the Lane

Jurgen Klinsmann – thought to be managing in Germany but actually running a car wash in Koln. The gimmick being they wash cars with the shirts of other ‘Jonny Foreigners’ – Alan Sugar has apparently invested in this company in a sort of Dragon’s Den approach...

Any others that are rumoured to be rejoining?

Prediction vs Stoke:
4-2

perrymann
57. perrymann Wrote: | 10.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to perrymann:

8) Their u r Harry bringing down a SH*T STORM of Huddlestone Chronic Syndrome Bloggers who last week had Bent Chronic Syndrome, how u can blame 1 player for a bad team effort when u could see he had to play more defensive due to others ie MODRIC etc not doing their job, beats me. The pick of...

You're right of course. It's not just Tommy. I wouldn't blame a single player for a collective performance, nor did I. But I would say he needs to urgently buck his ideas up.

8) Harry the coach picked the player twice."mugged off by chancers like Huddlestone"i got 2 say thats a Blatherin Arry type statement and in my opinion u r making a hero out of Pav while making a dog 2 kick out of The Hudd.This is Manna from Heaven for your Blog but i for 1 would like 2 see a more structered follow up from u 2 what i see as 1 of the harshest statements of any player 2 wear a Spurs Shirt. 8O

HarryHotspur
58. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 10.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Hoddle:

The fox- The difference with Modric is that he's only been here five minutes and will be better next year,how long as huddlestone been with us and what has he actually done?just coz you fancy him or something doesn't make him good.The most important thing that you seem to be missing is that he isn't...

Play the ball, not the man, dear. ;)

Nunchucks
58. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to RunPigRun:

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


Nunchucks
60. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.33GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

No-no - he's a midfielder. ;)

Everything else - spot on!

No-no - he's a midfielder?

I don't get it. Is that the punchline or the setup?

HarryHotspur
61. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 10.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to elfranklins:

Uncle here!

I wonder if by chance that this Huddlemoan character could be related to an officer I once knew back in France 1941?

His name was Captain Thomas Muddlestone. Imposing figure, handsome, well built with a penchant for cross dressing on occasion.
...

My first father in law was in the RASC. Run Away Someone's Coming.

Nunchucks
62. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

No-no - he's a midfielder. ;)

Everything else - spot on!

No-no - he's a midfielder?

I don't get it. Is that the punchline or the setup?

D'Oh! :?

RunPigRun
63. RunPigRun Wrote: | 10.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


PROPER coaching and man management maybe?

tedzayid
64. tedzayid Wrote: | 10.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Return of the Living Dead:

Not related to this posting from Harry but...

Rumour has it more 'Former' Lilywhites are returning:

In Goal:

Erik Thorsvedt apparently passed the medical but thought the 1000 euros a week was too much and that there must be a catch and he never liked a ca...

On John Chiedozie's first day at training with us he ran out onto the pitch jumped up, swung on the crossbar it broke and he knocked himself up. Peter (god dont you just hate my voice) Shreeves turned to the rest of the squad and was qouted as 'what the fuck have we signed here'. Certainly seems he would fit in with our current crop of underperforming troops!!

simianSpur
65. simianSpur Wrote: | 10.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

psssh, I like the guy when he has his game on but he is more inconsistent than even jenas. he can spray the ball about beautifully on occasion sure, even bullet home a couple of goals a season. but firstly ive never seen him as the athletic 6'3" type, no matter what his colour and secondly.. i really dont see fergie coming in with a 20 million bid for the fella anytime soon, he isnt a carrick replacement - but sure if everyone else is playing their game around poor little tommy then he'll be great. i'd prefer a player with similar attributes, but with some added dynamic traits.

tedzayid
66. tedzayid Wrote: | 10.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

OOPs.... knocked himself out even. Knocking himself up, that would be some fucking trick!!!!!

HarryHotspur
67. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 10.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to perrymann:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to perrymann:

8) Their u r Harry bringing down a SH*T STORM of Huddlestone Chronic Syndrome Bloggers who last week had Bent Chronic Syndrome, how u can blame 1 player for a bad team effort when u could see he had to play more defensive due to others ie MODRIC etc not doing their job, beats me. The pick of...

You're right of course. It's not just Tommy. I wouldn't blame a single player for a collective performance, nor did I. But I would say he needs to urgently buck his ideas up.

8) Harry the coach picked the player twice."mugged off by chancers like Huddlestone"i got 2 say thats a Blatherin Arry type statement and in my opinion u r making a hero out of Pav while making a dog 2 kick out of The Hudd.This is Manna from Heaven for your Blog but i for 1 would like 2 see a more...

I don't like digging these guys out, but too many (including me) having been carrying a torch for Hudd for too long.

I have also heard that his one one of the voices of discontent when it transpired that some new blood was about to hit the midfield.

At his best, his style and talent is what separates us from the mediocre.

At his worst, his blank look as he skips off in his unmuddied shirt will only speed up our demise.

Pav again is a proven player of International standing.

I am really concerned about our league position. I am really concerned about the attitude of some of the people we are pinning our hopes on.

There will be a fast turnaround or there will be casualties.

The time for indulgence has gone.

And if I'm percieved as harsh, very soon the mathematicians are really going to set about losing some friends around here.

HornchurchYids
68. HornchurchYids Wrote: | 10.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Steve 1987

Against Oxford. Gods last league game. Was in the Paxton for that one. I think he only touched the ball acouple of times. Genius!

As for Hudd. Drop him pronto! He's been shit. End of.

fatfish
69. fatfish Wrote: | 10.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

The problem we have is that we have too many incompatible midfielders, most of whom are only average premiership players. These are players that should be playing for the West Broms, Stokes, Boro's and Boltons of this world.

We know we should be much better than those teams around us, but because of our midfield, we are struggling. That's one of the main reasons why we are where we are in the table.

Modric, who I think shows the occasional glimpses of world class, has so far only looked good in a 5.

Hudd, who I am losing patience with, only looks class when he has time and space.

Zokora, who I have a lot of sympathy for as not one other midfield player can tackle, works so hard but is just not up to the level of a top class DM.

Jenas, great going forward, too inconsistent.

Lennon, so much better since 'Arry arrived. His delivery is getting better, just wish he would use his pace more often.

Bentley, showing more endeavour, energy and desire in last few games, work in progress.

O'Hara, I so want him to be good enough, but I don't think he is. Jury's out as long term option. Could he be coached into a LB.

Bale, I don't want to say it but he is still learning the game at this level. We need to perservere.

Taarabt, as Bale plus he has shown glimpses that he could go on to be one of the all time greats. But, unfortunately, it will probably be elsewhere.

Gio, 45 minutes of promise.

Sgt Wilson, I've been really impressed when I've seen him play for Wigan. Hopefully he will be the one that allows Modric to play in a 4.

When all are available, I would see the midfield as Lennon, Sgt Wilson, Modric, Bale.

Nunchucks
70. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to RunPigRun:

Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


PROPER coaching and man management maybe?

The portents do seem to point to that, don't they.

Mabbs
71. Mabbs Wrote: | 10.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

'This will be unpalatable for some, but in plain language, Spurs need to stop being mugged off by chancers like Huddlestone'.

Spot on with that Harry, the bloke is an absolute arsehole and reflects exactly what is wrong with Tottenham. I don't care if he's slow or has an off game but put some effort in ffs. That expression on his big face never changes, does my head in. He's capable of putting the ball on a penny from one end of the ptch to the other, anyone else blessed with that talent would probably be one of the best players in the country by now, he's just a lazy fat prick.

Let's all get behind the boys tonight because no matter what hang ups we have with select members of the current crop we need 3pts from this game, nothing else will do.

perrymann
72. perrymann Wrote: | 11.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to perrymann:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to perrymann:

8) Their u r Harry bringing down a SH*T STORM of Huddlestone Chronic Syndrome Bloggers who last week had Bent Chronic Syndrome, how u can blame 1 player for a bad team effort when u could see he had to play more defensive due to others ie MODRIC etc not doing their job, beats me. The pick of...

You're right of course. It's not just Tommy. I wouldn't blame a single player for a collective performance, nor did I. But I would say he needs to urgently buck his ideas up.

8) Harry the coach picked the player twice."mugged off by chancers like Huddlestone"i got 2 say thats a Blatherin Arry type statement and in my opinion u r making a hero out of Pav while making a dog 2 kick out of The Hudd.This is Manna from Heaven for your Blog but i for 1 would like 2 see a more...

I don't like digging these guys out, but too many (including me) having been carrying a torch for Hudd for too long.

I have also heard that his one one of the voices of discontent when it transpired that some new blood was about to hit the midfield.

At his best, his...

8) I have said before that Spurs r a conundrun a heart attack and a love all in 1.Yes the fight is on,no quarter given. :(

jolsgonemental
73. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


PROPER coaching and man management maybe?

The portents do seem to point to that, don't they.

Huddlestone is just one of many players that has stagnated at Spurs.

I could list the entire first 11 who would look twice as adept under say a Ferguson or ONeil.

fatfish
74. fatfish Wrote: | 11.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

SSN just reporting that Kenwynne Jones has signed a new 4.5 year deal at Sunderland. Just means we'll have to pay more in the summer. :(

HarryHotspur
75. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 11.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to fatfish:

SSN just reporting that Kenwynne Jones has signed a new 4.5 year deal at Sunderland. Just means we'll have to pay more in the summer. :(

LINK

jolsgonemental
76. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to fatfish:

SSN just reporting that Kenwynne Jones has signed a new 4.5 year deal at Sunderland. Just means we'll have to pay more in the summer. :(

but that would mean out ITK chums are completely wrong about him handing in a transfer request

Nunchucks
77. Nunchucks Wrote: | 11.42GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


PROPER coaching and man management maybe?

The portents do seem to point to that, don't they.

Huddlestone is just one of many players that has stagnated at Spurs.

I could list the entire first 11 who would look twice as adept under say a Ferguson or ONeil.

And that's my fear. Selling someone who had potential, and watching them blossom into quality in someone elses colours.

Why do I honestly believe that had we gone in for Ashley Young from Watford, we'd have an underachieving ne'er-do-well on our hands?

Who are we blaming here; the workman or the tools?

steve1987
78. steve1987 Wrote: | 11.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HornchurchYids:

Steve 1987

Against Oxford. Gods last league game. Was in the Paxton for that one. I think he only touched the ball acouple of times. Genius!

As for Hudd. Drop him pronto! He's been shit. End of.

Yes, I was there. What year was that?

jolsgonemental
79. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

Reply to jolsgonemental:
Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:
Reply to RunPigRun:
Reply to Nunchucks:

What is the difference between the gametype of Carrick and Huddlestone?

Carrick's game is almost entirely based on slowing the game down, and spreading the ball with accurate, visionary passing ability. He has limited pace.

Huddlestone does exactly the same, with the...

Agreed Nunchucks, but Thudd can't tackle for peanuts...

... then again if threw in a few pies with chips and tomato ketchup, he may well be persuaded.

Neither could Carrick. It's only since he's been at Old Trafford that he's suddenly been able to tackle and shoot.

Why's that?


PROPER coaching and man management maybe?

The portents do seem to point to that, don't they.

Huddlestone is just one of many players that has stagnated at Spurs.

I could list the entire first 11 who would look twice as adept under say a Ferguson or ONeil.

And that's my fear. Selling someone who had potential, and watching them blossom into quality in someone elses colours.

Why do I honestly believe that had we gone in for Ashley Young from Watford, we'd have an underachieving ne'er-do-well on our hands?

Who are we...

i thought the point of Redknapp was he could get the best out of players.

isnt that what you are supposed to get when you sign up Harry Redknapp? Without that what have you got?

A stroppy ginger gobshite way out his depth.

Sid Trotter
80. Sid Trotter Wrote: | 11.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Harry - the word 'prattle' is beginning to grate.

Can you use another word. People are using it to vent their spleen. Disgusting

9__37
81. 9__37 Wrote: | 11.50GMT | Jan 27, 2009

There seems some debate in the papers over which club in the Premier League is the biggest laughing stock. Yesterday it was us. Today it's Man Shitty. Tomorrow it will probably be Barcodes.

Personally, I recommend laughing stock as a hearty alternative to vegetable or chicken stock. It certainly adds character to my food, although it does taste funny, and I can't stop giggling while I digest it.

I would support any move to sell it in the cuisine section of the Spurs Shop, alongside bagels, matzos and schmaltz herring.

Raf_THFC
82. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 11.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to fatfish:

SSN just reporting that Kenwynne Jones has signed a new 4.5 year deal at Sunderland. Just means we'll have to pay more in the summer. :(

He's not worth the money they are talking about now in the summer, so guess he will never come to the Lane.

However, seems Fred is coming

LINK

Raf_THFC
83. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 11.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Hopefully that now means we can offload one of Comolli's most disastrous signings (Broken)

jolsgonemental
84. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

9__37
85. 9__37 Wrote: | 11.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

I saw Adriano lamped someone and got a three match ban. That's the spirit we want in the dressing-room, 'arry.

jolsgonemental
86. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.58GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to 9__37:

Reply to jolsgonemental:

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

I saw Adriano lamped someone and got a three match ban. That's the spirit we want in the dressing-room, 'arry.

Its Fred.

Wooohoooo!

im so excited i cant contain myself.

oh wait. yes i can. i mistook apathetic resignation for excitement again.

9__37
87. 9__37 Wrote: | 12.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to HornchurchYids:

Steve 1987

Against Oxford. Gods last league game. Was in the Paxton for that one. I think he only touched the ball acouple of times. Genius!

As for Hudd. Drop him pronto! He's been shit. End of.

Yes, I was there. What year was that?

You can see the goal here starting at 3.30. I was there, too. Took my breath away the way he ghosted through them.
LINK

The_Fox
88. The_Fox Wrote: | 12.05GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

While Cudicini could be a good signing (nobody's really seen him play for the last 4 years), the signings of Chimbonda and potentially Fred leave me gobsmacked. In the words of younger men than me - WTF?!

KOJAC
89. KOJAC Wrote: | 12.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

He was most definitely fleeter of foot. Not so sure about a quicker thinker, though - I think Hudd's spatial awareness and general football intelligence just about matches a young Hoddle's.

i've called my lawyers.......insulting ghod once is something....but twice.....and comapring him to to big tommy hud......get yourself a good defence......see you in court....and good luck

Nunchucks
90. Nunchucks Wrote: | 12.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to 9__37:

There seems some debate in the papers over which club in the Premier League is the biggest laughing stock. Yesterday it was us. Today it's Man Shitty. Tomorrow it will probably be Barcodes.

Personally, I recommend laughing stock as a hearty alternative to vegetable or chicken stock....

Yesterday it was us. Today it's us and Chelsy Davy. But tomorrow it will most likely just be us again.

KOJAC
91. KOJAC Wrote: | 12.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

Reply to 9__37:

There seems some debate in the papers over which club in the Premier League is the biggest laughing stock. Yesterday it was us. Today it's Man Shitty. Tomorrow it will probably be Barcodes.

Personally, I recommend laughing stock as a hearty alternative to vegetable or chicken stock....

Yesterday it was us. Today it's us and Chelsy Davy. But tomorrow it will most likely just be us again.

yes...they are even running ramos stories against us now.....like we would want him back.....i ask you.....

ramos wasn't greedy either was he....?

steve1987
92. steve1987 Wrote: | 12.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to 9__37:
Reply to jolsgonemental:

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

I saw Adriano lamped someone and got a three match ban. That's the spirit we want in the dressing-room, 'arry.

Its Fred.

Wooohoooo!

im so excited i cant contain myself.

oh wait. yes i can. i mistook apathetic resignation for excitement again.

What can I say but - Yabba-Dabba Do!

perrymann
93. perrymann Wrote: | 12.16GMT | Jan 27, 2009

8) Right said Fred hopping into bed
Right said Chimbo hopping in behind
Is Bent staying r is he straying
Tommy is in the doghouse. :D

The_Fox
94. The_Fox Wrote: | 12.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

He was most definitely fleeter of foot. Not so sure about a quicker thinker, though - I think Hudd's spatial awareness and general football intelligence just about matches a young Hoddle's.

i've called my lawyers.......insulting ghod once is something....but twice.....and comapring him to to big tommy hud......get yourself a good defence......see you in court....and good luck

I could use some time off, so I hope your team will be going for incarceration instead of damages. And whatever you'll be going for, you can be sure that I'll take Harry Hotspur down with me - he started the Hoddle comparisons. J'accuse!

Jeremy Paxton
95. Jeremy Paxton Wrote: | 12.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend some money on Shorey and perhaps Hunt as a left winger that is all about effort and playing there day in day out. How many transfer windows is that now without buying a left-sided midfield player? 8? 10?

Jeremy Paxton
96. Jeremy Paxton Wrote: | 12.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

My mistake - Andy Reid (!!!)

9__37
97. 9__37 Wrote: | 12.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to HornchurchYids:

Steve 1987

Against Oxford. Gods last league game. Was in the Paxton for that one. I think he only touched the ball acouple of times. Genius!

As for Hudd. Drop him pronto! He's been shit. End of.

Yes, I was there. What year was that?

It was 25th April 1987.

scar88
98. scar88 Wrote: | 12.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

i cant wait to see the pairing of palcious and jenus in midfield, palcious (i know ive spelt it wrong) might be exactly what jenus needs

The_Fox
99. The_Fox Wrote: | 12.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

HornchurchYids
100. HornchurchYids Wrote: | 12.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

We had a cup final to look forward to then as wll.

jolsgonemental
101. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 12.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to scar88:

i cant wait to see the pairing of palcious and jenus in midfield, palcious (i know ive spelt it wrong) might be exactly what jenus needs

surprisingly you have managed to spell 'it' right.

Jeremy Paxton
102. Jeremy Paxton Wrote: | 12.37GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an England international left winger, so if he sees J2S as a non-option I suppose we give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

I'd be tempted to give Gio a go in place of a woefully off form Modric....

The_Fox
103. The_Fox Wrote: | 12.50GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

steve1987
104. steve1987 Wrote: | 12.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Ok, I was in my usual seat in the new West Stand.

7screws
105. 7screws Wrote: | 13.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

apparently we've found a cure for bales lack of preformance 8O

LINK

KOJAC
106. KOJAC Wrote: | 13.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

so 4-5-1 tonight then.... 8O ...with a defensive plan to contain the might of stoke...

that should do the trick....coys

elfranklins
107. elfranklins Wrote: | 13.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to elfranklins:

Uncle here!

I wonder if by chance that this Huddlemoan character could be related to an officer I once knew back in France 1941?

His name was Captain Thomas Muddlestone. Imposing figure, handsome, well built with a penchant for cross dressing on occasion.
...

My first father in law was in the RASC. Run Away Someone's Coming.

..Yes yes provided that the running away is in posession of a football headed in the direction of the opposition goal..Marvelous.

Otherwise it's a last cigarette!

Uncle

elfranklins
108. elfranklins Wrote: | 13.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to elfranklins:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to elfranklins:

Uncle here!

I wonder if by chance that this Huddlemoan character could be related to an officer I once knew back in France 1941?

His name was Captain Thomas Muddlestone. Imposing figure, handsome, well built with a penchant for cross dressing on occasion.
...

My first father in law was in the RASC. Run Away Someone's Coming.

..Yes yes provided that the running away is in posession of a football headed in the direction of the opposition goal..Marvelous.

Otherwise it's a last cigarette!

Uncle

Sorry i really must get an 'Old War Veteran lock' on my mac!

Trouble is of course old Uncle is a master of infiltration and sabotage!

thfcwaynethfc
109. thfcwaynethfc Wrote: | 13.15GMT | Jan 27, 2009

A few things that are worrying me

1) Pavyluchenko -i love him -i think he is the best finisher in the prem, he is tsarting to settle and i think will be a big asset for us. What concerns me is that i think Harry doesnt rate him - defoe brought in, big jones bid, fred as well as admitting he would take keane back.If we were to have 4 strikers e.g. pav defoe keane fred - we would be back to same situation as we were a year ago,as we cant keep them all happy. I hope Harry sees the Pavyluchenko i see and hope he is not contemplating just making him a squad player.

2) Hudd - his performances have been poor, im not taking excuses about who he had in midfield, he is a prem league footballer, his job is too win ball and pass it - even this is a struggle for him.

3) Modric -i am really worreid about him, there have been flashes of brilliance but these flashes are very rare. i can not see him in a 4-4-2 in the prem league so i dont know what we are going to do with him. i dont think he is a harry redknapp player and i dont think he is up to it physically in the prem league, again people will say he has had only zokora as a partner, however he has been getting enough of the ball and failing to do much with it.

4) Chim/Cud -good squad signings - both are reliable squad players at fantastic prices.

5) fred -if we get him on loan to end of season, he is then available on free, would give us a chance to see what he is like...however see point 1.

6) veloso - LINK - surely he would be a good signing for us, would be the final addition to our centre midfield, him in palacious would be very good. coould get rid of hudd/jj/zok and have mod/ohara in squad as well.

7) Stoke -we need a win simple as that. to be honest it has not struick me just yet that we are in a relegation battle and i hope it never does. we need a win tonight - my predicted team

cud
cor daw wood bae
bently zok mod len
pav defo

COYS

Gavin
110. Gavin Wrote: | 13.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Post 106, I think this could well be the reason for Bales lack of form, everytime I have been in the boxes at the lane recently, i always see Bale walking through the bar after the game... Always with at least 2 (usually 3) lovlies hanging on his arm! If he stopped telling them what a great footballer he is and started concentrating on becomming that great footballer, he must just turn into a decent player!

Nunchucks
111. Nunchucks Wrote: | 13.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to thfcwaynethfc:

A few things that are worrying me

1) Pavyluchenko -i love him -i think he is the best finisher in the prem, he is tsarting to settle and i think will be a big asset for us. What concerns me is that i think Harry doesnt rate him - defoe brought in, big jones bid, fred as well as...

The best finisher in the prem.


Aaaaaaand, back in the room.

thfcwaynethfc
112. thfcwaynethfc Wrote: | 13.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

carling cup final tickets,

if any1 like myself will not have enough membership points to attend, i have spent the last few days going through all the ticket websites.

the cheapest i have found is 350 euro for a ticket,

LINK

also, 2 people using yahoo have contacted me touting me a ticket for 450 quid, is it possible to report these people and if so who too and also if i report them and they get caught can i get the ticket for free? :)

amerispurs
113. amerispurs Wrote: | 13.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I don't know why we are slating Hudds when a unbalanced squad is what we are stuck with. I will point out and say that his effort is lacking and I will not disagree with anyone on that front. However, the likes of Hudds needs to be in a system where he has someone with cover that can tackle, not run about with pointless aggression. I do not understand why we have a slick long baller playing with a weak cover and a player such as Modric linking the play. Well, you can't link play if you loose the ball half of your time on it and create nothing. Modric gets lobbed over sometimes, but when he is back defending how can you find him? And when Adel or T-Bone as I like to call him gets the ball and dribbles his way to obscurity how can a passer like Hudds be affective? I recall seeing him wanting the ball from T-Bone many times against Manure and getting upset by it. Is he lacking will? I do not want to give up on Hudds yet nor will I slate him for his pitch performance when it comes to ability. However, I will agree and say that if he wants the ball like he seems to, he needs to get stuck in and do the dirty dirty with the size he was built with. And J2S needs more pitch time. Did not give the ball away and passed effectively, albeit backwards mostly, and fell back to tackle and helped with cover. A proper go under Harry is what the kid needs, viva la Mexico!

Bobgarty
114. Bobgarty Wrote: | 13.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to thfcwaynethfc:

A few things that are worrying me

1) Pavyluchenko -i love him -i think he is the best finisher in the prem, he is tsarting to settle and i think will be a big asset for us. What concerns me is that i think Harry doesnt rate him - defoe brought in, big jones bid, fred as well as...

Pavs stats are 12 goals in 24 appearences - now that is a pretty reasonable return. Just need to get him scoring in the league consistantly ... seem to remember a bulgarian who also started off a bit slow and had only scored 5 league goals by this stage of his first season ...

toddspur
115. toddspur Wrote: | 13.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

my team to samsh stoke;

Cuddlicini

Corluka, Woody, Dawson

Lennon, Bentley, Modric, Thudd, Baler

Pavlova, Defo

Subs; Zokora, Bent, BAE, Gunter, Alnwick, Jenas (if fit), JOH (if fit)

3-5-2; allows creativity in midfield without the need to have Zok charging around like a headless chicken. I also think Bentley playing a free role will see the best of him, especially alongside the vision of Modric

toddspur
116. toddspur Wrote: | 13.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

*samsh should be smash! 8O

The_Fox
117. The_Fox Wrote: | 13.46GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Team v Stoke:
Cudicini; Charly, Woody, Dawson, Ekotto; Lennon, Jenas, Hudd, Bale; Pav, Defoe.

amerispurs
118. amerispurs Wrote: | 13.46GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Just read this from that other spurs site, LINK

DiscoSpurs
119. DiscoSpurs Wrote: | 13.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I think I'll just endorse what the majority of the posters on here are saying - we've given it long enough waiting to hope that some of those with 'potential' come good. Huddlestone is a prime example.

Also, I get why some people are talking about systems to make more of Hudd's ability but the simple fact remains that he is half of a midfield player and without greater presence and athleticism the guy is totally out of place in the premiership. I might be proven wrong, but I don't think he'd make it anywhere else in the Premiership.

Also, i don't think it's helpful to start talking about moulding systems around certain players. That only makes sense if a.) The player is world-class and has proven it; Hudd does not get anywhere near that and b.) you're not struggling against relegation. To my mind, Harry is doing exactly the right (if unglamourous, unTottenham) thing. The teams that will survive are those who can guts it out. Do Wigan and co build their systems around players or do they win cos they guts it out? And yeah - before people say "we're not Wigan!", we all need to wake up. You're right, we're a whole lot shitter currently.

The final nail in that argument remains that Man Utd and god forbid, the league winning arsenal teams - have/had a great physical presence about them, plus superb skills, and yes they sometimes moulded around world-class individuals. But they did all three things together.

Time for Hudd to go, and whilst we at it, the rest of the midfield who in more or less the same shape have been one consistency throughout the last few desperate years. Yeah, I'm looking right at Zakora and Jenas.

There's no alternative to gutsing it out from here. We fight or we sink, no space or time for fancy shit, so let's forget it for now.

Sid Trotter
120. Sid Trotter Wrote: | 14.02GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I once had an uncle that lived in Stoke. He was a bit odd but a real battler. Only saw him once. Went potty in the end apparently

Nunchucks
121. Nunchucks Wrote: | 14.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of mediocrity is lunacy.

thfcwaynethfc
122. thfcwaynethfc Wrote: | 14.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

agreed...there are other players who are not good enough

in that order

1) zokora
2) bent
3) jj

the following players have underperformed, though would keep as they are either young/adopting

bale
modric
giovanni
bently

Raf_THFC
123. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 14.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to amerispurs:

Just read this from that other spurs site, LINK

That has to be one of the most diabolically poor pieces of analysis I have ever seen. total waste of time and bandwidth...

@116 - if we had that midfield with 3 at the back we'd never have the ball, apart from picking it out of our net.

Blanchflower
124. Blanchflower Wrote: | 14.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Firstly, please can somebody tell me who J2S is? Surely not Gio?

Secondly, re: left winger, it's Downing in the summer. If that much ain't clear, then Spurs will now push for fourth spot and humiliate the Mancs at Wembley.

toddspur
125. toddspur Wrote: | 14.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

again, the voice of reason.....Thudd needs a run of games just like every other player. he would start almost every game for me, save for tricky away ties where the Zok can do his sniffing out

corlukas-veruka
126. corlukas-veruka Wrote: | 14.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to toddspur:

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

again, the voice of reason.....Thudd needs a run of games just like every other player. he would start almost every game for me, save for tricky away ties where the Zok can do his sniffing out

If Huddlestone needs a run of games loan him out to a championship club. He is like a giant fanny in the middle of the park

juergensdive
127. juergensdive Wrote: | 14.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Alright you 'orrible lot! Sit up straight and...and fold your arms at the back! Let's be 'aving a bit of positive thinking! A sound thrashing of Stoke, tonight, will give the whole squad a different image...including Thud! OK! OK! I know he's been playing like he's spent the night before servicing Amy Winehouse...but he ain't THAT bad! Let's get behind the lads!

Raf_THFC
128. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 14.49GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

mmmm

14 League games out of 22, 4 as sub. So he's started over half our league games this season. 7 Cup starts and 1 substitute appearance.

How many games does thudd need exactly until he makes a tackle and starts to show his 'real potential'?

103 games for us in total, 35 as sub. Sell him for whatever we can get.

Raf_THFC
129. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 14.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

And yes that should be he's played over half the league games.

Compare Dawson. In top form. Played 10 league games, 2 as sub, 10 cup games (1 as sub)

The_Fox
130. The_Fox Wrote: | 15.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Had some time to kill at work...

Points per league game played this season (starter and sub):
Hutton 1,75 (7p/4 games)
King 1,38 (18p/13 games)
O'Hara 1,33 (16p/12 games)
Ekotto 1,27 (19p/15 games)
Huddlestone 1,21 (17p/14 games)
Corluka 1,05 (20p/19 games)
Bentley, Modric, Pav, Bent 1,00
Gomes, Lennon 0,95 (21p/22 games)
Jenas 0,94 (17p/18 games)
Woodgate 0,89 (17p/19 games)
Zokora 0,74 (14p/19 games)
Gunter 0,67 (2p/3 games)
Bale 0,31 (4p/13 games)
Dawson 0,30 (3p/10 games)
Giovani 0,17 (1p/6 games)

The_Fox
131. The_Fox Wrote: | 15.05GMT | Jan 27, 2009

So, to recap: Keep Dawson and Bale away from defence, and Zokora out of midfield. ;)

nicktheyid
132. nicktheyid Wrote: | 15.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to toddspur:

my team to samsh stoke;

Cuddlicini

Corluka, Woody, Dawson

Lennon, Bentley, Modric, Thudd, Baler

Pavlova, Defo

Subs; Zokora, Bent, BAE, Gunter, Alnwick, Jenas (if fit), JOH (if fit)

3-5-2; allows creativity in...

I think that 3-5-2 would freak Dawson out a bit, especially with Bale infront of him. A fit O'Hara would be a much better option and would allow Modric to do his stuff. The addition of Palacios instead of Thudd could see us, dare I say it, start WINNING in STYLE!! Although it may seem it, have not been on the Absolut yet.

steve1987
133. steve1987 Wrote: | 15.17GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Had some time to kill at work...

Points per league game played this season (starter and sub):
Hutton 1,75 (7p/4 games)
King 1,38 (18p/13 games)
O'Hara 1,33 (16p/12 games)
Ekotto 1,27 (19p/15 games)
Huddlestone 1,21 (17p/14 games)
Corluka 1,05 (20p/19...

Interesting stats - you don't work for the government by any chance?

TheSchoolboy
134. TheSchoolboy Wrote: | 15.18GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Had some time to kill at work...

Points per league game played this season (starter and sub):
Hutton 1,75 (7p/4 games)
King 1,38 (18p/13 games)
O'Hara 1,33 (16p/12 games)
Ekotto 1,27 (19p/15 games)
Huddlestone 1,21 (17p/14 games)
Corluka 1,05 (20p/19...

You can prove anything with statistics, 90% of all people know that...

The_Fox
135. The_Fox Wrote: | 15.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to The_Fox:

Had some time to kill at work...

Points per league game played this season (starter and sub):
Hutton 1,75 (7p/4 games)
King 1,38 (18p/13 games)
O'Hara 1,33 (16p/12 games)
Ekotto 1,27 (19p/15 games)
Huddlestone 1,21 (17p/14 games)
Corluka 1,05 (20p/19...

Interesting stats - you don't work for the government by any chance?

No, advertising - hence the blatant disregard for reality. ;)

steve1987
136. steve1987 Wrote: | 15.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

advertising = spin = government ..hmmmm

Spike
137. Spike Wrote: | 15.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

Yeah, a real puzzle, but it might have something to do with the blog's heading and the fact that he's playing like he couldn't give two hoots.

burstin
138. burstin Wrote: | 15.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Dear Harry...

Please could you start a new topic headlined
"West Spam Duxbury is a twat... we the supporters never wanted that neckless Bellamy anyway!"

Who else agrees that West Spam are muppets... Apparently Man City aren't rivals to them? hahaha... I would love it if West Spam were to finish 1 point below Citeh and get relegated... haha

Raf_THFC
139. Raf_THFC Wrote: | 15.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Matches in which both King and huddlestone started (8) - points won - 13 - avg = 1.625

Matches in which Huddlestone started, but not King (2) - points won - 1 - avg = 0.5

perrymann
140. perrymann Wrote: | 16.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

It's a conundrum to me why you've all got a hard on for Huddlestone right now.

He's barely played this season, yet we have managed to place our heads in the gaping maw of the lions mouth completely without his assistance.

To single out Huddlestone in a maelstrom of...

8) Todays Special=Chronic Huddlestone Syndrone followed by Sandras Bent/Bently Pie. As French upside-down Taart is off the menu a squeeze of Suckora on a Pav-alov-a could Stoke a fine thirst for a few Points (3) of wife beater Stella. 8O 8O

Sid Trotter
141. Sid Trotter Wrote: | 17.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ANyone got a link for watching the game tonight?

steve1987
142. steve1987 Wrote: | 17.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

well i usually just google something like free footy and like a genie from a lamp.......

vincenzo_spur
143. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 17.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

a stroppy brazilian upfront! thats will complete the triumvirate of a leftback at right back, and an old reserve goalkeeper that all relegation battlers need.

genius harry.

How can we NOT need a reserve keeper?

Gomes can't even kick at the moment... shall we just stick Alnwick in there and hope noone shoots? Who would you rather was in sticks to face Delap's throws tonight? Alnwick or Cudicini?

More to the point though, even if Gomes is fit in two weeks that is 6-9 crucial points potentially lost. We could be f##ked by then. Not a dig, just an observation.

Poshspur
144. Poshspur Wrote: | 17.23GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to toddspur:

my team to samsh stoke;

Cuddlicini

Corluka, Woody, Dawson

Lennon, Bentley, Modric, Thudd, Baler

Pavlova, Defo

Subs; Zokora, Bent, BAE, Gunter, Alnwick, Jenas (if fit), JOH (if fit)

3-5-2; allows creativity in...

Bale and Thud in the same side is truely terrifying!
Cuddicini will get back to good form but scares me for tonight, not that there's an option...generally tonight I'm windy.
Have we played any games in recent living memory that weren't must win?!
Pav will score and Defoe...2-0.
COYS

munso
145. munso Wrote: | 17.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Sid Trotter:

ANyone got a link for watching the game tonight?

if all else fails, try iraqgoals, ch 3 looks promising ;)

munso
146. munso Wrote: | 17.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Poshspur:

Reply to toddspur:

my team to samsh stoke;

Cuddlicini

Corluka, Woody, Dawson

Lennon, Bentley, Modric, Thudd, Baler

Pavlova, Defo

Subs; Zokora, Bent, BAE, Gunter, Alnwick, Jenas (if fit), JOH (if fit)

3-5-2; allows creativity in...

Bale and Thud in the same side is truely terrifying!
Cuddicini will get back to good form but scares me for tonight, not that there's an option...generally tonight I'm windy.
Have we played any games in recent living memory that weren't must win?!
Pav will score and...

FFS...this is Stoke...at home!

If we don't get 3 points tonight, we deserve to go down.

I'm all in for a 4-1 win tonight!

Grazza
147. Grazza Wrote: | 17.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

LINK

Excellent, takes me back to my law modules.

Nunchucks will guide you through the principles of libel and defamation of character :D

Grazza
148. Grazza Wrote: | 17.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Right,

I'm off to the game, SuperPav to the rescue!

COYLW!

vincenzo_spur
149. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 17.33GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to amerispurs:

Just read this from that other spurs site, LINK

It's a bit of fun but useless as far as drawing conclusions goes...

Too many variables not examined... i.e quality of opposition, home or away, other selection factors, how many are meaningless end of season games (i.e after winning cup last year), were any of these results altered by other unnacountables- like dodgy penalties or sendings off?

But i wasn't surprised to see jenas come out on top in terms of stats. Not too suprised anyway!

vincenzo_spur
150. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 17.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Blanchflower:

Firstly, please can somebody tell me who J2S is? Surely not Gio?

Secondly, re: left winger, it's Downing in the summer. If that much ain't clear, then Spurs will now push for fourth spot and humiliate the Mancs at Wembley.

J2S is indeed Gio...

As in Jonny 2 Siants.

vincenzo_spur
151. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 17.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Sid Trotter:

ANyone got a link for watching the game tonight?

type my p2p into google... sports... football... spurs vs stoke... there will be a link of options.

Usually about ten media player options which require no software to be downloaded (but which have the least quality of stream in terms of picture, delay and freezing)

Also sopcast ones (you can download sopcast from the software page).. this is pretty good option.

Veetle is the best for me, again on the veetle web page you will be able to download their flash player or whatever it is.

Finally, i often use TVU player which is pretty darn tootin' as well.

CaptainMabbsey
152. CaptainMabbsey Wrote: | 17.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to munso:

Reply to Poshspur:
Reply to toddspur:

my team to samsh stoke;

Cuddlicini

Corluka, Woody, Dawson

Lennon, Bentley, Modric, Thudd, Baler

Pavlova, Defo

Subs; Zokora, Bent, BAE, Gunter, Alnwick, Jenas (if fit), JOH (if fit)

3-5-2; allows creativity in...

Bale and Thud in the same side is truely terrifying!
Cuddicini will get back to good form but scares me for tonight, not that there's an option...generally tonight I'm windy.
Have we played any games in recent living memory that weren't must win?!
Pav will score and...

FFS...this is Stoke...at home!

If we don't get 3 points tonight, we deserve to go down.

I'm all in for a 4-1 win tonight!

Exactly. Given up on predictions and just said ''if we don't win, we deserve everything that's coming to us...''

...but i predict a win :?

steve1987
153. steve1987 Wrote: | 17.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

Reply to Sid Trotter:

ANyone got a link for watching the game tonight?

type my p2p into google... sports... football... spurs vs stoke... there will be a link of options.

Usually about ten media player options which require no software to be downloaded (but which have the least quality of stream in terms of picture, delay and freezing)
...

I haven't been to a match for years. I'd love to take my 7 year old, but living in Norfolk now it would cost about £100. It beats me how anyone can afford it these days.

Spurs8182
154. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 18.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I totally agree with your blog Harry you are spot on with your comments about Hudd. I couldnt agree with you more!! COYS LETS GET A WIN AND ABIG

cHUCK sPAMMER
155. cHUCK sPAMMER Wrote: | 18.05GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to HarryHotspur:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

:| Bloody right.

Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl.


"Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl"

Yes but maybe if he dressed like one? Imagine the labouring lump in a lillywhite mini dress running at the opposition. Might put them off a tad?

Just an idea.

KOJAC
156. KOJAC Wrote: | 18.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

you have got to laugh haven't you....already linked above i know...but..

LINK

i don't want levy's head on a plate or anything but apparently we didn't sell berba and keane to make money... 8O

good to see ramos setting the press straight too...

steve1987
157. steve1987 Wrote: | 18.10GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to cHUCK sPAMMER:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

:| Bloody right.

Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl.


"Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl"

Yes but maybe if he dressed like one? Imagine the labouring lump in a lillywhite mini dress running at the opposition. Might put them off a tad?

Just an idea.

Now you're taking the p*ss - "running at the opposition" ???

steve1987
158. steve1987 Wrote: | 18.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Earlier someone mentioned "Hoddle as fleet of foot" Just looked at some Glenn vid's and compared to Hudd he looked like that Bolt bloke.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
159. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 18.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to cHUCK sPAMMER:

Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:

Look, it's all very simple. Huddlestone is a playmaker. He needs certain things to thrive: a team that plays possession football, defenders that are comfortable on the ball and do not resort to hoofing it any chance they get; fast midfielders who make themselves available for deep and wide passes;...

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

:| Bloody right.

Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl.


"Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl"

Yes but maybe if he dressed like one? Imagine the labouring lump in a lillywhite mini dress running at the opposition. Might put them off a tad?

Just an idea.

Some girls are quite good ;)

steve1987
160. steve1987 Wrote: | 18.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:

Reply to cHUCK sPAMMER:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to HarryHotspur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to HarryHotspur:

'Huddlestone is a playmaker.' I'd like to think so too but watching him suggests otherwise.

Huddlestone has been royally indulged by Spurs on the strength of our desire for a player who can produce the sweetest of touches in both his passing and his shooting.

I don't...

The subtleties of team construction? Surely, you're pulling my chain? You don't think it mattered that Hoddle had runners on the wings and up front? That the best strike partnership for Hoddle were two bolts of lightning who could run on to those passes of his (Archibald and Crooks)? Now, I'm not...

Hoddle was fleeter of foot and a quicker thinker, no? :?

...and playing over 20 years ago when the game was slower.

The comparisons between Huddlestone and Hoddle need to stop. They do Hoddle a disservice.

:| Bloody right.

Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl.


"Huddlestone needs to stop acting like a girl"

Yes but maybe if he dressed like one? Imagine the labouring lump in a lillywhite mini dress running at the opposition. Might put them off a tad?

Just an idea.

Some girls are quite good ;)

Yeah, washing up and ironing..............

SingletonSpur
161. SingletonSpur Wrote: | 18.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

If he's not gonna show passion when wearing the lillywhite he should take a walk right down the high road. Completely non-existant in last two games.

PLN
162. PLN Wrote: | 18.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I hope you all come out and apologise if he plays a blinder, seems that if a foreign import plays shit they are bedding in or getting used to the english game, but if one of our young players doesnt perform its because of a lack of passion desire and heart.... Oh and for the record, every spurs player put on a new shirt for the second half against burnley, which may go some way to explaining Hudds clean shirt, which if you ask me was a ridiculous way to make a point..... He didnt fall over therefore didnt try hard....? Dear oh dear, it's like being in the Park Lane on matchday sometimes here.

JonSpurs
163. JonSpurs Wrote: | 18.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

is tonights match on TV i will watch on iraggoals if needed but prefer a signal that doesnt die

vincenzo_spur
164. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 18.52GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to JonSpurs:

is tonights match on TV i will watch on iraggoals if needed but prefer a signal that doesnt die

Try post 151...

My Peer 2 Peer...

Look for sports section, then football tab.. when you find our game click on the little tele for streaming options. This site hosts links to many streams usually- although given that its a midweek game and united are playing there may not be many as usual.

JonSpurs
165. JonSpurs Wrote: | 18.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

Reply to JonSpurs:

is tonights match on TV i will watch on iraggoals if needed but prefer a signal that doesnt die

Try post 151...

My Peer 2 Peer...

Look for sports section, then football tab.. when you find our game click on the little tele for streaming options. This site hosts links to many streams usually- although given that its a midweek game and united are playing there may...

thnx

vincenzo_spur
166. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 18.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

steve1987
167. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.02GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

It's a big draw Spurs v Stoke..............

JONESY30
168. JONESY30 Wrote: | 19.02GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

try liveonlinefooty.com, there is a bit of software to download and it costs about four quid but its better than nowt. :P

steve1987
169. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to JONESY30:

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

try liveonlinefooty.com, there is a bit of software to download and it costs about four quid but its better than nowt. :P

4 quid I used to get in the Paxton for 50p!

steve1987
170. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to JONESY30:

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

try liveonlinefooty.com, there is a bit of software to download and it costs about four quid but its better than nowt. :P

Seriously - is it any good?

JONESY30
171. JONESY30 Wrote: | 19.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to JONESY30:
Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

try liveonlinefooty.com, there is a bit of software to download and it costs about four quid but its better than nowt. :P

Seriously - is it any good?

steve

yeah & no, it depends how many are streaming - loads of users can affect picture quality and cause buffering which can be frustrating but like i said its better than nowt!!

steve1987
172. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.10GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Looks like none of the big hitters are on here tonight, they must all have gone to the game.

JONESY30
173. JONESY30 Wrote: | 19.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Looks like none of the big hitters are on here tonight, they must all have gone to the game.

no they are all in a corner biting their nails at the thought of losing again to the mighty stoke city

steve1987
174. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to JONESY30:

Reply to steve1987:
Reply to JONESY30:
Reply to vincenzo_spur:

ok... my p2p is showing no games in epl for first time ive seen in two years...

strange...

still maybe worth a look just before K.O.. if anyone has other ideas please inform- i have no back-up plan

try liveonlinefooty.com, there is a bit of software to download and it costs about four quid but its better than nowt. :P

Seriously - is it any good?

steve

yeah & no, it depends how many are streaming - loads of users can affect picture quality and cause buffering which can be frustrating but like i said its better than nowt!!

Booger, that's 4 loaves of bread!

vincenzo_spur
175. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 19.16GMT | Jan 27, 2009

suppose so.. it is a home one after all... and i did see tickets were cheap. But wales to london on a tuesday evening... not tonight!

I dont fancy putting my card details into one of those sites- i may check it out in case they take paypal though.

I'd look at my p2p though. as i say, usually there are about ten to fifteen streams per game on there.

In fact apart from the two games ive got to and those on tv ive seen every spurs game since the cup final via it. and... its free...

veetle.com has a couple of sports channels. one may well show the game. or download tvu player from google search- that has hundreds of asian sports channels and runs as a stand alone player. worth a go- especially if you use p2p as some of the streams require software

JONESY30
176. JONESY30 Wrote: | 19.17GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

suppose so.. it is a home one after all... and i did see tickets were cheap. But wales to london on a tuesday evening... not tonight!

I dont fancy putting my card details into one of those sites- i may check it out in case they take paypal though.

I'd look at my p2p...

liveonlinefooty is paypal mate

vincenzo_spur
177. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 19.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

cheers

BruceCastle
178. BruceCastle Wrote: | 19.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Cudicini, Corluka, Assou-Ekotto, Woodgate, Dawson, Bentley, Zokora, Modric, Lennon, Defoe, Pavlyuchenko.

SUBS - Alnwick, Bale, Huddlestone, Gunter, Campbell, Taarabt, Rocha.

daytripper
179. daytripper Wrote: | 19.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I can't believe all the negativity towards Thudd. He gets moved into the DM slot, where he was our best defender in both of the last two matches. No, he doesn't run all over the pitch like Zokora chasing players everywhere and constantly overrunning plays, leaving the defence exposed, but what he does well is to stick to his position in the middle, just in front of the box, keeping attackers from running at our defenders, blocking shots (saved a goal with a block in the 10th minute against manure), and covering for defenders when they get beat in the box. Also, in the 3 seasons he's been here, I have never seen Thudd lose his mark in the box or get beaten on a header. He will never be an attacking mid, but as a DM, he is going to be a force for a long time in this league.

BruceCastle
180. BruceCastle Wrote: | 19.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

bale's not starting.....we have a chance!

2windy
181. 2windy Wrote: | 19.23GMT | Jan 27, 2009

LINK

But password protected, will work on it!!

BruceCastle
182. BruceCastle Wrote: | 19.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

iraqgoals
2500

Nick_The_Greek
183. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 19.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Looks like none of the big hitters are on here tonight, they must all have gone to the game.

Try Iraqi goals ,they are usually good

daytripper
184. daytripper Wrote: | 19.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to BruceCastle:

bale's not starting.....we have a chance!

I'd rather see Bale than Bentley on the left. Too bad, I though this was the game that was going to end the streak.

Nick_The_Greek
185. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 19.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to daytripper:

I can't believe all the negativity towards Thudd. He gets moved into the DM slot, where he was our best defender in both of the last two matches. No, he doesn't run all over the pitch like Zokora chasing players everywhere and constantly overrunning plays, leaving the defence exposed, but what he...

All we can ask is for the lad to try,and he is`nt is he.His time is up as far as I`m concerned

Poshspur
186. Poshspur Wrote: | 19.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Isn't Iraqi goals showing Villa or am I being a muppet?

steve1987
187. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to 2windy:

LINK

But password protected, will work on it!!

2500

vincenzo_spur
188. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 19.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

2Windy...

This seems to be pompey..

tottenhammannnnnnnnnnnn
189. tottenhammannnnnnnnnnnn Wrote: | 19.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

does anyone no the password for live footy then? whats iraq goals?

BruceCastle
190. BruceCastle Wrote: | 19.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

should be on channel 4 on Iraqgoals, but not usually until a few minutes before kick off.

BruceCastle
191. BruceCastle Wrote: | 19.37GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to tottenhammannnnnnnnnnnn:

does anyone no the password for live footy then? whats iraq goals?

google it

steve1987
192. steve1987 Wrote: | 19.37GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to tottenhammannnnnnnnnnnn:

does anyone no the password for live footy then? whats iraq goals?

I'll say it again - 2500, but it 's sh*t

2windy
193. 2windy Wrote: | 19.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Despite h**p://livefooty.doctor-serv.com/tue27.1/Tottenham_Stoke.html it does seem to be Pompey. Bugger.

Somebody must have this streaming!

m
194. m Wrote: | 19.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

LINK

password: 2500

vincenzo_spur
195. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 19.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ok...

iraq goals

type into google

click on link for channel three

password 2500

KOJAC
196. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.42GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to BruceCastle:

bale's not starting.....we have a chance!

harry is supersticious......he's not taking any chances

SingletonSpur
197. SingletonSpur Wrote: | 19.42GMT | Jan 27, 2009

iraq goals got it, and she's hot!

munso
198. munso Wrote: | 19.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Heres another link for ustream, if iraqgoals stacks it
LINK

daytripper
199. daytripper Wrote: | 19.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to daytripper:

I can't believe all the negativity towards Thudd. He gets moved into the DM slot, where he was our best defender in both of the last two matches. No, he doesn't run all over the pitch like Zokora chasing players everywhere and constantly overrunning plays, leaving the defence exposed, but what he...

All we can ask is for the lad to try,and he is`nt is he.His time is up as far as I`m concerned

If he wasn't trying, he wouldn't have run his tail back to make the two strong tackles against Burnley in the box that saved goals. In the last 2 games, he blocked more shots than anybody else on the squad and has thrown his body in front of 10x as many balls as Zokora.

Saying that, he (and everybody else on this team) really needs get better at defending up the pitch. Since Steed left, we haven't had a midfielder that does any defending in the middle of the pitch. Zokora, JJ, Bentley, Thudd all are terrible at this. That's where Palacios is going to be huge. He's one of the best in the prem at closing down in the midfield.

Tottenham maddddddddddddddd
200. Tottenham maddddddddddddddd Wrote: | 19.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

well done

KOJAC
201. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.46GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to munso:

Heres another link for ustream, if iraqgoals stacks it
LINK

yeah...i like ustream it usually has a decent enough piccy...

munso
202. munso Wrote: | 19.49GMT | Jan 27, 2009

bosnich...what a wanker he was!

Nick_The_Greek
203. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 19.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to daytripper:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to daytripper:

I can't believe all the negativity towards Thudd. He gets moved into the DM slot, where he was our best defender in both of the last two matches. No, he doesn't run all over the pitch like Zokora chasing players everywhere and constantly overrunning plays, leaving the defence exposed, but what he...

All we can ask is for the lad to try,and he is`nt is he.His time is up as far as I`m concerned

If he wasn't trying, he wouldn't have run his tail back to make the two strong tackles against Burnley in the box that saved goals. In the last 2 games, he blocked more shots than anybody else on the squad and has thrown his body in front of 10x as many balls as Zokora.

Saying that,...

Tom Huddlestone is not good enough,he just floats through games.I`ve seen enough of him now to say he`ll never make it at Spurs,he does`nt want it enough

2windy
204. 2windy Wrote: | 19.52GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Nice work Vincenzo =D

2DayArry
205. 2DayArry Wrote: | 19.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

myp2p.eu

Ginge1
206. Ginge1 Wrote: | 19.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Right lads less than 5 minutes to blast off, lets fuckin ave it, straight from the off, straight at em the first ball tackle won and won hard!

BIOYC

2DayArry
207. 2DayArry Wrote: | 19.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to munso:

Heres another link for ustream, if iraqgoals stacks it
LINK

linky
208. linky Wrote: | 19.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009


Good article re the Zok, Thud or Jenas debate:

LINK

2DayArry
209. 2DayArry Wrote: | 20.00GMT | Jan 27, 2009

what I was meant to say was HH hates people putting links to stuff like that but doesn't mimnd you talking about it FYI =D

KOJAC
210. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Ginge1:

Right lads less than 5 minutes to blast off, lets fuckin ave it, straight from the off, straight at em the first ball tackle won and won hard!

BIOYC

you on speaker phone again to the dressing room ginge....

Ginge1
211. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Ginge1:

Right lads less than 5 minutes to blast off, lets fuckin ave it, straight from the off, straight at em the first ball tackle won and won hard!

BIOYC

you on speaker phone again to the dressing room ginge....

I fucking should be, pansy twats!

Ginge1
212. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

GGoal!!!!

KOJAC
213. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

get the fuck in....

JonSpurs
214. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

FUCKING LOVE U LENNON

2DayArry
215. 2DayArry Wrote: | 20.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

yaaayaayayayayayayayayayayayaya :D

Poshspur
216. Poshspur Wrote: | 20.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Get it!
For once we score first and early!!!
Now then...

KOJAC
217. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

zokora makes another pass..... 8O

daytripper
218. daytripper Wrote: | 20.10GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I love the new and improved Defoe. The old Defoe would have shot from way out there, instead he makes a brilliant pass to setup the Lennon goal.

sid trotter
219. sid trotter Wrote: | 20.10GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to steve1987:

Looks like none of the big hitters are on here tonight, they must all have gone to the game.

Try Iraqi goals ,they are usually good

cheers nick, Iraq goals 3 - don't you just love lennon

KOJAC
220. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.10GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Poshspur:

Get it!
For once we score first and early!!!
Now then...

you not their tonight poshspur....?

steve1987
221. steve1987 Wrote: | 20.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

my link keeps stuttering - how is it for you?

JonSpurs
222. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

bentlys new hair cut and letting his balls hang to the right seems to be helping with his work rate i love the fact he tackled!

KOJAC
223. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to daytripper:

I love the new and improved Defoe. The old Defoe would have shot from way out there, instead he makes a brilliant pass to setup the Lennon goal.

it was defoe then....

KOJAC
224. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

my link keeps stuttering - how is it for you?

what do you want for less than 50p

Poshspur
225. Poshspur Wrote: | 20.18GMT | Jan 27, 2009

No Kojac annoyingly not tonight, babysitting my kids while ploughing through fine wines!!! My mates are there though lucky bastards...so far. I hope we tear them a new one...
COYS
Oh fucking iraqi goals has gone! How can I have trusted you, nnoooooooo

jazz15c
226. jazz15c Wrote: | 20.21GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Anybody got another site for the game??? I'm hastily downloading real player so i can listen to it on BBC Radio London, going fucking mad waiting for it to load!!! HELP!

DANNYBOY
227. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.21GMT | Jan 27, 2009

iraq goals has gone - whats happening???????????

2DayArry
228. 2DayArry Wrote: | 20.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

fuk yeah

knocsucow00
229. knocsucow00 Wrote: | 20.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Damn looks like there aren't any links to be found for the game.

If Spurs win...and no one is able to watch it...does it still count as 3 points?

JonSpurs
230. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

2-0? ive lost my coverage

Ginge1
231. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Goal!!!!!!!!!!

Ginge1
232. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.23GMT | Jan 27, 2009

right everyone off iraq goals, their must be too many of us on it so you lot fuck off so I can watch it! ;)

Ginge1
233. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.23GMT | Jan 27, 2009

*there

2windy
234. 2windy Wrote: | 20.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Only against Forest!

DANNYBOY
235. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

get the fuck in

2DayArry
236. 2DayArry Wrote: | 20.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

3-nil yaa aa a aa a a aa a

Ginge1
237. Ginge1 Wrote: | 20.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Jermaine Defoe - Yido! How could I doubt you JD!!! :o

munso
238. munso Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

3-0

DANNYBOY
239. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

3-0

JonSpurs
240. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

3-0 spurs!!!!!! dawson got the 3rd i dont have a clue who got the second COYS I FUCKING LOVE IT

DANNYBOY
241. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

dawson

AdolfGinola
242. AdolfGinola Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

his name was luka, he was a showman

munso
243. munso Wrote: | 20.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

iraqgoals back-refresh!

amerispurs
244. amerispurs Wrote: | 20.28GMT | Jan 27, 2009
2DayArry
245. 2DayArry Wrote: | 20.28GMT | Jan 27, 2009

should of ben 4

JonSpurs
246. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.28GMT | Jan 27, 2009

i love it when dawson scores

DANNYBOY
247. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

and pompey losing

KOJAC
248. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

typical...worse night of streaming best night for goals.....

did dawson nut one in for a corner....?
what did defoe do...?

DANNYBOY
249. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

they both scored ;-)

Poshspur
250. Poshspur Wrote: | 20.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to munso:

iraqgoals back-refresh!

Good work!
Come on you SPurs....nothing wrong with that tackle 8O

linky
251. linky Wrote: | 20.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009


this gives you quite quick written up to date info on match. on line tv crap.

LINK

DANNYBOY
252. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 20.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

i got audio but no pic on iraq
better than nothing.
fuck me we're 12th!!!!!!!!!

JonSpurs
253. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

short corner to modders flick to daws back of the net, i still havnt seen defoes but if spurs.co.uk is to go by it was a gd link up with pav

knocsucow00
254. knocsucow00 Wrote: | 20.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

We are in 127th min form!

Spurs8182
255. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

get in thia wonderfull!! about time!! =D

Spurs8182
256. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

this is wonderfull i meant!!

amerispurs
257. amerispurs Wrote: | 20.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

delayed, but with english commentary

LINK

knocsucow00
258. knocsucow00 Wrote: | 20.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I hope we keep going for goals, we need to be greedy and try to improve the point differential.

Hopefully some Gio in the 2nd half.

Poshspur
259. Poshspur Wrote: | 20.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Bring on Jimmy Tarbuck in the second half...
Shame that's Bentley out of the North London derby. Palacial can take his place...

munso
260. munso Wrote: | 20.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

i got audio but no pic on iraq
better than nothing.
fuck me we're 12th!!!!!!!!!

dannyboy - scroll down, its on the back up stream at the bottom 8O

lintal
261. lintal Wrote: | 20.41GMT | Jan 27, 2009

please some give a link the one you keep giving out doesnt work?

munso
262. munso Wrote: | 20.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to lintal:

please some give a link the one you keep giving out doesnt work?

LINK
or
LINK

lintal
263. lintal Wrote: | 20.44GMT | Jan 27, 2009

thanks alot munso a true gent coys!!!!!!!

JonSpurs
264. JonSpurs Wrote: | 20.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ohhh so close pavy

Spurs8182
265. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

what a goal that would have been from pav!!

Spurs8182
266. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

good half spurs, good half. COYS

KOJAC
267. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.49GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

i got audio but no pic on iraq
better than nothing.
fuck me we're 12th!!!!!!!!!

i just caught some highlights....so whats this about modric not playing in the middle... ;)

johnnycheshunt
268. johnnycheshunt Wrote: | 20.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I knew I'd seen improvement on Saturday. For everyone struggling with iraq goals, justintv have got a nice russian version.

Kluffah_Yid
269. Kluffah_Yid Wrote: | 20.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

these half time highlights are pure porn

jazz15c
270. jazz15c Wrote: | 20.52GMT | Jan 27, 2009

my word, we are playing some sexy stuff tonight!!! Awesome vision from Defoe to Lennon for the 1st, the 2nd was something beautiful!!!

robbieboy
271. robbieboy Wrote: | 20.54GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Hey guys, had the link on at Justin TV and Iraq... both are pony... Justin TV russian is a bit better. Head myp2p has legal injunction against it showing premier league... that's a disaster... anyone have any other alrenatives for schedules for sopcast etc? by the way... Pav and Defoe are oozing, and we are whipping this sorry bunch!

Spurs8182
272. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jazz15c:

my word, we are playing some sexy stuff tonight!!! Awesome vision from Defoe to Lennon for the 1st, the 2nd was something beautiful!!!

I agree second goal was great even zokora added a pass for it, i think he even started it lol.Modric is running the show hope he doesnt slow down second half.

fatfish
273. fatfish Wrote: | 20.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

2nd was a stunner.

Still worried though as only HT :o

Spurs8182
274. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 20.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

iraq goals is running fine with me, have another go its the screen at the bottom now.

steve1987
275. steve1987 Wrote: | 20.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to steve1987:

my link keeps stuttering - how is it for you?

what do you want for less than 50p

I'm in! missed all the goals . Had to sort out no1 son's printer for his homework. What happened to slate and chalk? bloody computers! or as we say in Norfolk compoooters...bootiful! get . please don't take you're foot off the gas..please just for once....do it for me!!!

jazz15c
276. jazz15c Wrote: | 20.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

fuck me, iraq goals showing a bio about the amazing bendtner scoring in the derby in 2007, KNOW YOUR FUCKING AUDIENCE!!!!

weejp
277. weejp Wrote: | 20.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

jazz15c
278. jazz15c Wrote: | 20.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ah, thats better, ginola one on now!!! Happy days, if they show that solo goal in the cup against barnsley my laptop screen may need a wash!!!

Spurs8182
279. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.00GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to jazz15c:

fuck me, iraq goals showing a bio about the amazing bendtner scoring in the derby in 2007, KNOW YOUR FUCKING AUDIENCE!!!!

There showing the legend Ginola now, get in!!

lintal
280. lintal Wrote: | 21.00GMT | Jan 27, 2009

ginola ginola ginola

Spurs8182
281. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to weejp:

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

Yeah true, then they want you to fuvking donate for a load of fucking pony lol.

YidArmy
282. YidArmy Wrote: | 21.03GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Were the Sweeney son, and we havent had any dinner!!

weejp
283. weejp Wrote: | 21.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Donate me bollocks!

I'm not happy with the free service, I'm hardly gonna give them money to feel even more fucked off.

Spurs8182
284. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.07GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to weejp:

Donate me bollocks!

I'm not happy with the free service, I'm hardly gonna give them money to feel even more fucked off.

pmsl =D

KOJAC
285. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Spurs8182:

Reply to weejp:

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

Yeah true, then they want you to fuvking donate for a load of fucking pony lol.

your joking right....it's never normally this bad...they deliver free footy to your window...tottenham are 3-0 up and your still f*cking complaining...jeesh....

no pleasing some peeps...

Spurs8182
286. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Spurs8182:
Reply to weejp:

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

Yeah true, then they want you to fuvking donate for a load of fucking pony lol.

your joking right....it's never normally this bad...they deliver free footy to your window...tottenham are 3-0 up and your still f*cking complaining...jeesh....

no pleasing some peeps...

lol it has been bad the last 2 weeks, and the bloke comes on his microphone and tells people to fuck off lol and kicks you, im sure he is a manc.

fatfish
287. fatfish Wrote: | 21.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Modric.....Nuts.......Nuts......Quality. :D

Spurs8182
288. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.15GMT | Jan 27, 2009

shit got sloppy. knew it!!

KOJAC
289. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Spurs8182:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Spurs8182:
Reply to weejp:

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

Yeah true, then they want you to fuvking donate for a load of fucking pony lol.

your joking right....it's never normally this bad...they deliver free footy to your window...tottenham are 3-0 up and your still f*cking complaining...jeesh....

no pleasing some peeps...

lol it has been bad the last 2 weeks, and the bloke comes on his microphone and tells people to fuck off lol and kicks you, im sure he is a manc.

yes,i don't usually do iraq goals....but man utd have taken all other streams... ....thank god looks like the good stream is back...

Spurs8182
290. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.21GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Spurs8182:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Spurs8182:
Reply to weejp:

Is it just me or does iraqgoals fuck up every single time a match is on?

Yeah true, then they want you to fuvking donate for a load of fucking pony lol.

your joking right....it's never normally this bad...they deliver free footy to your window...tottenham are 3-0 up and your still f*cking complaining...jeesh....

no pleasing some peeps...

lol it has been bad the last 2 weeks, and the bloke comes on his microphone and tells people to fuck off lol and kicks you, im sure he is a manc.

yes,i don't usually do iraq goals....but man utd have taken all other streams... ....thank god looks like the good stream is back...

=D

Carlos_Kickball
291. Carlos_Kickball Wrote: | 21.22GMT | Jan 27, 2009

I think Modric is good for one tonight. Get back that 3 goal cushion!

COYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

lintal
292. lintal Wrote: | 21.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

would love pav to get 1

KOJAC
293. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

f*ck me...whats wrong with this commentator....3-1 up is better than 1-0 down...

Carlos_Kickball
294. Carlos_Kickball Wrote: | 21.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

f*ck me...whats wrong with this commentator....3-1 up is better than 1-0 down...

Not everyone loves Spurs as much as us mate! Still think we are good for one more.

elfranklins
295. elfranklins Wrote: | 21.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Yiiiiiidddddsssss!!!!!
=D

Carlos_Kickball
296. Carlos_Kickball Wrote: | 21.52GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Not one substitution. Tell you everything you need to know about 'Arry's thoughts of the options on the bench...

Carlos_Kickball
297. Carlos_Kickball Wrote: | 21.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Well, not until the 90th minute anyway!

JonSpurs
298. JonSpurs Wrote: | 21.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

glory glory

Spurs8182
299. Spurs8182 Wrote: | 21.54GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Good win, lets now get on and get up that table! Night all.

7screws
300. 7screws Wrote: | 21.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to JonSpurs:

glory glory

=D

johnnycheshunt
301. johnnycheshunt Wrote: | 21.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Thank fuck for that. Good performance apart from the Stoke goal which was pants. Phew. Right, where were we? Yes, lets try and get in the Champions league.

markxl1
302. markxl1 Wrote: | 22.01GMT | Jan 27, 2009

everyone worked hard = great team performance.
all the other bottom teams got fuck all.

so glad we got our revenge on that shower.
looked like modric hurt his knee, nothing serious I hope.

great night - yeah! COYS!!!!!!!!

:P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P

AndalucianSpur
303. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 22.02GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

vincenzo_spur
304. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 22.03GMT | Jan 27, 2009

top four boys?... you never know lol!!!

Seriously though, good game and well done modric/lennon/bentley. Enjoyed that with only twenty minutes of stress- the first few and then a bit after their goal!

BIOYC!

steve1987
305. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Looks like we ha a team tonight - one mistake but they took it well. No complaints here.

steve1987
306. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Pav and Defoe looks promising.

KOJAC
307. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.09GMT | Jan 27, 2009

my streams were bloody awful tonight only really saw the last bit properly....but considering the pressure we were under tonight...the lads did f*cking well....modric ran the show from what i could tell...like he should...

the second goal is what we haven't been seeing....zokora to modric to pav....bang defoe slams it in....2-0....coys

DANNYBOY
308. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 22.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to AndalucianSpur:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Do fuck off, prick. Modric played well tonight. Let's see him do it regularly and against a 4 man midfield; he had so much space it was criminal. I want him to prove me wrong, I honestly do, but I'm not convinced by him long term. We'll see.

AndalucianSpur
309. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 22.13GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Do fuck off, prick. Modric played well tonight. Let's see him do it regularly and against a 4 man midfield; he had so much space it was criminal. I want him to prove me wrong, I honestly do, but I'm not convinced by him long term. We'll see.

Ha! I see you can dish it out but can't take it yourself. :)

steve1987
310. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Do fuck off, prick. Modric played well tonight. Let's see him do it regularly and against a 4 man midfield; he had so much space it was criminal. I want him to prove me wrong, I honestly do, but I'm not convinced by him long term. We'll see.

Arse!

YidArmy
311. YidArmy Wrote: | 22.14GMT | Jan 27, 2009

You really are a twat arent you. Do you still live with your mother?

KOJAC
312. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

the official lot not messing about tonight....quick off the draw and all that...

massive result......LINK

steve1987
313. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.24GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to YidArmy:

You really are a twat arent you. Do you still live with your mother?

It helps if you click "reply" then we know who it is directed at. Hope it wasn't me. 8O

markxl1
314. markxl1 Wrote: | 22.28GMT | Jan 27, 2009

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

YidArmy
315. YidArmy Wrote: | 22.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to YidArmy:

You really are a twat arent you. Do you still live with your mother?

It helps if you click "reply" then we know who it is directed at. Hope it wasn't me. 8O

Thought id leave you guesin mate.

steve1987
316. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

No we don't ...........tosser! Only kidding Mark. :P

KOJAC
317. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

No we don't ...........tosser! Only kidding Mark. :P

so did you get to see much for your 50p....it was like standing behind the pillar and having a real annoying c*nt in front of you....well it was for me anyway.... :D

Bimmi
318. Bimmi Wrote: | 22.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

AndalucianSpur
319. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 22.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

Just that reading ill-informed bollocks like that posted by The_Fox pisses me off. "Dwarfish" indeed - as SpursSandy will no doubt confirm, size isn't everything. ;)

steve1987
320. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.49GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to steve1987:
Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

No we don't ...........tosser! Only kidding Mark. :P

so did you get to see much for your 50p....it was like standing behind the pillar and having a real annoying c*nt in front of you....well it was for me anyway.... :D

No, second half was fine, atdhe.net someone
posted it earlier. Saved 4 quid so I can feed the kids tomorrow.

KOJAC
321. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.54GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to AndalucianSpur:

Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

Just that reading ill-informed bollocks like that posted by The_Fox pisses me off. "Dwarfish" indeed - as SpursSandy will no doubt confirm, size isn't everything. ;)

you go girl.....but i think you'll find size is everything..... ;) ....they just lie

KOJAC
322. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

you're alright to come out bimmi.....it's safe now.....they're already talking about europe... :?

KOJAC
323. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to steve1987:
Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

No we don't ...........tosser! Only kidding Mark. :P

so did you get to see much for your 50p....it was like standing behind the pillar and having a real annoying c*nt in front of you....well it was for me anyway.... :D

No, second half was fine, atdhe.net someone
posted it earlier. Saved 4 quid so I can feed the kids tomorrow.

yeah...i could not get that one up for some reason....my machine was being a real bitch tonight....typical

Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat
324. Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat Wrote: | 22.58GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

steve1987
325. steve1987 Wrote: | 23.02GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to steve1987:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to steve1987:
Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

No we don't ...........tosser! Only kidding Mark. :P

so did you get to see much for your 50p....it was like standing behind the pillar and having a real annoying c*nt in front of you....well it was for me anyway.... :D

No, second half was fine, atdhe.net someone
posted it earlier. Saved 4 quid so I can feed the kids tomorrow.

yeah...i could not get that one up for some reason....my machine was being a real bitch tonight....typical

Well I missed the best bit and I was wearing my 125 years shirt tonight. My wife thinks I should grow up! (she bought me the shirt though)

Longwell
326. Longwell Wrote: | 23.04GMT | Jan 27, 2009

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. It ain't rocket surgery, you know.

steve1987
327. steve1987 Wrote: | 23.06GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. ...

Well, I think they played like a proper Spurs team tonight. You know, played some good stuff.

steve1987
328. steve1987 Wrote: | 23.08GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. ...

And Lenon did well on the left. He has potential to score goals from there.

Bimmi
329. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.11GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

you're alright to come out bimmi.....it's safe now.....they're already talking about europe... :?

=D =D

Bimmi
330. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.12GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:

Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

KOJAC
331. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.16GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to Longwell:

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. ...

And Lenon did well on the left. He has potential to score goals from there.

yes....lennon looked nice and fresh 2night and finished well...obviously...

steve1987
332. steve1987 Wrote: | 23.16GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:
Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

Obviously not............

KOJAC
333. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.17GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:
Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

let's see what the greek has to say about redknapp tonight....eh..!

lamf1958
334. lamf1958 Wrote: | 23.17GMT | Jan 27, 2009

COYS - well done for the 3 points, we can all go to bed happier than we've been all week. now hold that feeling and keep it going for the rest of the fecking season!

KOJAC
335. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.18GMT | Jan 27, 2009

where's ODM and people..i want to hear from someone who was at the lane....like a bedtime story....!

The_Fox
336. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.19GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to AndalucianSpur:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog flamer based on your impressive 20/20 hindsight is pretty old hat. Helmet, even.

steve1987
337. steve1987 Wrote: | 23.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to lamf1958:

COYS - well done for the 3 points, we can all go to bed happier than we've been all week. now hold that feeling and keep it going for the rest of the fecking season!

I going to bed and I'm going to be holding that feeling all night ...............I thank you!

onedavemackay
338. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.20GMT | Jan 27, 2009

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

onedavemackay
339. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.25GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

KOJAC
340. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

there you are....did you see modric live tonight....i didn't get to see it as the net was messing about....

defoe's goal was a good move....
modric left footed cross for dawson...
and lennon's nice run and finish...

onedavemackay
341. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to lamf1958:

COYS - well done for the 3 points, we can all go to bed happier than we've been all week. now hold that feeling and keep it going for the rest of the fecking season!

I going to bed and I'm going to be holding that feeling all night ...............I thank you!

We don't need to hear about your sex life

Bimmi
342. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

The_Fox
343. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.26GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

Nick_The_Greek
344. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 23.27GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:
Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

let's see what the greek has to say about redknapp tonight....eh..!

I thought Kojac was as Greek as me?One swallow does not make a summer,but a long awaited step in the right direction 8O

Bimmi
345. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

f*ck off...

KOJAC
346. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.29GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:
Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

let's see what the greek has to say about redknapp tonight....eh..!

I thought Kojac was as Greek as me?One swallow does not make a summer,but a long awaited step in the right direction 8O

he sure has.....nice and gracious of ...not like some....

onedavemackay
347. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.30GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

there you are....did you see modric live tonight....i didn't get to see it as the net was messing about....

defoe's goal was a good move....
modric left footed cross for dawson...
and lennon's nice run and finish...

No, I was absent tonight. Just watched the first half on Football First. We played some good stuff and Defoe and Pav look the bollocks.

Bolton will be tough but if Willesden Palais does the biz and Arry plays an attacking formation I think we can take them.

AndalucianSpur
348. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 23.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

20/20 hindsight, no - I've been defending Modric's inclusion as central midfielder in a 4-4-2 lineup with proper support alongside him for over a month now. Read ODM above (338) and you may be enlightened but I doubt it.

KOJAC
349. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to Paddy Mc Ginteys Goat:
Reply to Bimmi:

is it ok to look now?? did we win??

*looks out from under the covers*

Yes we beat West Brom

come on.. you can do better than that..

let's see what the greek has to say about redknapp tonight....eh..!

I thought Kojac was as Greek as me?One swallow does not make a summer,but a long awaited step in the right direction 8O

he sure has.....nice and gracious of ...not like some....

of you.... 8)....that should read..

The_Fox
350. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.31GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

This smacks seriously of 'the only striker in Europe that would even consider joining us right now'. I'd say our strikers aren't so much the problem (Bent aside, fair enough) but the inconsistent bunch of prima donnas that can't create any chances for them.

I'd be looking to spend...

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

Modric is a good footballer - no argument there. I just don't think he's cut out for the Premier League. And saying that he's been creating chances all season is a bit strong, don't you think? Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

onedavemackay
351. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

zok's jock strap
352. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 23.32GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Just to continue my one-man crusade.....

Didier did not lose the ball tonight at all.

Interesting.

TMWNN
353. TMWNN Wrote: | 23.33GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Modric was special tonight, you could see he loved it out there tonight.

I won't get too carried away though as Stoke were the worst team I've seen at the Lane this season and gave far too much space in the first half.

Cudicini didn't have an awful lot to do, but looked the business.

Happy, but sceptical still.

onedavemackay
354. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Actually, dannyboy is not anti Modders

The_Fox
355. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.34GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

f*ck off...

The force of your argument floors me. Well done.

KOJAC
356. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

Modric is a good footballer - no argument there. I just don't think he's cut out for the Premier League. And saying that he's been creating chances all season is a bit strong, don't you think? Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

you should stop digging that hole for yourself....modric is one of the best players we have signed in ages...AGES...he is world class.....END OF....

DANNYBOY
357. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Certainly am arsewipe. Stoke at home, very impressive. And he was very impressive. Let me see him do it against a top team, on a regular basis, with 4 in the middle, being man marked and I'll be convinced. Like I've been saying all season. Come on, really, we should be beating these teams 4 or 5 - 0 every bloody week; the fact we're all getting excited about beating fucking Stoke ! says volumes. Good display all round against very poor opposition, nonetheless, a step in the right direction.

Longwell
358. Longwell Wrote: | 23.35GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to steve1987:

Reply to Longwell:

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. ...

And Lenon did well on the left. He has potential to score goals from there.

Yep. Lennon might be better on the right, but it's not by much. Bentley, by contrast, is a completely different player depending on what side of the pitch he's on.

Lennon appears to have been working on that slightly pulled-back cross with his left foot. Tonight was the fourth or fifth game this season I've seen him show that as an option from the left rather than just cutting back and driving inside. To be sure, that's still his stronger and preferred move, but if he continues to develop that little pull-back, he'll be much more difficult to contain down the left flank.

Can't wait 'til Saturday now. Hopefully the lads are salivating at the prospect of carving up Bolton like they did Stoke tonight.

Bimmi
359. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

Modric is a good footballer - no argument there. I just don't think he's cut out for the Premier League. And saying that he's been creating chances all season is a bit strong, don't you think? Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

oh my god will you f*ck the f*ck off.. what player have you been watching??

not cut out for the Prem League?? are you serious??

is it any wonder good players always appear to struggle at Tottenham with comments like that..

f*ck off..

COME ON YOU SPURS..

Spurs4eva
360. Spurs4eva Wrote: | 23.36GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Harry could you start a thread: Which ex-Spurs player should Harry bring back next??? I think it should be Malbranque!!!!!!!!!!! =D

DANNYBOY
361. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Actually, dannyboy is not anti Modders

Thank you kindly Mr ODM; someone who actually listens to my argument rather than just telling me to fuck off because I suggest Modric may benefit from a fortnight off ;)

KOJAC
362. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Modric was special tonight, you could see he loved it out there tonight.

I won't get too carried away though as Stoke were the worst team I've seen at the Lane this season and gave far too much space in the first half.

Cudicini didn't have an awful lot to do, but looked...

yes but stoke didn't get the chance to stifle us tonight....early goals make all the difference....and we actually kept the ball a bit...

onedavemackay
363. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.38GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:
Reply to The_Fox:

No. That would just be one window - we bought J2S this summer. Left-footer with good crossing ability, bag of tricks, pace and desire (he left the glamour of Barca to play first team football, remember). But that's not good enough for us, apparently.

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

Modric is a good footballer - no argument there. I just don't think he's cut out for the Premier League. And saying that he's been creating chances all season is a bit strong, don't you think? Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

It's a fact that he's created loads of chances.

Don't understand your : Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

What do you mean ?

DANNYBOY
364. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.39GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Spurs4eva:

Harry could you start a thread: Which ex-Spurs player should Harry bring back next??? I think it should be Malbranque!!!!!!!!!!! =D

Tony Galvin

Longwell
365. Longwell Wrote: | 23.40GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to steve1987:
Reply to Longwell:

My stream was in and out, but from what I saw that was arguably Bentley's finest performance in our shirt to date. Also, first time he's started on the right with two up front. Coincidence? Hats off to Harry for finally having the sense to start off with a proper alignment for our dapper dandy. ...

And Lenon did well on the left. He has potential to score goals from there.

Yep. Lennon might be better on the right, but it's not by much. Bentley, by contrast, is a completely different player depending on what side of the pitch he's on.

Lennon appears to have been working on that slightly pulled-back cross with his left foot. Tonight was the fourth or...

Come to think of it, that "score a goal with his left foot" move wasn't too shabby either.

Bimmi
366. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.41GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Certainly am arsewipe. Stoke at home, very impressive. And he was very impressive. Let me see him do it against a top team, on a regular basis, with 4 in the middle, being man marked and I'll be convinced. Like I've been saying all season. Come on, really, we should be beating these teams 4 or 5 - 0...

right on que!!

yep i'll accept all of that in fairness to you DB.. but let's get behind him now rather than suggesting we bench him eh??

and "arsewipe"?? you're mellowing out a bit don't you think??

The_Fox
367. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.42GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Bimmi
368. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.42GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Actually, dannyboy is not anti Modders

no, but wants him benched nonetheless..

onedavemackay
369. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Actually, dannyboy is not anti Modders

Thank you kindly Mr ODM; someone who actually listens to my argument rather than just telling me to fuck off because I suggest Modric may benefit from a fortnight off ;)

Pleasure Dear Boy. Amazing how many people on here can't read or maybe they just don't understand.


But of course with you and Bimmi it's almost like a marriage neither of you seem to understand each other.


Entertains the rest of us though. :D

DANNYBOY
370. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to DANNYBOY:
Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Certainly am arsewipe. Stoke at home, very impressive. And he was very impressive. Let me see him do it against a top team, on a regular basis, with 4 in the middle, being man marked and I'll be convinced. Like I've been saying all season. Come on, really, we should be beating these teams 4 or 5 - 0...

right on que!!

yep i'll accept all of that in fairness to you DB.. but let's get behind him now rather than suggesting we bench him eh??

and "arsewipe"?? you're mellowing out a bit don't you think??

Cunt; better?

Nick_The_Greek
370. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 23.43GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to Jeremy Paxton:

Fair point - I suspect Gio is another of those contributing to the 'imbalance' that Redknapp keeps going on about. Though I think he means imbalance of ability rather than imbalance of positions.

I think we are wasting J2S too, but in Harry's defence, he made Trevor Sinclair into an...

I was being a bit harsh on Harry, there. I think we may see J2S a bit more now that he's getting back to full fitness. And yes - Modric must be dropped. Defoe/Bent and Pav up front with a proper Premier League midfield behind them - i.e. no dwarfish fancy-pants in the middle of the park.

"And yes - Modric must be dropped". Want to revise your opinion now you fucking dickhead? I'm guessing that you are the bastard offspring of Dannyboy and Jade Goody?

Yes, Modric had a good game. One assist and plenty of pretty stuff. Can I just remind you we were playing Stoke at home? If wee Luka can cut it at the Library, Old Trafford, Anfield and Second Hand Bridge, I'll be happy to eat my words. Oh, and coming on here going off like a prepubescent blog...

Modders has been creating chances most of the season but now he has two decent strikers in front of him as opposed to one poor one called Bent.

If you don't appreciate just how good Modric is you aren't concentrating.

Modric is a good footballer - no argument there. I just don't think he's cut out for the Premier League. And saying that he's been creating chances all season is a bit strong, don't you think? Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

It's a fact that he's created loads of chances.

Don't understand your : Grabbing a wee bit onto the coattails of success, there?

What do you mean ?

It sounds like he is from the wrong side of Hadrians Wall ;)

Longwell
372. Longwell Wrote: | 23.44GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Have you *seen* our first XI lately? Modric doesn't need to submit weekly MoM performances to crack that nut.

KOJAC
373. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.45GMT | Jan 27, 2009

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

DANNYBOY
374. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

different players entirely; horses for courses. Anyone notice how we been on our losing streak since JJ HASN'T PLAYED? mmm, coincidence?

onedavemackay
375. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.47GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

I think you're proving my point.


I also think a seriously good DM would make a hell of a difference, in fact, from what I've seen, Zokora had one of HIS better games distribution wise and that has a direct result on all the team.

Longwell
376. Longwell Wrote: | 23.48GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

Seriously. Who are these midfield luminaries we're meant to be starting in place of our most reliable creative outlet? Modric isn't a perfect player, but he's about the closest thing we've got.

Bimmi
377. Bimmi Wrote: | 23.49GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to DANNYBOY:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

EX-FUCKING-ACTLY!!

Dannyboy i hope to god reading this..

no doubt you'll still come up with some justification for this ludicrous notion..

COYS..

Actually, dannyboy is not anti Modders

Thank you kindly Mr ODM; someone who actually listens to my argument rather than just telling me to fuck off because I suggest Modric may benefit from a fortnight off ;)

Pleasure Dear Boy. Amazing how many people on here can't read or maybe they just don't understand.


But of course with you and Bimmi it's almost like a marriage neither of you seem to understand each other.


Entertains the rest of us though. :D

again... Dannyboy did want Modric benched..

apologies for any misunderstanding..

zok's jock strap
378. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 23.50GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Just to continue my one-man crusade.....

Didier did not lose the ball tonight at all.

Interesting.

Join the crusade ODM

You know it makes sense ;)

TMWNN
379. TMWNN Wrote: | 23.51GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to TMWNN:

Modric was special tonight, you could see he loved it out there tonight.

I won't get too carried away though as Stoke were the worst team I've seen at the Lane this season and gave far too much space in the first half.

Cudicini didn't have an awful lot to do, but looked...

yes but stoke didn't get the chance to stifle us tonight....early goals make all the difference....and we actually kept the ball a bit...

True, they couldn't handle our quick passing and movement in the first half.

KOJAC
380. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

different players entirely; horses for courses. Anyone notice how we been on our losing streak since JJ HASN'T PLAYED? mmm, coincidence?

when everbody is fit....it will be fun to see what happens....who will play where....for me jenas can play almost anywhere if he wanted to...

DANNYBOY
381. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.53GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:

Modric was special tonight, you could see he loved it out there tonight.

I won't get too carried away though as Stoke were the worst team I've seen at the Lane this season and gave far too much space in the first half.

Cudicini didn't have an awful lot to do, but looked...

yes but stoke didn't get the chance to stifle us tonight....early goals make all the difference....and we actually kept the ball a bit...

True, they couldn't handle our quick passing and movement in the first half.

but what happened to the 2nd half? ;)

The_Fox
382. The_Fox Wrote: | 23.54GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

I think you're proving my point.


I also think a seriously good DM would make a hell of a difference, in fact, from what I've seen, Zokora had one of HIS better games distribution wise and that has a direct result on all the team.

Yes, Zok was excellent tonight, excepting two minor positional errors which spring to mind. Thank f*ck we agree on SOMETHING... Regarding Modric, I think we'll just agree to disagree.

Longwell
383. Longwell Wrote: | 23.55GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

different players entirely; horses for courses. Anyone notice how we been on our losing streak since JJ HASN'T PLAYED? mmm, coincidence?

Yes. Where was his winning influence versus Fulham? Traveled ahead to West Brom to help us on the road there, presumably. Oh, wait...

TMWNN
384. TMWNN Wrote: | 23.56GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:

Modric was special tonight, you could see he loved it out there tonight.

I won't get too carried away though as Stoke were the worst team I've seen at the Lane this season and gave far too much space in the first half.

Cudicini didn't have an awful lot to do, but looked...

yes but stoke didn't get the chance to stifle us tonight....early goals make all the difference....and we actually kept the ball a bit...

True, they couldn't handle our quick passing and movement in the first half.

but what happened to the 2nd half? ;)

Redknapp swapped wingers and complacency set in.

Nick_The_Greek
385. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 23.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

KOJAC
386. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.57GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

Seriously. Who are these midfield luminaries we're meant to be starting in place of our most reliable creative outlet? Modric isn't a perfect player, but he's about the closest thing we've got.

exactly.....i'm not sure why some people are saying it was only stoke....we haven't won in ages and are utter shite....

modric is actually worth the money we spent on him if you ask me....and exactly the type of player you can build a team around...

but we don't build teams...do we... :\ ...he is also toughter than people think.....

DANNYBOY
387. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 23.59GMT | Jan 27, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

no we haven't; don't believe The Daily Mail - I keep telling you. Like I said before anyhow, what does a Greek know about football? You prove my point. Jeez. ;) =D

zok's jock strap
388. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 00.00GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

I think you're proving my point.


I also think a seriously good DM would make a hell of a difference, in fact, from what I've seen, Zokora had one of HIS better games distribution wise and that has a direct result on all the team.

Yes, Zok was excellent tonight, excepting two minor positional errors which spring to mind. Thank f*ck we agree on SOMETHING... Regarding Modric, I think we'll just agree to disagree.

Thanks Fox, that'll do for me.

You're officially signed up too & it's now a three man crusade.

Be a lover not a hater.

"Zokora not officially AS shit as everyone would have you believe"

The_Fox
389. The_Fox Wrote: | 00.00GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Have you *seen* our first XI lately? Modric doesn't need to submit weekly MoM performances to crack that nut.

This may come as a shock, but building a successful football team is not always about fielding your eleven best players.

DANNYBOY
390. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 00.01GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Kojac - "i'm not sure why some people are saying it was only stoke"

Erm, because it was only Stoke? No wins away all season, promoted last season, only creativity is a throw in; shall I go on?

KOJAC
391. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.01GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

i hope thats a joke greek....please

DANNYBOY
392. DANNYBOY Wrote: | 00.02GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Fox - as soon as Palacios is available (Bolton?) who do you think will make way?

AndalucianSpur
393. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 00.03GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par with Modric? Apologies to zjs, but hopefully swapping Palacios for Zokora and keeping two true wingers in the team will give Modric even more options and we'll see him shine week in week out as you ask.

Nick_The_Greek
394. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 00.03GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

no we haven't; don't believe The Daily Mail - I keep telling you. Like I said before anyhow, what does a Greek know about football? You prove my point. Jeez. ;) =D

SSN

Longwell
395. Longwell Wrote: | 00.04GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Longwell:
Reply to KOJAC:

forget about tonight's game....

i'd rather have modric in the middle of the park than jenas anyday...ANYDAY....

Seriously. Who are these midfield luminaries we're meant to be starting in place of our most reliable creative outlet? Modric isn't a perfect player, but he's about the closest thing we've got.

exactly.....i'm not sure why some people are saying it was only stoke....we haven't won in ages and are utter shite....

modric is actually worth the money we spent on him if you ask me....and exactly the type of player you can build a team around...

but we don't build...

Interesting point on his toughness. He seemed a lot more resilient early in the season; incredible balance and hardly ever went down unless fouled pretty hard. I interpreted that as him making an effort to show he could stick in the league physically.

I think as the campaign has worn on, though, he's seemed to hit the ground a bit more often. It could be he's trying to suss out his sweet spot with the refs in a new league; that is, in terms of when he should bear down and try to shrug off the contact to keep the move going versus allowing himself to go down and potentially win a free kick in a promising spot. Or it could just be fatigue, but Modric strikes me as a clever fellow so I'm going to assume the former explanation is true.

AndalucianSpur
396. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 00.08GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Kojac - "i'm not sure why some people are saying it was only stoke"

Erm, because it was only Stoke? No wins away all season, promoted last season, only creativity is a throw in; shall I go on?

We couldn't beat Pompey at home last week and they'd lost 5 on the bounce and were subsequently knocked out of the cup at home by Swansea (and lost again tonight). So it's a big improvement in my book.

KOJAC
397. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.08GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Kojac - "i'm not sure why some people are saying it was only stoke"

Erm, because it was only Stoke? No wins away all season, promoted last season, only creativity is a throw in; shall I go on?

yes but you're talking like we've been beating these types of teams all season....we haven't.....we are as shit as stoke....remember

zok's jock strap
398. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 00.11GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to AndalucianSpur:

Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par with Modric? Apologies to zjs, but hopefully...

No appologies necessary my friend. I'm all for upgrades.

I just want Didier's successor to really prove it... and for that to occur I want Zokora to continue playing excellently as stern competition.

which is why I choose to support him.

Wanna join the crusade?

scar88
399. scar88 Wrote: | 00.12GMT | Jan 28, 2009

good result tonight need the points and the performance. just had a thought about our squad, its probably the best we have had since i can remember, okay where still missing that left winger but other than that i think we got competition for places, look at villa, ther squads not as good as ours bar ashley young, i think we will give people a run for there money next year, i might get slaughtered but honestly look at our squad!!

KOJAC
400. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.12GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to DANNYBOY:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

no we haven't; don't believe The Daily Mail - I keep telling you. Like I said before anyhow, what does a Greek know about football? You prove my point. Jeez. ;) =D

SSN

they couldn't afford lennon....surely...he wiil cost alot more than PSB did....

scar88
401. scar88 Wrote: | 00.13GMT | Jan 28, 2009

oh i forgot to add, zokoras positioning was spot on today

AndalucianSpur
402. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 00.14GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Reply to AndalucianSpur:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par with Modric? Apologies to zjs, but hopefully...

No appologies necessary my friend. I'm all for upgrades.

I just want Didier's successor to really prove it... and for that to occur I want Zokora to continue playing excellently as stern competition.

which is why I choose to support him.

Wanna join the...

I do like grafters and Zok also has versatility (RB, CB, DM) so I'm all for keeping him at The Lane. Would ditch several others long before him (does that count as a yes?).

TMWNN
403. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.15GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to scar88:

good result tonight need the points and the performance. just had a thought about our squad, its probably the best we have had since i can remember, okay where still missing that left winger but other than that i think we got competition for places, look at villa, ther squads not as good as ours bar...

Let's worry about Saturday first eh?

KOJAC
404. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.17GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to scar88:

good result tonight need the points and the performance. just had a thought about our squad, its probably the best we have had since i can remember, okay where still missing that left winger but other than that i think we got competition for places, look at villa, ther squads not as good as ours bar...

Let's worry about Saturday first eh?

you've got to admire his fantasy.... =D ...what a win can do

TMWNN
405. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.19GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Zokora is a decent squad player, and as no one will pay any proper wonga for the bloke, let's keep him in the squad. Never a first XI player.

Nick_The_Greek
406. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 00.20GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to DANNYBOY:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

no we haven't; don't believe The Daily Mail - I keep telling you. Like I said before anyhow, what does a Greek know about football? You prove my point. Jeez. ;) =D

SSN

they couldn't afford lennon....surely...he wiil cost alot more than PSB did....

You would not what stunt Redknapp will pull next,they said Lennon plus cash 8O

zok's jock strap
407. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 00.20GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Absolutely =D

Did I mention he didn't give it away tonight and only four times against Utd? This will undoubetdly bite me in the arse at some point.... but I'm counting you know.

All in the name of dispelling myths, or advocating the point that he is being coached the art of simplicity.

KOJAC
408. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.24GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to DANNYBOY:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Anyone see we have offered Lennon in P/EX for Keane 8O

no we haven't; don't believe The Daily Mail - I keep telling you. Like I said before anyhow, what does a Greek know about football? You prove my point. Jeez. ;) =D

SSN

they couldn't afford lennon....surely...he wiil cost alot more than PSB did....

You would not what stunt Redknapp will pull next,they said Lennon plus cash 8O

liverpool would love lennon....he would probably give them a chance at the title...

i will personally lead a riot on the high road if they swap lennon for keane.....unless it is a stupid amount of money they are giving us...and i mean stupid money...

TMWNN
409. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.24GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Absolutely =D

Did I mention he didn't give it away tonight and only four times against Utd? This will undoubetdly bite me in the arse at some point.... but I'm counting you know.

All in the name of dispelling myths, or advocating the point that he is being coached the...

No need, he already has the mind of a simpleton.

scar88
410. scar88 Wrote: | 00.24GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to scar88:

good result tonight need the points and the performance. just had a thought about our squad, its probably the best we have had since i can remember, okay where still missing that left winger but other than that i think we got competition for places, look at villa, ther squads not as good as ours bar...

Let's worry about Saturday first eh?

you've got to admire his fantasy.... =D ...what a win can do

i was just saying that on paper we have a very good squad, this has nothing to do with tonights win

amerispurs
411. amerispurs Wrote: | 00.26GMT | Jan 28, 2009

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par with Modric? Apologies to zjs, but hopefully swapping Palacios for Zokora and keeping two true wingers in the team will give Modric even more options and we'll see him shine week in week out as you ask.......

I for one like to have Hudds in the middle, but I was very impressed with Mods dictating play throughout the game. And, as you have pointed out there were two true wingers.....to be honest I can't remember the last time Bently was played on the right, with Modric in the middle. Zokora played really well, no mistakes that I can recall and did his job, sat in front of the back four and didn't push to far forward. We will see how we do against bolton and if Paladius works well with Modders. Same team for me with only Paladius in for Zokora. Well crap, Bently too, 2 matches right? Lennon on the right, and J2S on the left. We are better playing with wingers and two up front, not one.

zok's jock strap
412. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 00.26GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Absolutely =D

Did I mention he didn't give it away tonight and only four times against Utd? This will undoubetdly bite me in the arse at some point.... but I'm counting you know.

All in the name of dispelling myths, or advocating the point that he is being coached the...

No need, he already has the mind of a simpleton.

:D

Spurs through and through.

KOJAC
413. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.28GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Absolutely =D

Did I mention he didn't give it away tonight and only four times against Utd? This will undoubetdly bite me in the arse at some point.... but I'm counting you know.

All in the name of dispelling myths, or advocating the point that he is being coached the...

you need to start his fan club... ;) ..and i did see him head the ball to a stoke player in the last 10 minutes.....

he doesn't have a brain you know....but he is a thoroughly nice chap and a good positive squad man to have about the place....just my opinion of course....

zok's jock strap
414. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 00.31GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to zok's jock strap:

Absolutely =D

Did I mention he didn't give it away tonight and only four times against Utd? This will undoubetdly bite me in the arse at some point.... but I'm counting you know.

All in the name of dispelling myths, or advocating the point that he is being coached the...

you need to start his fan club... ;) ..and i did see him head the ball to a stoke player in the last 10 minutes.....

he doesn't have a brain you know....but he is a thoroughly nice chap and a good positive squad man to have about the place....just my opinion of course....

Headers don't count.

If it's my club, it's my rules.

Fair?

KOJAC
415. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.33GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to scar88:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to scar88:

good result tonight need the points and the performance. just had a thought about our squad, its probably the best we have had since i can remember, okay where still missing that left winger but other than that i think we got competition for places, look at villa, ther squads not as good as ours bar...

Let's worry about Saturday first eh?

you've got to admire his fantasy.... =D ...what a win can do

i was just saying that on paper we have a very good squad, this has nothing to do with tonights win

no i know....i wasn't digging at you.....we have a good squad i agree....but we are still in deep doo-doo....no harm in dreaming about next season though....

TMWNN
416. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.36GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

KOJAC
417. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.38GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

The He-She
418. The He-She Wrote: | 00.40GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Bollocks

AndalucianSpur
419. AndalucianSpur Wrote: | 00.41GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

Wouldn't mind that at all, IF the two playing wide are actually wingers and not CMs playing narrow and congesting the middle.

TMWNN
420. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.42GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

That's what I want, with Pav up front. 4 2 3 1. If it works, I'd play that at home too.

TMWNN
421. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.45GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

That's what I want, with Pav up front. 4 2 3 1. If it works, I'd play that at home too.

Unless we're playing the likes of Stoke. ;)

KOJAC
422. KOJAC Wrote: | 00.46GMT | Jan 28, 2009

does harry have a journalist with him at all times....or somethimg...

why the f*ck would we offer lennon to get keane back.... ...did they not see tonights goal.....i really hope this is bullshit....it's so hard to get pace like lennon has.....

Nick_The_Greek
423. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 00.47GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

That's what I want, with Pav up front. 4 2 3 1. If it works, I'd play that at home too.

I`d like to see us win regularly

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
424. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 00.50GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to AndalucianSpur:

Reply to markxl1:

if spurs lose we slag the players off.
if spurs win we slag each other off.
=D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D =D

Just that reading ill-informed bollocks like that posted by The_Fox pisses me off. "Dwarfish" indeed - as SpursSandy will no doubt confirm, size isn't everything. ;)

Aye, it's quality mate.

TMWNN
425. TMWNN Wrote: | 00.53GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to amerispurs:

reply to andalucian spur....

Someone else told you to stop digging that hole you've found yourself in, but it seems you just can't let go of the shovel. So you really believe that the performance levels of our other central midfielders all season long have been consistently on a par...

One up front isn't such a bad idea away from home. What's the point in playing two if you're losing the midfield battle? Horses for courses.

i can see harry playing zokora and palacios behind modric...with two wideman and one upfront....for sure when we are away from home...

That's what I want, with Pav up front. 4 2 3 1. If it works, I'd play that at home too.

I`d like to see us win regularly

You'd like to see Redknapp out. ;)

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
426. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 01.01GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Whoa... do I dare to get excited that we've reached the heady heights of (?)13! Crikey. Lucky for some. And with only one new player...
I couldn't watch the match as I only had SSN duffness to listen to (was in the pub).. what made the difference? The formation? Greater desire? Greater skill? No Hudd? Would the way we played Stoke work against Bolton away?

Am definitely in the Modders camp... just you watch the boy grow into a giant... ish.

TMWNN
427. TMWNN Wrote: | 01.12GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:

Whoa... do I dare to get excited that we've reached the heady heights of (?)13! Crikey. Lucky for some. And with only one new player...
I couldn't watch the match as I only had SSN duffness to listen to (was in the pub).. what made the difference? The formation? Greater desire? Greater skill?...

The main difference was that Stoke were shite. 8O

Although we did move the ball swiftly and accurately.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
428. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Wrote: | 01.16GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:

Whoa... do I dare to get excited that we've reached the heady heights of (?)13! Crikey. Lucky for some. And with only one new player...
I couldn't watch the match as I only had SSN duffness to listen to (was in the pub).. what made the difference? The formation? Greater desire? Greater skill?...

The main difference was that Stoke were shite. 8O

Although we did move the ball swiftly and accurately.

Well, that helps. ;)

KOJAC
429. KOJAC Wrote: | 01.20GMT | Jan 28, 2009

the bale curse continues......oooooohhhhhh!!(ghostly noise repeating)....for effect

BruceCastle
430. BruceCastle Wrote: | 02.07GMT | Jan 28, 2009

que goober and the ghost chasers theme. LINK

destruktornaut
431. destruktornaut Wrote: | 06.50GMT | Jan 28, 2009

I really like Cudicini, and I was glad to see him in the sticks. I didn't see Beattie's goal, but on the few set pieces that Stoke had (woodgate's foul) he looked really composed. It wasn't a case of "oh s***, they're shooting" like it was with Alnwick, or when Gomes was out of form.

munso
432. munso Wrote: | 08.10GMT | Jan 28, 2009

the independent are now suggesting either Lennon or jenas + cash for PSB.

I know which one I'd rather see stay, mind you I'd like them both to.
Liverpool surely cannot value Keane at £20 mill can they?? 8O

munso
433. munso Wrote: | 08.13GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Great performance last night.

I do feel that certain players, ie Modders, Bentley Thudd look good in a winning team, but tend to drop off the radar when the shit is flying around.

shame the Thudd did'nt get 15-20 mins, I'm sure he would have had a couple of pops at goal, which would have done his confidence no harm!

onedavemackay
434. onedavemackay Wrote: | 08.24GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to The_Fox:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to The_Fox:
Reply to onedavemackay:

For all those who suggest Modric should be dropped please note :





You should be supporting Stoke or Bolton.

One swallow doth not a summer make, or words to that effect. So I think I'll just stick to Spurs for another 30 years, if you don't mind.

I don't mind but if you think this is the only time Modders has played well this season you haven't been watching.

No, I'm saying that Modric will have to play THIS well every single game, at home and away, to be part of our first XI - and I don't think he can / will be allowed to. We beat Stoke, repeat: Stoke, 3-1 at WHL, and they were atrocious throughout.

I think you're proving my point.


I also think a seriously good DM would make a hell of a difference, in fact, from what I've seen, Zokora had one of HIS better games distribution wise and that has a direct result on all the team.

Yes, Zok was excellent tonight, excepting two minor positional errors which spring to mind. Thank f*ck we agree on SOMETHING... Regarding Modric, I think we'll just agree to disagree.

OK but I'm right

Longwell
435. Longwell Wrote: | 09.11GMT | Jan 28, 2009

As someone fairly new to the game, changing tactics based on playing home or away is something that puzzles me. I can certainly understand adjusting your tactics to the team you're playing or even which personnel you expect that team to use. But changing things up simply because it's a different venue? Is the crowd really that big a factor? Different pitch conditions? What am I missing?

In general, seems to me like you'd want to identify a formation that gives you the best chance of scoring more goals than the other lot and stick with it. Make the opposition adjust to you, not the other way around.

jolsgonemental
436. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 09.24GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

As someone fairly new to the game, changing tactics based on playing home or away is something that puzzles me. I can certainly understand adjusting your tactics to the team you're playing or even which personnel you expect that team to use. But changing things up simply because it's a different...

home teams tend to be more aggressive coming forward, and defend deeper when away.

which means that potentially you need to think of riding an early storm on the road and maybe playing on the break. where as at home you will probably have more possession at home and need to think about how to break teams down.

i think the expectations of the crowd do play a part in this.

robbieboy
437. robbieboy Wrote: | 09.37GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Hi guys, good result last nite, bout time, though it was stoke, a wins a win, and by god we needed a win.
Anyone know any goss on Fred and Appiah? Read the reports this morning, looks like Appiah's being lined up for a no from Arry. Cant understand why they dont just stick him on a pay as play contract until end of season with an option of a long term from there. Fred, looks unlikely also if he didn't turn up for the meeting, not ideal first impressions! Still would love to get a new striker in, looks like the left hand side is dead for another window also, all gone quiet over there. Anyone know if that side is likely to be strengthened? running out of time, and cash... i expect.

jolsgonemental
438. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 09.41GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to robbieboy:

Hi guys, good result last nite, bout time, though it was stoke, a wins a win, and by god we needed a win.
Anyone know any goss on Fred and Appiah? Read the reports this morning, looks like Appiah's being lined up for a no from Arry. Cant understand why they dont just stick him on a pay as play...

Appiah isnt fit.

where would we play him?

Longwell
439. Longwell Wrote: | 09.45GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to Longwell:

As someone fairly new to the game, changing tactics based on playing home or away is something that puzzles me. I can certainly understand adjusting your tactics to the team you're playing or even which personnel you expect that team to use. But changing things up simply because it's a different...

home teams tend to be more aggressive coming forward, and defend deeper when away.

which means that potentially you need to think of riding an early storm on the road and maybe playing on the break. where as at home you will probably have more possession at home and need to think about...

That makes some sense, but it still strikes me as a near tautalogy. Teams play differently home and away because they play differently home and away. Silly to give the crowd that much influence, in my opinion.

Given our personnel at the moment, I think we invite trouble when we line up in a more defensive posture on the road. We're not a team that grinds out those 1-0 slugfests away from home. Indeed, we're usually on the short end of those scrappy sorts of games. Compounding the problem is the fact that I don't think we have the team-wide pace to be an effective counter-attacking team. The only recent example I've seen of us looking even remotely dangerous on the break was when Bent was on fire late last year. Far more typical I think was Saturday's match at Old Trafford. We had a number of opportunities to hit ManU on the break, and they caught up to us virtually every time.

We have success against the big, physical sides (e.g. the Stokes and Boltons of the world) when we do what we did last night: move the ball quickly, exploit any space they give us, and keep possession. Why that wouldn't work away from home is beyond me. I say if Bolton wants to be more aggressive at their place, let 'em. They can't be too threatening if we do our job and keep the ball. Easier said than done of course, but I think being less aggressive on the road is shooting ourselves in the foot more often than not.

TMWNN
440. TMWNN Wrote: | 10.03GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to robbieboy:

Hi guys, good result last nite, bout time, though it was stoke, a wins a win, and by god we needed a win.
Anyone know any goss on Fred and Appiah? Read the reports this morning, looks like Appiah's being lined up for a no from Arry. Cant understand why they dont just stick him on a pay as play...

Appiah isnt fit.

where would we play him?

Appiah is playing in the reserves against Reading tonight.

A decision to be made very soon.

The_Fox
441. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.06GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to DANNYBOY:

Fox - as soon as Palacios is available (Bolton?) who do you think will make way?

That's a very good question. Old Twitchy isn't exactly sending clear, consistent signals about who he favors. Palacios' first game will be Arsenal at the Lane (no?), where I think he'll come off the bench in the second half. And I think Harry's central midfield will eventually be Palacios and Jenas.

Kluffah_Yid
442. Kluffah_Yid Wrote: | 10.28GMT | Jan 28, 2009

in my eyes the only difference between last night and the rest of the season, and even the second half, was desire. This was no more evident than in our honeymoon period with 'Arry and the hunger shown then.

We can argue the toss over who to play across the middle of the park, but in reality they are a technically astute bunch capable of bothering any team. Its just the desire, or lack of, that causes so many problems.

This malaise has almost become our club legacy, and its confounded by the fact that change has been our only constant for over a decade.

On the plus side Palacios seems to be the kind of player who would be happy to pay his £5 subs just to be part of it. As much of a c*&t Bellamy is, he would have offered the same.

DingDongDes
443. DingDongDes Wrote: | 10.41GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to jolsgonemental:
Reply to robbieboy:

Hi guys, good result last nite, bout time, though it was stoke, a wins a win, and by god we needed a win.
Anyone know any goss on Fred and Appiah? Read the reports this morning, looks like Appiah's being lined up for a no from Arry. Cant understand why they dont just stick him on a pay as play...

Appiah isnt fit.

where would we play him?

Appiah is playing in the reserves against Reading tonight.

A decision to be made very soon.

And Fred was in faces last night. Fell out sometime this morning. 8) Thats how much he wants to be on this team. He's done his research and went down the club after standing up a meet and greet with the gaffer. He heard we only sign plonkers.

robbieboy
444. robbieboy Wrote: | 10.46GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Well if Appiah's fit that's great we should take him, providing wages works, or even if he's on a pay as a play contract - if he's such an inspirational leader that could be what we need. Palacious maybe a box to box player, but not sure he's a leader. I dont think we can have too many quality players especially when there's some there, who still just dont quite cut it still. Fred- Oh dear... not sure that's the kind of temperment we want right now, even if he's a good player., and i heard he's pretty silky, and good in the air... just what we want on paper, but paper to field never works for spurs!

jolsgonemental
445. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 10.48GMT | Jan 28, 2009

odious have given Daws a 6. the lowest mark for the team for last night.

stupid cunts

The_Fox
446. The_Fox Wrote: | 10.56GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

odious have given Daws a 6. the lowest mark for the team for last night.

stupid cunts

Well, someone had to - for me, Bentley just edged it over Woody and Dawson.

Nunchucks
447. Nunchucks Wrote: | 10.59GMT | Jan 28, 2009

If Gary Megson manages to seduce Veloso to Bolton, every single one of you is dead.

corlukas-veruka
448. corlukas-veruka Wrote: | 11.01GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

If Gary Megson manages to seduce Veloso to Bolton, every single one of you is dead.

Now we know why he did not join in the summer he was waiting for a big team to come in for him. ;)

jolsgonemental
449. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.17GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

If Gary Megson manages to seduce Veloso to Bolton, every single one of you is dead.

isnt he actually a bit average anyway?

steve1987
450. steve1987 Wrote: | 11.29GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to Nunchucks:

If Gary Megson manages to seduce Veloso to Bolton, every single one of you is dead.

isnt he actually a bit average anyway?

Smeggers or Velcro - or both?

Nunchucks
451. Nunchucks Wrote: | 11.30GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to Nunchucks:

If Gary Megson manages to seduce Veloso to Bolton, every single one of you is dead.

isnt he actually a bit average anyway?

Not to my unpracticed eye.

Accomplished enough in the DM role that you can actually see what his contribution is to the game, unlike Didi Z.

He's also pretty handy as a CB, and LB, which someone told me are two positions where we are a bit special needs.

Nunchucks
452. Nunchucks Wrote: | 11.33GMT | Jan 28, 2009

But enough of this. We won't sign him.

But if he goes to Bolton, then we could have signed him.

And that will make me mildly annoyed. And you wouldn't like me when I'm mildly annoyed.

thfcwaynethfc
453. thfcwaynethfc Wrote: | 11.38GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

But enough of this. We won't sign him.

But if he goes to Bolton, then we could have signed him.

And that will make me mildly annoyed. And you wouldn't like me when I'm mildly annoyed.

agree with both your comments, i have seen him play a fee times and he looks an accomplished dm, him and palacious would be perfect in midfield especially for teams such as wigan/bolton/stoke etc. away. for 12 mill he would be a must for us.

i think there are positive times ahead;

i think BAE played really well last night and if he can brush up defensively could be an above agerage left back.

i also thought pav and defoe linked up very well last night.

modric - brilliant game, however he needs to get consistentcy, bolton away will be the test.

jolsgonemental
454. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 11.41GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Nunchucks:

But enough of this. We won't sign him.

But if he goes to Bolton, then we could have signed him.

And that will make me mildly annoyed. And you wouldn't like me when I'm mildly annoyed.

Ashley Young.

Andrei Arshavin.

Dont get Levy to pick your lottery numbers.


toddspur
455. toddspur Wrote: | 11.47GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to jolsgonemental:
Reply to robbieboy:

Hi guys, good result last nite, bout time, though it was stoke, a wins a win, and by god we needed a win.
Anyone know any goss on Fred and Appiah? Read the reports this morning, looks like Appiah's being lined up for a no from Arry. Cant understand why they dont just stick him on a pay as play...

Appiah isnt fit.

where would we play him?

Appiah is playing in the reserves against Reading tonight.

A decision to be made very soon.

anyone know where reserves are playing tonight, might drop by to check Appiah out

champagne_charlie
456. champagne_charlie Wrote: | 11.49GMT | Jan 28, 2009

I’ve been dumbfounded by the amount of abuse on here for a while. Some of it, you have to say, justifiable and others embarrassing. Obviously Harry knows what’s required.

Strike Force: We now have a pairing that is, starting to spark:
Pav. like many on here I love that boy…He’s got class. He’s got a deft touch.Vision. Attitude. Fight. And sure pace isn’t his strong-point but as someone on here once mentioned, when he sniffs the goal he turns into a machine!
Defoe. Going to Pompey’s been good for him. He has improved his game. Good with his back to goal and works hard off the ball. And when he sees that onion sack he gets a hard-on and wants to kick the shit out of it. He’s a yiddo.

Defence: Cudicini. A masterstroke on a free. Not just spectators but you can see the defenders around him feel confident he’ll make the right decision. Him and Gomes. Quality. Chimbonda say what you like is a decent defender anprovides cover for Charlie who can (ore than)cover for Ledlley and Palacios (maybe)


Midfield: Was meant to be our strength this season but has been the biggest problem. Palacios has been greeted with rumbles about his price how he is an Arsenal reject etc. We need a dynamo in midfield. And I’d say him and hopefully Appiah will be excellent acquisitions. The likes of Huddlestone and Zokora and Jenas will have to watch their backs.

Left midfield is a longstanding issue: But we have Lennon there, switching with Bentley and Jamie o’ Hara when fit. Bale can fill in too though I’m a little unsure).There’s Gio too.

Another striker would be nice but Bent and Campbell as back-up isn’t bad. Though can’t see Bent staying longer(I’m not a fan). A natural left winger too. But let’s forget the Stephen Hunts of this world and sign proper quality in the summer if we have to. We CAN make it with what we have.


Harry speaks of balance all the time and in my opinion we’re heading that way. The next weeks will tell.

Finally Modric is a Maestro. We must indulge him.

robbieboy
457. robbieboy Wrote: | 12.07GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Guys, check out this story on BBC website, talks about severity of Appiah's injury. Blood clots in the knees... Doesn't sound too good, and sounds like he's had problems there for a while. Playing on the injections could have ruined him, but it shows what kind of player he is - Heart - something we often lack. LINK

Ginge1
458. Ginge1 Wrote: | 12.07GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to jolsgonemental:

Reply to Nunchucks:

But enough of this. We won't sign him.

But if he goes to Bolton, then we could have signed him.

And that will make me mildly annoyed. And you wouldn't like me when I'm mildly annoyed.

Ashley Young.

Andrei Arshavin.

Dont get Levy to pick your lottery numbers.


Velose - is he any good, after all there only appears to be Bolton aftern him, are we really missing out or would he have been another Gilberto? Who knows but I won't lose any sleep over him. I watched him for Portugal and I didn't realise he was on the pitch until half time when I saw his name on the back of the shirt - however unlike a ref I like my midfielders to influence the game. Portugal's answer to JJ?

Ashley Young - Gutted we didn't get him, however a couple of my best mates are Villa fans and their descriptions are "small, lightweight, does one decent thing a game other than that just dissapears, not as great as everyone makes out, we will not miss him that much when he's suspended" - sounds like a typically over hyped Spurs player, lets be honest he's hardly beating the door down to the national team where a right footer who hardly gets a game for his club and Stewart Downing are in front of him

Smoothbum - Who knows, looks class in Russia and for the national side however he's another small lightweight player - could just see us playing a midfield of Modric, Zokora, AA & Lennon - we're only missing Vern & Jimmy Cranky to have the midget full sweep!

The grass is always greener my friend.

HenryPercy
459. HenryPercy Wrote: | 12.19GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Yay! Row 1 Carling cup final tickets!!

Nunchucks
460. Nunchucks Wrote: | 12.28GMT | Jan 28, 2009

Reply to Ginge1:

Reply to jolsgonemental:
Reply to Nunchucks:

But enough of this. We won't sign him.

But if he goes to Bolton, then we could have signed him.

And that will make me mildly annoyed. And you wouldn't like me when I'm mildly annoyed.

Ashley Young.

Andrei Arshavin.

Dont get Levy to pick your lottery numbers.


Velose - is he any good, after all there only appears to be Bolton aftern him, are we really missing out or would he have been another Gilberto? Who knows but I won't lose any sleep over him. I watched him for Portugal and I didn't realise he was on the pitch until half time when I saw his name on...

He's a defensive mid.

Arguably, you aren't supposed to notice him. Take Makelele, a tiny titan in his field, yet largely unsung due to his quiet industry.

The Bolton/Veloso connection isn't because Veloso is on Bolton's level. They're trying a sneaky pilfer while nobody's looking.

KOJAC
461. KOJAC Wrote: | 12.33GMT | Jan 28, 2009

last night's goals if the link works....

LINK

KOJAC
462. KOJAC Wrote: | 12.35GMT | Jan 28, 2009

one touch passing....thats what does the real damage....we ain't been doing it at all....

lamf1958
463. lamf1958 Wrote: | 21.56GMT | Jan 29, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to steve1987:
Reply to lamf1958:

COYS - well done for the 3 points, we can all go to bed happier than we've been all week. now hold that feeling and keep it going for the rest of the fecking season!

I going to bed and I'm going to be holding that feeling all night ...............I thank you!

We don't need to hear about your sex life

thats not what you told us over supper!

Leave a comment




(Don’t want to see this next time? Just sign up for an account.)