Thursday, 18 October 07, 10:36 AM
the euro cup comment is played out and stupid, everyone says that, so i guess teams from Africa, and countries like South Korea and USA have not contributed to the recent worlds, more specifically
2002 when both made quarterfinal appearances.They are both not from Europe, and while Mexico and other Iberian American countries just must fill up space then, How many great 2nd round games Mexico
has played against the USA, Argentina, Bulgaria to name a few recent ones. So I guess they add nothing to the world cup. look at how Argentina and Brasil crashed out, sure the power house countries
will always get calls and credit, Not every European team is great, many of them are all hype because they have a few star players, WOOOO, one player cant win a game, unless you're the great Diego!
so saying that just shows how much that person don't know about the world football. Very narrow minded.
I think Lempira's comment is something that was true a decade ago but certainly no longer. Mexico are building a strong side under Hugo Sanchez, while Uruguay gained some credit at the Copa America
too. The top African sides like Ghana, Senegal and Nigeria now have most of their players plying their trade in Europe (instead of playing their hearts out for decent contracts abroad like cameroon
in 1990 and nigeria in 94).
4 Comments
The Euro Cup is a World Cup without Argentina and Brazil!
football is unpredictable and the underdog always has a chance to win, it just takes one mental lapse or defense mistake to send the better team packing home. Thats why the sports are so interesting
and exciting, england is hype, Scotland has been playing better than 10 years ago. Egos are what i think destroys teams, Brasil great players, they should be stomping everyone but they are not, same
in England's case. but unlike Argentina were its players will live and die out on the field, thats what makes the difference "Heart". England don't have it.