Wednesday, 14 November 07, 09:06 AM · Comments(10)
It's certainly true with the US that they lack any serious league to play in and indeed many decent sides to play against in compeitive intrnationals. England can have no such complaints, like I said
when their leagues were full of English-born players in the 70s and 80s they won nothing. I think the english press actually has a storage room for excuses, 'Johnny Foreigner' rants take up a good
half of the room too.
Maybe if young English players weren't so coddled and insular and decided to play abroad like their young French and Spanish counterparts, we wouldn't even be having this discussion?
Very good point, always love seeing an english or irish player heading elsewhere in europe. You'd have to respect Steve McManaman for heading away to Madrid, learning the language and immersing
himself into the spanish way of life and football. Fair play to him. But what did he get in return? Besides for two european cups and two league titles... feck all England caps. Does it then just
come down to a basic mistrust of the foreign way of playing the game? Did Sven and his coaching staff feel that since he was passing instead of hoofing each week he just wouldn't fit in?
well - english or even british players do not have a good history abroad. hargreaves and beckham are the only ones with relative success. the better players such as owen, gazza, ian rush, mark
hughes, gary lineker, etc - have traditionally not fared well outside the english league.
I agree that England needs to encourage their players to go abroad. I also agree that we need to improve the academies and coaches. The English cannot be compared to Serie A, La Liga, or even Ligue 1
for that matter. But if you do look at La Liga, a big reason that the Spanish have not done well is because there are so many foreign players in the league and the top teams. Look at the influx of
players from South America. Yes our players need experience playing with the best, but the need playtime on the pitch. Serie A used to have a huge influx of foreign players and it handicapped the
national team back in the day. Now as world champions, the majority of players in the top teams and in the first division are Italian, including the coaches. Also Serie B and C are feeder systems to
the top league. They train and play similarly. Players from Serie A can regain form in B and C.
Something has to change for the England National Team to improve. If not quotas, then what?
Well forza, that's a huge question, involving all sorts of matters from school curriculum, to getting fat kids off couches, bringing in foreign coaches (ie people who have heard of that mystical
thing called 'a pass') at FA academies, as well as a load of other initiatives that I can't even think of - to be honest Ireland needs that approach as well but Government money isn't overly fair
towards soccer at times here. Quotas are the short, wrong and vaguely racist route (if anyone says these comments from the press and even some players aren't routed in the 'little englander' psyche
they must be in denial).
Also, I wouldn't say foreign players overly handicapped Italy - WC final in 94, WC Qf in 98 (going out in pens to the winners), euro final in 2000 and of course last
year's win. A lot more finals than England ever got to.
a quota is not the answer. all it will do is reduce the quality in the prem. why should clubs bear the brunt of this problem? its not their problem, its the FA's problem. I agree that english coaches
and managers are largely at fault. england's favorite word is "endeavor" - what about skill? a lot has been said about the english work rate but who was the last successful english manager outside
the UK? english players' skills and technique is just not up there. rooney is unanimously the torch carrier for england - but if he was brazilian, italian, french, argentinian or whatever football
superpower - would he start?
10 Comments · Add yours
Excellent analysis, and I'd have to agree that its highly unlikely this would in any way benefit the national team. You want your national players to compete against the best, and one of the things
I'd point out as to why the USA does so poorly is because their players don't play at the highest level when they are in MLS.
Of course, some of the reaction coming out of England could be
influenced by the Italian World Cup side, since the entire team did in fact play in the Serie A that season. But I would attribute their success more to having a lot of the players on that team
playing together on the same club team for a whole year. Buffon & Cannavaro played together, as did Maldini & Nesta I think.
It's certainly true with the US that they lack any serious league to play in and indeed many decent sides to play against in compeitive intrnationals. England can have no such complaints, like I said
when their leagues were full of English-born players in the 70s and 80s they won nothing. I think the english press actually has a storage room for excuses, 'Johnny Foreigner' rants take up a good
half of the room too.