<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>LadyArse</title><subtitle type="html"><![CDATA[Arsenal and the world of football from a woman&#039;s perspective]]></subtitle><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse"/><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Let&#039;s Stoke Some Fires]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/let039s-stoke-some-fires"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Can I just ask how long a defeated manager is supposed to wait to shake the opposing manager's hand? Is he supposed to idle by the side of the pitch until Mark Hughes has finished celebrating
      and then deems it time to shake Wenger's hand, or should Hughes have done the handshake first and then celebrated as if he'd won the league?<br />
      <br />
      It's an absolute joke that Hughes has a go at Wenger when he shows him nothing but disrespect and then expects Wenger to wait on him. Mark Hughes demands the respect it has taken the Wenger's
      and Ferguson's of this world over a decade of winning trophies to be gained. He may be able to buy his squad, by Sparky is quickly finding out that money can't buy you the one thing he craves
      the most - respect.<br />
      <br />
      Who else here would have hung around? Wenger gave City more than enough credit for their victory in his press conference afterwards and never once lowered himself to take issue with Hughes'
      childish and intimidating behaviour throughout the whole match, a somewhat greater transgression than not waiting to shake a hand.<br />
      <br />
      But then, 'Mark Hughes rants like a demented schoolchild' doesn't generate as many sales in the red-tops as one about Wenger being a bad loser.<br />
      <br />
      Where are the headlines screaming about Hughes calling Wenger 'A fucking wanker' as Hughes stood in the ARSENAL technical area? If it had been the other way around no doubt the papers would be
      calling for a lifetime ban for Wenger.<br />
      <br />
      Wengers pre-Stoke interview was 'interesting' "We play the FA Cup this year and we go for it" - does that imply that in previous years we haven't been going for it? Is that proof that his
      decision to leave Arshavin on the bench in the semi last year was because he put fourth place and a two-legged semi against Man U in the Champions League ahead of the chance to get to the final
      in the FA Cup? He was then asked if we're really going to go for it this year and he replied "We go for the FA Cup every year" but his huge shoulder shrug at the time of speaking betrayed his
      words. We haven't 'went for it' every year, not since the most god-awful final against Man U when we won on penalties anyway.<br />
      <br />
      His press-conference was even better. He admitted, admirably, and very frankly that he is a bad loser, but also stated that he would not have shaken Mark Hughes hand even if we had won the
      game. What he says matters, and I happen to agree, is not the 'ceremonial' handshake at the end of a match but rather your conduct throughout it. How is he worse than a man who called him a
      'fucking wanker' for not shaking that man's hand afterwards?
    </p>
    <p>
      It's absolutely absurd and another indication how the actions of Arsenal are held up to a far higher standard of scrutiny than that of any other club in the league. A standard which is almost
      impossible to meet. Had Ferguson done the same, no doubt the papers would be full of stories about how he had every right to refuse a handshake when he had been taunted by the opposing manager
      for 90 minutes. Especially if that manager had been a foreign one. You look at Wenger's treatment at Old Trafford by both officials and fans, then look at the verbal assaults and intimidation
      Ferguson is allowed to get away with on a weekly basis. Only when he says something wrong in an interview do the FA think about doing anything about it. Benetiz was right in his 'rant' that you
      need to man-mark the Man United technical staff because they are constantly in the face of the fourth official and surround the linesmen and referee the first opportunity they get. Something, I
      might add, Moanchester City are doing more and more themselves.<br />
      <br />
      Look at how Eduardo was treated compared to Ronaldo, Drogba, Gerrard or Rooney. How our fans got a lot of the blame for the ex-25's celebration when opposing fans have been chanting vile abuse
      at our players and manager for as long as anyone can remember. Look at what we do and don't get on the pitch compared to the other 'big' teams - more yellow cards for less fouls, more fouls
      against yet less free kicks, and not a sniff of a penalty despite several GBH's in the box, since August and the ITV-led crusade against Eduardo.<br />
      <br />
      To his credit, even when questioned directly about the comment 'alleged' to have been made by Hughes Wenger refused to confirm or deny, simply saying that you will not hear him say anything
      about another manager. The fact that other managers have called his gesture 'childish' and 'ungracious' (another question put to Wenger asking if he agreed with that) and you have to wonder
      what really is the 'childish' act? Refusing to shake hands with someone who has taunted you for 90 minutes (after all, according to Mark Hughes, the ex-25 had every right to celebrate the way
      he did on our first match against them this season for that very reason, so would Wenger have been entitled to go screaming in Mark Hughes face?) or deliberately trying to goad a fellow
      manager, while strutting in front of him, well outside your own technical area and hurling obscenities. Wenger doesn't regret what he does, and the more I hear people going on about it I wish
      he could go back and not shake his hand even more. How you would do that, I don't really know. First of all there's the whole time travel issue, but putting that aside, how do you 'not' do
      something more than you already haven't done it? Any quantum physicists around? Surely that holds the key.<br />
      <br />
      And he had a go at another journalist, this time for keeping asking the same question over and over, even though Wenger stressed he had already answered it. 'Do you really listen to what I say
      because if you do let's go to the next question' Love it, Wenger a few years back would never have been so direct, or am I just forgetting? Maybe I didn't pay as much attention to press
      conferences then as I do now. Who knows. Whatever it is, I love it. I love the Wenger of this year when he's being interviewed by the press. He has become the master and owns every conference
      he attends (apart from anomalies such as last week after Chelsea when he made very little sense.)<br />
      <br />
      When asked if we would be buying Balotelli, instead of his last season answer which would have been 'I won't confirm or deny who we are interested in' he simply said 'No, we are not interested
      in Ballotelli, you can write that, and Chelsea can buy him as many times as they like. I read that we are in competition with Chelsea to sign the player, that is not true'. You can't really get
      much clearer than that can you? No doubt we'll be linked with buying him next week. And the week after, and every week between now and January 31st or until someone else does.<br />
      <br />
      We won't be buying Dzeko either as he's apparently too expensive while it looks like we'll have to wait til the summer for Chamakh as his club won't be selling him in January, Zenzinho the 17
      year old it is then...<br />
      <br />
      I must say, recent results aside, Arsene seemed in far better spirits than he has done. He says the team are disheartened at the minute and that concerns me as we have a mental strength even
      more prone to break down than our players bodies, but his relaxed manner wen't some way to settling some of my concerns. He even had a giggle when asked about Arshavin's comments, saying how he
      loved him as a player and as a man, and left one journalist swinging in the wind after simply answering 'yes I do' to the question of whether Stoke was must win or not. 'Yes I do' and then a
      big grin as the journo scrambled to think of another question. Superb.<br />
      <br />
      Stoke is a huge match for us. Yes we beat them 4-1 last season, but they are a very well organised, disciplined and effective team. Given the fact that we concede a goal almost every time a
      ball is shot on target we have to ensure that either Almunia isn't playing or that the entire team close down every inch of the pitch to limit shooting chances. Both would be ideal. Never mind
      dealing with Delap’s long throws, we need to be dealing with the second balls which is invariably where our main problems come from. A big hoof will do very nicely thank you very much - away
      from goal, not just into the air so it comes back down inside our box. AWAY.<br />
      <br />
      Sagna is confirmed fit, Walcott confirmed injured, Diaby, Bendtner and Clichy are 'shorter' confirming my spine-shortening theory and progressing us ever closer to our Pygmy army. Our team
      pretty much picks itself.<br />
      <br />
      VP's surgery has went very, very well apparently, although Wenger hasn't talked to him, just his surgeons. He does that doesn't he, when a player is injured he doesn't seem to have much to do
      with them, instead solely focusing on those who are fit I guess that's the way to do it and that's why we have medical staff. Still, where's the love Arsene?<br />
      <br />
      Interestingly, perhaps even foolishly, I got rather excited when pressed on how many players we would be after in January, would it solely be a striker, Wenger refused to clarify how many
      players we'd be after. Like most, I know what we need, and I would sacrifice getting a striker for a keeper.<br />
      <br />
      The match v Stoke is our 100th at the Emirates and Arsene's 500th game in charge. Anything less than a win to celebrate would jst be plain rude. 3 points please, thank you very much.<br />
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-12-05 04:11:38</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[March of the Pygmies]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/march-of-the-pygmies"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      With December upon us the madness that is January's transfer window is beathing heavily upon us. All manner of folks are, as usual, being linked with us, none of whom we'll sign. This time,
      however, it's even worse as Wenger has stated he's going to buy. Does anyone else think that he has the deal already sorted otherwise he'd be playing the 'we're good enough/don't want to
      unsettle the youngsters' card?<br />
      <br />
      The most constant, and seemingly constant 'rumour' is that we've already signed the Brazillian Zezinho. I don't know much about him, but he has two 'Z's in his name and that has to mean he's
      good. Watched some clips of him online and he looks pretty sharp, but he's 17.&nbsp; 'gunnerz4ever' on Arsenal Mania forum also had this to add; "£5 million for Zezinho apparently looks like
      another midget Wenger is building a pygmy army."<br />
      <br />
      I think it was another five minutes before I could compose myself. Pygmy Army! He bloody well is! Clichy and Denilson haven't been out with broken backs, they've been getting their spines
      shortened so they don't loose their place. And don't you buy that crap about severed tendons where RVP has concerned, all the time he's been away, I imagine Wenger has been having him gradually
      miniaturised and when he comes back he'll have shed his tall person suit and be the perfect Wenger striker at 2'3".<br />
      <br />
      Pygmies lol.
    </p>
    <p>
      <br />
      He's 5'11" just in case you were wondering.
    </p>
    <p>
      It's goood to see that consensus is growing that we need a keeper (Akinfeev) and despite all the names being bandied about, I actually don't care (Akinfeev) who we buy. ANY keeper(Akinfeev)
      would be an improvement, Mannone proved that. We have faced 52 shots this season, and conceded 18 goals. Only Portsmouth, Wigan, Hull, and Burnley have a worse record than us. Yet only Chelsea
      and Fulham have faced fewer shots.<br />
      <br />
      It isn't the defence. IT'S THE KEEPER (though our defence could try defending just a wee bit better).<br />
      <br />
      In November, we allowed eight shots. That's pretty impressive, implying the defense are doing their job relatively well. How many goals did we concede? Five. Five fucking goals from eight
      shots.<br />
      <br />
      To have figures like that is a disgrace. To compare, Chelsea have faced only 34 shots and conceded 8 goals, a ratio that works out at 34.6% to their 23.5% (did you see their blocked shots stats
      v us on Sunday? We had seven blocked shots by them, we managed to block one of theirs). So, not only are their defenders closing down attackers more than we are, they also have a keeper who
      knows what he's supposed to be doing.<br />
      <br />
      Blah. It's enough to get you concerned about the visit of Stoke. I think I might throw something at my TV (or just fall on top of it) if Almunia starts on Saturday. And if, please, please,
      please, he doesn't, we can assume he has been rightly dropped and cling to the hope that Wenger might do something about it and shit ourselves accordingly as Fabianski implodes? There is, off
      course, always the very real possibility that Wenger might be happy to have Fab as number 1 and Almunia and number 2.<br />
      <br />
      Something has definitely changed with the Spanish waiter this season, there can be no denying it. The whole 'chest infection/death in the family' business smacked so much of a cover-up I was
      supprised not to hear mention of a grassy knoll. Whether he's had a fight with the boss, a team-mate or his pink dog, I don't really care, what I care about is getting him the hell out of our
      team. The unpredictibility of youth? Bloody right when it's up against the unpredicitibility of a liability. Maybe he's mimicking the other England goalies in a bid to get to the World Cup? Who
      the hell knows, but it's something and it's irritating the crap clean out of me.<br />
      <br />
      Urrgh, I've depressed myself now. Started this blog because I just simply had to repeat the whole pygmies thing and now look where I've ended up.<br />
      <br />
      Bloody Almunia.<br />
      <br />
      Pygmies hehe.<br />
      <br />
      That's better.<br />
      <br />
      So what else? Not much really. Theo is out with a 'slight' hamstring so that's him gone til the end of February. Probably just as well, would have only got injured against Stoke anyway. Wonder
      does he know if he doesn't have the ball people won't tackle him so that's why he leaves it behind so often? Sagna's ankle knock has recovered enough for him to start unless his foot falls off
      between now and tomorrow, and apart from that, we have no more injuries to report. The joy of playing the kids in the Carling Cup and no Diaby in training.<br />
      <br />
      I'll take a look at the likely team tomorrow but for now I'm off to think of pygmies.. I've no idea why it's so funny, but it just is. The French Emperor and his army of Pygmies - tripping over
      all who come before them.<br />
      <br />
      Well, it could work....<br />
      <br />
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-12-04 02:07:25</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Cash beats class but Arsenal fans don&#039;t despair]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/cash-beats-class-but-arsenal-fans-don039t-despair"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[Arsenal entered their Carling Cup quarter final with odds of 3/1 for a win. Even given the fact that we were fielding a team consisting mostly of reserves and kids, 3/1 still gave us very little
    chance. You know you never meet a poor bookie.<br />
    <br />
    Pre match, the ex-25 was strutting about the park as if he actually was worth £25million. Jamie Redknapp's pre-match ponderings about where his form had gone since the start of the season was
    just laughable. Ask any Arsenal fan where his form has gone and they'll tell you he only has form when he wants more money. There isn't an Arsenal fan on the planet who didn't fortell the story
    of the ex-25 and the ever-increasing laziness he would become afflicted with as the season wore on. To be fair to him, he started with purpose, giving away the first free kick by fouling Rosicky
    after trying to take out Wilshere and missing. We would end the night on 6 yellows to their two. And the ex-25 would not be one of theirs booked.<br />
    <br />
    In a first half which saw Man City carve out most of the chances, we also saw, yet again, Traore booked for his first foul while just before Tevez had two hacks at Rosicky, one of them
    connecting, without punishment. There was a ball that Silvestre (who played impressively well in the first half) and the ex 25 went for, while Silvestre was always going to get it, the ex-25
    thought two footed was the way to go. He didn't connect, but add that to the one at the weekend v Hull, the stamp on Cesc and Vp, and it won't be long before he ends someones career.<br />
    <br />
    To be honest, I think the reason the ex-25 wasn't working or fouling as much as we expected was because he was insulted by the team we sent to play him. He knows had he still been at the Emirates
    he would not be playing. I wonder if it was because he was up against his 'old friend' Song and had time to ponder how much his actions and assaults on Song might have effected the young chap.
    More likely there was no-one he wanted to kick badly enough to mean he had to run.<br />
    <br />
    The second half started and our defensive instructions had obviously been to stand off Man City and allow them as much time and space as they need to shoot and find the top corner. Five minutes
    it took us to follow those instructions. A brief scurry up the other end and then it was basketball, you have a go, we have a go and we see who holds longest.<br />
    <br />
    And we know how that goes. And went.<br />
    <br />
    Scoreline aside the kids did well against £200million worth of talent at home. People might criticse Arsene for not using more experience when this could be the chance of a trophy, but if it
    wasn't for Arsene and his youth policy nobody would even remember this trophy existed. The kids tired and only making one substitution as we had no other offensive options on the bench it was
    inevitible the young legs would tire. It took that before Man City could beat us properly.<br />
    <br />
    Merida was disappointing, Vela caused trouble, while Jack didn't get the ball enough. Eastmond wasn't as effective as he has been, but Song owned the ex-25 at centre-half, hell, even Silvestre
    for the most part played really well. Predictibly, Man City targeted Traore with Wright-Phillips but the defender stood strong (as he could after getting a yellow early on). Ramsey tired badly in
    the second half, while Rosicky struggled to keep things moving on his own. Eboue was Eboue.<br />
    <br />
    An added plus was that Fabianksi did what he had to do, and apart from one which he came for and just missed (at least he was in the general vicinity of the ball unlike the Spanish Waiter who'd
    only be going for the cross now). He had no chance and was at no fault for any of the three goals and looked confident and assured. Well, by Arsenal keeper standards at least.<br />
    <br />
    And as for Mark Hughes gurning that Wenger didn't wait for him to shake his hand, why the hell should he? If Hughes is off celebrating why the hell should Wenger hang about for him? Is that a new
    law? Moanchester City and their newly purchased sense of entitlement. Wenger gave them credit for their goals, their quality and their experience in his post-match interview, but I bet all you
    hear about is how he is an ungracious loser who wouldn't shake Hughes' hand. His response, when told that Mark Hughes had said he didn't know how to lose, was perfect 'I am free to shake hands
    with whoever I want.'&nbsp; Mark Hughes wants the respect that has taken the Wengers and Ferguson's of this world 10 plus years of winning things to earn. That's something you can't buy Mark, and
    no amount of crying will change that.<br />
    <br />
    I'm writing this just after the match and have seen some comments on Twitter which have wound me up. Not Man City fans, but supposed Arsenal ones crying about the end of our season and how we'll
    never win a trophy.&nbsp; There's a bit of a rant on it's way.<br />
    <br />
    Nobody outside the top 4 gives a fuck if they win the Carling Cup or not. If they do, it's a bonus, if they don't they don't care. I'm sick of all this shit about this now being a trophy we can't
    win. It's a trophy I don't care if we win. What are we going to do, win it and then brag about it like the Spuds did? Give me a fucking break. What would Man City rather be in, Champions League
    or Carling Cup?<br />
    <br />
    Some fans go on about this four fucking years without a trophy as if it's four decades. Catch a bloody grip of yourselves. Half of you haven't got a clue what it was like pre-Wenger and as I've
    said before, if it wasn't for Wenger you wouldn't even be expecting to win trophies like you do, let alone thinking we have some divine right to them.<br />
    <br />
    I don't know, maybe I'm mad or something, but the result against City didn't bother me in the slightest. It cost us nothing in the legaue (except Song who will miss Stoke through suspension for
    accumulating 5 yellows), no injuries at a time when we're stretched to the limit, and some great time and saves from a goalkeeper who needs match-time and confidence if we are to have any chance
    of getting rid of Almunia.<br />
    <br />
    Sure, it isn't nice to lose, and it isn't nice to lose 3-0, but let's have some perspective. You don't go and play tennis against Roger Federer and cry when you lose 6-0 6-0 6-0. We knew what
    side we were putting out, it isn't like this is a new policy or anything, we know what Wenger thinks of the Carling Cup, if you chose to believe this is a competition we have a good chance of
    winning that's your issue for being a muppet. You might say that it is time he changes his policy on the Carling Cup but he won't and no amount of moaning about that will change that. If we do
    ever happen to win it will be an amazing achievement, but the Carling Cup, under Wenger, will never be a trophy we will try and win with a first team. Accept it.<br />
    <br />
    Should we? I don't know. I really don't care about the Carling Cup and really look forward to seeing how far the kids can go each season. It's an entertaining and distracting side-show to the
    trauma of watching the first-team at times. Imagine the first team playing tonight and losing? How gutted would you feel then? Ah but we wouldn't have lost if we'd played the first team you say.
    I say you don't know shit. Any team can lose any match at any time. Especially in a cup. A first team no more guarantees winning this trophy than it does winning any other. You might think it
    gives us more of a chance but I say it gives us more of a chance of losing players we'll need for the league, Champions League and FA Cup.<br />
    <br />
    So before you all start attacking me for my opinion on this latest defeat, let me just claify some things. Yes I care we lost. No I won't subscribe to the view that our season is falling apart.
    Yes I would like to win a trophy. No, I don't care if it's the Carling Cup (though the quarter final against Man U's kids would have been quite the contest). Yes I think Wenger is right to
    continue playing the kids. No, I don't think he should change that.<br />
    <br />
    World class young talent comes to Arsenal because they know they will get to play and won't rot in the reserves. We can't spend £30, 40, 50 million on a player, but we can get a player who has
    £50 million potential and mould him in the Arsenal way. If the Carling Cup helps maintain that ability, the attraction to youngsters such as Cesc Fabregas, Gael Clichy, Kieran Gibbs, Carlos Vela,
    Jack Wilshere, Fran Merida, Sanchez Watt, Craig Eastmond, Kyle Bartley and the rest then I for one say it is a sacrifice worth making and I'm all for using it the way we do.<br />
    <br />
    And, let's face it, with our squad stretched and fragile, do you really think the first team has a chance of sustaining an attack on four fronts? Or would the other three suffer for the addition
    of the fourth? You know in your head what the answer to that is.<br />
    <br />
    Now let the attacks commence....]]></content><updated>2009-12-02 16:47:41</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[FIFA Show they are as stupid as UEFA as they consider banning Henry]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/fifa-show-they-are-as-stupid-as-uefa-as-they-consider-banning-henry"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Regardless of your view of 'Henry'gate,' for Arsenal fans, the news that FIFA are to investigate his handball with views towards possibly banning him from the start of the World Cup group
      matches must surely resonate after how Eduardo was treated.
    </p>
    <p>
      While the line between Eduardo and Henry is vast (one is dubious, the other clear cheating) the fact is both were charged after the event using video evidence FIFA/UEFA refuse to allow during
      the original 90 minutes and plan to punish the player with a punishement far in excess of what would have happened had the referee spotted the incident.
    </p>
    <p>
      It's simply absurd. Eduardo's three-match ban (for a yellow card offence, a six-fold increase in punishment for an error by an official (if you think he dived)) was rightly overturned, but such
      was the outcry about Henry that I fear he will not be so lucky. I didn't think the media could get more hysterical than they did with Eduardo, but the surpassed themselves with Henry.
    </p>
    <p>
      FIFA are well within their rights to look at the incident, afterall, their own rules state that they are free to do so if the ref missed something and it wasn't included in the match report.
      But how can they issue anything other than the punishment he would have got had it been spotted at the time - a yellow card?
    </p>
    <p>
      FIFA and UEFA are rapidly descending into an even bigger joke than we already knew they were. Logic dictates that Henry should, at most, get a retrospective yellow. The masses however, might
      dictate something far more substantial altogether.
    </p>
    <p>
      If a six-fold punishment is issued (ie a 3 game ban), FIFA must follow suit with EVERY single yellow-card offence not seen by the officials. That's an awful lot of bans for an awful lot of
      players. Will they open that can or do their best to slam it shut?
    </p>
    <p>
      Read more for yourself <a href="http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5740860,00.html">here</a> and make up your own mind.
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-12-02 11:36:08</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Man City v Arsenal - it&#039;s anyones guess how it&#039;ll go]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/man-city-v-arsenal---it039s-anyones-guess-how-it039ll-go"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[Well, well, busy day today. Not only do we have a match, but I finally have a diagnosis as to why I've been walking like a drunk person for the past month. While it's good to finally know what it
    is, the fact that it means a lifetime of meds and the very real possibility of going deaf in my right ear doesn't make for the best start of the day. At least I won't have to listen to Spud fans
    (I'm not laughing at them getting beaten by Man U's kids cause I know what happens when I mock - should we negotitate the rather tricky business of an ex-25 inspired thugfest at Eastlands, then I
    shall gloat myself silly.)<br />
    <br />
    So, Man City it is. I must say, I don't really expect us to get anything out of this match, You can say what you like about Man City drawing games left right and centre, but as the ex-25 says (I
    shall paraphrase) the height of his season so far came against Arsenal and it's been all down hill for him from there (he yaps on about an injury but I remember no such injury). Another match
    against Arsenal gives him the perfect opportunity to get his lazy ass in gear, if only for 90 minutes so he can then coast through until at least February on the back of another good performance
    against us.<br />
    <br />
    Normally, I rate our chances against anyone, but knowing how many kids we'll be playing added to the fact that it is away at a club who have the chance of getting to a semi-final for the first
    time in 356 years, they have all the incentive. That being said, anyone who has watched the kids this year cannot help but be impressed by the commitment they show when they get their chance and
    I expect a hard-fought contest, possibly only decided by the odd-goal.<br />
    <br />
    In defence we know we'll see Fabianski (as our Carling Cup keeper Chesney is out on loan and Fab needs some fitness - fast- to displace our 'number one' god I wish I could make those '' bigger).
    Senderos and Silvestre are expected to come in, but as Senderos can't even get on the bench for the first team will we see Kyle Bartley step in as Senderos counts the days he has left as an
    Arsenal player? (I wrote that before I remembered the squad was being announced today and I see Big Phil isn't even included - byebye it is then).<br />
    <br />
    In midfield, it's anyone's guess...with Song being subbed at the weekend I wondered if we'd see him against Man City and he is indeed named in the squad. Is that simply to wind up the ex-25 as we
    know on their last international meeting the ex-25 had to be subbed as all he was interested in was crocking Song. Let's hope who ever is reffing this match has some balls, as the ex-25 already
    got away with another blatant stamp at the weekend against Hull and I think it's safe to say we will see more of the same tonight.<br />
    <br />
    The squd for the match is as follows:<br />
    Tomas Rosicky<br />
    Carlos Vela<br />
    Aaron Ramsey<br />
    Alex Song<br />
    Mikael Silvestre<br />
    Jack Wilshere<br />
    Lukasz Fabianski (GK)<br />
    Vito Mannone (GK)<br />
    Emmanuel Eboue<br />
    Armand Traore<br />
    Fran Merida<br />
    Kyle Bartley<br />
    Francis Coquelin<br />
    Craig Eastmond<br />
    Emmanuel Frimpong<br />
    Kerrea Gilbert<br />
    Mark Randall<br />
    Sanchez Watt<br />
    <br />
    So I think the team I'd like to see start could be something like this:<br />
    <br />
    Fabianksi<br />
    <br />
    Eboue Silvestre Bartley Gilbert<br />
    Song<br />
    Ramsey Merida<br />
    Wilshere Vela Rocisky<br />
    <br />
    That isn't a half bad team, but I don't trust Silvestre to handle the ex-25 so let's hope Bartley can step up and kick him lots.<br />
    <br />
    That all being said, Eastmond so impressed in his last game we could see him start ahead of Song with Alex being brought in if we're in trouble. Who knows. The team could be anything. Watt
    deserves a start as well, but Vela needs the matches. Basically, it's anyones guess.<br />
    <br />
    Gonna leave it there, the trip to the hospital and all the tests they did involved spinning my head loads which needless to say has taken it's toll.<br />
    <br />
    Here's to another demolition job by the kids, though this game could finish anything from 1-0 to 5-4...(order of scores does not indicate home wins, I just can't call this match at all -
    afterall, for all we know, the Man City players could be on a £1m bonus to win it)<br />
    &nbsp;<br />
    Class over cash - Come on you Gunnnnerrrrrrrrrrssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!]]></content><updated>2009-12-02 06:51:39</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Tuesday Blues + COMPETITION WINNER]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/tuesday-blues--competition-winner"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[Morning all.<br />
    <br />
    So, it's Tuesday. As I'm still housebound I have managed to restrict my in take of post-mortem and slagging to a minimum but I'm sure some of you out there endured a rough day yesterday at the
    hands of, well, probably everybody who isn't an Arsenal fan. Just keep reminding yourself that nothing's handed out in May and if you can punch where appropriate it will help a great deal.<br />
    <br />
    News-wise, there isn't really that much of substance about. The Arsenal official site spat out page after page of filler yesteday in a desperate bid to remove the fact that they had the
    'highlights' of the game v Cheslea listed on the home page in the hope that we might somehow forget what had happened the day before.<br />
    <br />
    We didn't.<br />
    <br />
    Anyone who watched Wenger's press conference or read it's transcirpt on the offical site could not help but be struck by how rambley the boss seemed. A lot of what he was saying made no sense,
    and in a season where we have seen him be more frank and forthcoming with the press than he has ever been, it was an interesting turn. Is the stress getting to great man? Was it dissapointment
    that he had went out on such a huge limb and said that this team was ready, that they would deliver and they failed? To be fair, we should judge his statements against where we stand in May,
    still, it is something else to add to our growing list of concerns?<br />
    <br />
    What did strike me about coverage after the match, was how quickly the pundits have seem to realised we are ravaged with injuries. At a time in the season when we probably have more fit players
    than we have had at any other time since the season began, it's nice of them to try and make excuses for us (in some quarters, in others they took great joy in laughing at our 'boys') but do we
    need them? Yes RVP is a huge loss, especially when exacerbated by the injury to Bendtner, but let's not forget, Bendter was not exactly setting the world alight, where as before his latest
    operation, it seemed Eduardo hit the back of the net everytime he could get on the pitch to touch the ball. Now he can't even trap it. We may have lost Gibbs as well as Traore, but none of
    Chelseas goals came from anywhere near our left so that can't be a factor either. To quote Diaby as a 'loss' from the squad when there was no mention of Denilson when he was out is just
    lunacy.<br />
    <br />
    I still rest the blame for our defensive frailties squarely at the feet of our goalkeeper. Last year we were able to blame the warring centrebacks and not-as-expected performances from our
    full-backs, but did that simply mask Almunia as well?<br />
    <br />
    What difference would it have made had we had a keeper who came to where Drogba flicked the ball in for the first and took him out with it? What price a keeper who wasn't coming to collect a ball
    which was heading straight for both our centre backs? Or a keeper who can react and therefore doesn't have to guess which was a free-kick is going to go? One who comes and collect balls without
    having to have 60,000 fans scream for him to do so?<br />
    <br />
    No doubt up front is playing a part too. Wenger invested a lot into making VP a CF, a move not many of us saw any potential in. The team has played with him as their focal point, seemingly
    oblivious to the fact that he is made of glass and acted as if they never expected to have to supply any one else in that position. Why can't we play Arshavin there? He has stated he wanted to
    play more centrally, and, as was pointed out on Sunday Supplement, when we played Henry we pretty much played without a centre forward as he was always deep or left or right and we relied on
    runners or wide men. Or Henry. How are we not able to adjust our play to accomodate the loss of one man?<br />
    <br />
    To get things in some sort of perspective, we have to look at the fact that we failed to score against two very well organised defences. Sunderland is never an easy place to go, let alone after
    an international break and without our main man for the first time all season. Chelsea have the best defence in the league, and while we should, as title contenders (if we wish to be considered
    as such) be able to break them down, but yet are not be guaranteed to do so. There was a few times when we could have gotten in, a better touch from Eduardo, a less slicker surface, we could have
    done it. We didn't. It isn't the end of the world and it doesn't mean we aren't going to score again this season.<br />
    <br />
    And it hasn't got as much to do with injuries as the press would have you believe.<br />
    <br />
    It's about self-belief. It's about fear. It's got nothing to do with the height or weight of our players. Once again it's a mental problem, and I find that more worrying than any physical
    aspect.<br />
    <br />
    Wenger admitted it himself, the defeat at Sunderland had affected their confidence more deeply than he had realised. So did they enter the game against Chelsea with the 'we can't beat Sunderland
    how the hell are we going to beat Chelsea' mindset?<br />
    <br />
    I'm rambling again, I know it. I think a big part of that is the inner conflict which is raging inside me over the whole Great November Disintegration. Which isn't even that great to be honest.
    Or a disintegration. Yet. I don't know what to make of the whole thing. The Arsenal I have watched all season is not the one I have seen this last few weeks. Two goals in three games since losing
    VP from a team who can boast 13 different scorers already. How can that be? I get confused when I don't understand, and I ramble and contradict myself as I try and make sense of it all.<br />
    <br />
    I so wanted to believe in Arsenal this year, and a huge part of me did, still does, and always will. It's that part as a supporter that tells you we can still win the league until it is
    mathematically impossible even when the bookies have you at 150/1. But then there's the other part, the hurt part, the part that was damaged against Man U in the Champions League after taking a
    kicking all through the start of last season, all on the back of capitulating the league to Man U the year before after the loss of Edurdo's leg and Gallas's senses. It still hurts and it doesn't
    want to be fooled any more.<br />
    <br />
    Hence the conflict and the rambling.<br />
    <br />
    So, do yourself a favour, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g5t0s_Fn9s">watch the fighting equivalent of Arsenal v Cheslea</a> and have a chuckle at how accurate the reflection is (thanks
    to lonelygunner for the link) and then console yourself with the knowledge that the guy who got flattened is apparently an amazing fighter who just got a bit flashy for his own good and got
    cold-cocked. If you don't see the humour in it, you're gonna have one hell of a long season. Laugh, it will do you good.<br />
    <br />
    Now we can move on.<br />
    <br />
    November is dead, now it's time for the Arsenal to shine once again and show the doubters just who we are, and what we are really capable of. Another 20 unbeaten anyone? Oh, and a new keeper
    would be appreciated as well, thanks Arsene.<br />
    <br />
    .......<br />
    <br />
    The winner of the competition, who could have won for sheer volume of great entries alone, came up with a cracker (Which I've slightly ammended). The rest of you should hang your head in shame as
    this guy's a Liverpool fan! I did wonder what use a Liverpool fan could have for an Arsenal TShirt fearturing our captain, until I figured it was the only way they could get themselves a fit
    world-class midfielder (you know I'm only mesin)...so...step forward NEVERWALKINGALONE for you are indeed the winner of the first ever LadyArse competition for your (slightly tweaked)<br />
    <br />
    A Brazilian or an Arshavin?<br />
    <br />
    So if you could kindly email me your address I'll get your Cescy Tshirt in the post and you can be the envy of Merseyside.<br />
    <br />
    There were some cracking entries and I'm sorry I only have one TShirt to spare.<br />
    Thanks to everyone who took part, I'll get another one going as soon as I can.]]></content><updated>2009-12-01 06:02:20</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Arsenal v Chelsea...blah blah blah]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/arsenal-v-chelseablah-blah-blah"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Right, let's get some things out of the way before we go in to a proper analysis. And before you say I'm going to sugar coat things to try and make it look like that wasn't an embarrasment, I
      won't be.
    </p>
    <p>
      Honesty is what is needed.<br />
      <br />
      First off, Chelsea did not deserve to beat us by three goals yesterday. Our keeper should have saved the third, the second was unfortunate (why didn't the keeper come out for it?) and their
      first was well worked by an in form striker getting between our two centre-halves. Would it have made a difference if Arshavin's goal had been allowed to stand? Yes it would have, it would have
      given the team belief that this Cheslea side aren't indestructible as some people are saying. Should it have stood? Most definately. Cech didn't have his hands on the ball, it was not under his
      control, and (I thought) Eduardo's foot played the ball without being any danger to Cech. The call to disallow this goal is basically like saying you can't challenge a keeper if it looks like
      the ball is going to land in his hands. An absolutely ridiculous decision. However, Wenger was convinced it was a Chelsea boot that clipped the ball to Arshavin. I haven't watched a replay and
      I don't think I want to.<br />
      <br />
      Were Chelsea allowed to foul us all over the pitch with little or no punishment from the ref? Yes they were. Did Vermaelen do better with Drogba than Toure? You better believe he did.<br />
      <br />
      We did not deserve to lose this match. Yet we did. No longer can we keep moaning about matches in which we play the better football, be the better team, but end up licking our wounds as the
      other team celebrate the points.<br />
      <br />
      I honestly didn't think that VP's losss would effect us as much as it had. What has happened to Eduardo since his last operation I don't know, but he just can't control a ball, even when under
      no pressure.<br />
      <br />
      The decision to take of Song to put on Theo was right in theory, wrong in execution. Song in our strongest player in the middle of the pitch and Denilson has only just returned from a long term
      injury. Would Song have made a difference? Possibly, he's a fighter, more so that Denilson.<br />
      <br />
      I know Arshavin is having a rough time, but how many times did he just give up yesterday when something didn't work? There was one passage of play where he was lying on the ground after a pass
      went astray and he just lay there. He wasn't injured and could have helped win the ball back just outside their box, but he just lay there watching. Halfway into the second half, heads went
      down and it was Man U in the Champions League all over.<br />
      <br />
      How many times did you see players just drop their arms by their sides and stop moving when a pass went astray? It's like we don't know how to cope when the passes aren't perfect. Where did
      that go? Are they so perfect in training now that they no longer think they will hit a stray pass?<br />
      <br />
      Do we need to buy in January? Without a doubt, but it is a keeper we need, not a forward. With or without VP we were always going to hit a dry spell, it's only natural. Almunia might have made
      a good save yesterday, but how many bread and butter balls should he have come for that he didn't? How many times did he just throw the ball back to Chelsea? And as for the free kick? What the
      fuck is the point of setting up a wall if you are then going to anticipate (wrongly) and move behind it to get beat by some distance by a free kick which was not as fierce as it could have been
      and was well inside the post on the side the keeper was supposed to be protecting? We need a keeper who can command the WHOLE area, Almunia couldn't even command the sun to rise in the
      morning.<br />
      <br />
      With Almunia in goal we will not win anything. It is that simple. He was always average, but this season, he isn't even that. I've said it for weeks, months even, he just doesn't seem
      interested. Put Fabianski in, hell put Mannone in, at least then we can say 'inexperience' and 'they'll learn instead of 'what the fuck' or 'where the fuck is he?' Almunia is a number two and
      should NEVER be any more. No wonder Jens hated him, I'd hate him too if I'd somebody that crap constantly thinking they deserved my place.<br />
      <br />
      Nasri needs to come in to the centre more, why couldn't he have played in there with Cesc with Rosicky out wide? Why did we start Eduardo when we have seen his form is lacking and Vela or Theo
      would have created a lot more problems for their back four? Why did we keep pumping high ball after high ball into their box when we have the collective height of a group of midgets? Where was
      our movement off the ball? That isn't down to VP, that's down to the team. Where we scared? We didn't start like we were.<br />
      <br />
      It reminded me of a grown up with their hand on the head of a kid who is swinging punches but just can't reach the adult. Chelsea just let us swing and flail, and then picked us off when we
      were tired or out of ideas.<br />
      <br />
      Do I think that our title challenge is over? Not at all. Chelsea play Man City next week so that's a draw and two points dropped. Other teams, teams like Sunderland and Bolton, physical teams,
      will take points off this Chelsea team, and you can be dam sure United will go all out to beat them after the way they lost to Chelsea. Normally, I'd put in that we still have to play them as
      well, but that's a moot point, there always seems to be a team we just can't beat. At the minute that's Chelsea so there's no point in even counting that match. However, the team that wins the
      most points among the mini top 4 league is very rarely the team that wins the league. Ask Liverpool last year, or us the year before. Chelsea are only one team, and while I know it comes on the
      back of a defeat against Sunderland, you have to know that we are also one of the few teams that can go on a long unbeaten run. If we hit a 21 run like we did after we lost to Man City last
      November, I defy anyone to tell me we won't be there or thereabouts come May. This team is stronger than the team who did that last season, so that gives me hope.<br />
      <br />
      Perhaps, because I'm sick (again ffs) I am not feeling the pain. I know I did turn the TV off before the final whistle and that isn't like me at all. I was disgusted, not with losing, but with
      losing when we shouldn't yet again. We can't say we didn't turn up, we did, though we mightn't have hung around for the full 90.<br />
      <br />
      Where do we go from here?<br />
      <br />
      Watching Wenger's post match conference he looked a very depressed man, and so he should be. He said the call on the goal which was disallowed was huge, and it was. To make it 2-1 would have
      turned everything. And he was right that they got everything, when Mikel was finally booked the ref told him it was because he had made five fouls, each one of them worse that the one Traore
      committed which earned him a yellow card in the first quarter of the match. He also mentioned that we could see the damage done to the confidence from the result against Sunderland was much
      greater than he had thought. That isn't good enough. These are highly paid professionals. They should have confidence which is stronger than that of a petrified flea.<br />
      <br />
      Shell shocked is maybe a word for how he looked.<br />
      <br />
      People will make comparrisons with last year, but this time last year we had lost five not four, and let's not forget Chelsea have already lost two as well. This is our 'blip' and if we can
      stop it becoming a 'slide' we can shake November off and push on. Injuries, the ACN and suspensions will take their toll on Chelsea and United as they have taken their toll on us. We need to
      just start putting the ball in the back of the net again, and we should start that against Man City, even though Wenger says he will still play the kids at Eastlands and I fear for them.&nbsp;
      Perhaps it will be a case of having to start the unbeaten run after another defeat to Man City. This time it won't cost us points, thankfully. But what would a thumping defeat on top of this
      result against Chelsea, heaped on the defeat at Sunderland do to morale at the club?<br />
      <br />
      Blah, I know this blog is all over the place, that's the way my head is. I'll announce the winner of the competition later when I get a chance to have a proper look at the entries.<br />
      <br />
      That's all I feel like saying today. I'm sure you know the feeling.
    </p>
    <p>
      Bring on December...death to November!
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-11-30 02:00:06</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Nerves at the ready - Arsenal/Chelsea is almost here]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/nerves-at-the-ready---arsenalchelsea-is-almost-here"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Fucking typical, Frank 'I'm a chav' Lampard goes to see the placenta doctor and comes back fully fit earlier than expected. Van Persie goes and ends up being out six months instead of six
      weeks.&nbsp; To be fair to VP, I don't think he acted against medical advice, and judging by Arsenal's statement they place the blame firmly at the feet of the Dutch FA and their medical staff
      for misdiagnosing the injury. In fact, that's what I originally thought, until ClownshoeVanClubfoot (formerly EduardoisInnocent) pointed out that it took VP a full 8 days to return to the club
      (why the club didn't insist he returned immediately I have no idea).
    </p>
    <p>
      And some of you mocked me for this:
    </p>
    <p>
      <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;rd=1&amp;item=200405377374&amp;ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT"><img src="http://www.gaygirlsguide.co.uk/ebay/images/ashburton_grove_medical_centre" height="480" width="480" /></a>
    </p>
    <p>
      I didn't include this in yesterday's log as I'd wrote it the night before and didn't know. I'm kinda glad I didn't know, as it would have taken some of the shine off my new-found
      optimism.<br />
      <br />
      So, with all this, we are now being written off as title contenders before a ball has been kicked against Cheslea and to be honest I'm fucked if I care. Nobody really took us seriously as
      contenders this season anyway, most paying lip service simply because we are sitting in the top four. I, on the other hand, think that it won't set us back anywhere near as much as the loss of
      Rooney would set back Man United. They are a one-man team, we are most definitely not.<br />
      <br />
      But then again, with Man U things are different. Such as how they complain that they should have had a penalty against Besiktas, my god how they moaned, and it wasn't even a 'stonewaller.' Moan
      on Wednesday, moan on Thursday, hell let's moan some more on Friday and then see what happens. What happens? They get TWO penalties against Portsmouth. Two. In one game when we can't even get
      ONE in four months despite having players GBH'd in the box. I haven't seen the calls as I write this, and I could go and find them but they might be perfectly legit penalties in which case my
      wrath would not be warranted and after seeing how much money I lost in my wages from being sick I very much want to be wrathful.<br />
      <br />
      Seriously, how many penalties were given yesterday? And how many will we be denied today?<br />
      <br />
      Logic dictates that we should actually be getting considerably MORE than other teams given the amount of intricate play we do in and around the box and how quick our players are for many of the
      defenders in this league. Is that the problem? Are our players just to quick for the refs as well? Or are we paying the price for our fabricated reputation? I think it's a bit of both.<br />
      <br />
      Sepp Blatter has finally been kicked in the head by a donkey (well, you explain it) and has now said that he IS in favour of goal-line technology. It's all very well and good, and I'll be
      interested to see how far he takes it, but as Arsenal never have any problems with goal-line decisions (it's the penalties we never get) it means feck all to Arsenal at the minute so I'll come
      back to that another time.<br />
      <br />
      Oh aye, isn't there a match today?<br />
      <br />
      There's still no word on Gallas, and we are still none the wiser as to if we'll see Eboue or Traore at left-back. Do you play the guy with experience, even though that means playing him out of
      position, or the youngester who finds the left a much-more natural friend? We forget the experience Traore gained at Portsmouth, and while that might make the difference, it's still no
      substitute for Gibbs or Clichy. Whoever plays there we just have to hope they get a lot of help from the rest of the defense and left-side midfield.<br />
      <br />
      There isn't really anything more I can say that hasn't been repeated ad nauseum already. Many fans think this is 'must win' some think it's 'can't lose' and most people, outside Arsenal, who
      are supposed to be 'in the know' don't give us a chance.<br />
      <br />
      Personally, yesterday's optimism aside, I think it'll be whoever manages to get the luck and the ref's calls. Will he allow Chelsea to bully us beyond the laws of the game? If so then we will
      struggle. If we get a ref who has some balls then we have a chance.<br />
      <br />
      But first and foremost, we need to turn up. We need to be the Arsenal who went to both Manchester clubs, but this time convert our chances and kick Drogba (as if he was the ex-25) before he
      gets a chance to pretend he's been kicked and win a dangerous free.<br />
      <br />
      This one really could go any way...<br />
      <br />
      With the power of our collective will, we can make it go ours....a hattrick from Cesc wouldn't hurt either!<br />
      <br />
      (If you are fed up with the coverage of the Arsenal Chelsea match, there's a really touching article <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1231737/Arsenal-star-Alexandre-Song-I-wish-Dad-watch-play.html">here about Alex Song</a>, and I just think the guy rocks.)<br />
      <br />
      Last chance to enter the TShirt competition which closes at midnight tonight....with only a few people choosing to enter, you have every chance of being the lucky punter to pick up the Tshirt
      shown below.
    </p>
    <p>
      You can win a large <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=200406772993">'Let's Talk About Cesc' Tshirt</a> (click on the link to have a look at it in more detail).
      Not exactly an Arseblog-style pair of tickets to the Chelsea match, but hey, it's free...
    </p>
    <p>
      <b>So far, as I said above, there's only been a few entries (I'm choosing to believe that everyone is taking their time over their entries rather than no-one's interested/reading) so you have
      great odds of winning....</b>
    </p>
    <p>
      <img src="http://www.gaygirlsguide.co.uk/ebay/images/lets_talk_about_cesc_tshirt" height="400" width="400" />
    </p>
    <p>
      Unlike most competitions though, this one will require a tiny bit of skill.
    </p>
    <p>
      So, to win (and you can enter as many times as you like), simply send your ideas for what would make the perfect Arsenal Tshirt to <a href="mailto:info@ladyarse.com?subject=TSHIRT%20COMPETITION">info@ladyarse.com</a>. It would help if you could put 'TSHIRT COMPETITION' in the subject line (or click the email address above and
      that'll do it for you).
    </p>
    <p>
      It can be about Arsenal club, players past and/or present, or slagging off any other player or team in the league, the topic is open. Basically, it only has to be a TShirt an Arsenal fan would
      love to wear.<br />
      <br />
      The winner will be announced in the first blog after the Chelsea game, and please note that by entering you're giving me permission to use your ideas to make a TShirt/TShirt
      transfer...well...you didn't think I was doing it TOTALLY free did you?<br />
      <br />
      So let's be having your ideas then...<a href="mailto:info@ladyarse.com?subject=TSHIRT%20COMPETITION">info@ladyarse.com</a> and it would be appreciated if they could be in English as I'm an
      ignorant fool&nbsp;
    </p>
    <p>
      Midnight tonite folks....get them in before then!
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-11-29 05:42:56</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[Diamond Cutters At The Ready - Why Arsenal CAN Beat Chelsea]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/diamond-cutters-at-the-ready---why-arsenal-can-beat-chelsea"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Listening to Fans Forum last night (I didn't bother entering the competition this week as A. I couldn't afford the flights to the match if I'd won the pair of tickets to the Chelsea match and
      B. I didn't think they'd let me win two weeks in a row, though I did briefly consider entering under a false name until I remembered A.) when&nbsp; a very good point was made which gave me
      added hope for Sunday. In fact, by the time I had finished this blog, it had given me faith, a starting point to see a way through the machine that has become Chelsea.
    </p>
    <p>
      I shall get to that in a minute. First, I'll let you into my thinking as to how the game was going to go prior to hearing it so you can see why I needed something, anything to sway the
      balance.<br />
      <br />
      When I thought about what the final result on Sunday would be, I just didn't know. I genuinely didn't have a clue. There was a teeny tiny part of me that dared to hope, kept shouting 3-1 3-1
      3-1. It dared to dream that we could do again what we did at Stamford Bridge last season. But the bigger part of me remembered, painfully, what they did to us at the Emirates. We haven't lost
      at home, in fact, we've won every match, that has to be a good sign right? But then those sort of runs have to come to end at sometime. I was basically being schitzophrenic about the whole
      thing.<br />
      <br />
      So much depends on the back four, will Gallas play? Who'll play left-back? Eduardo, Vela or Theo through the middle? Will Almunia remember he's playing a competitive match or think he was out
      for a stroll with his pink dog again? Will Drogba do to our centre-backs what he normally does or will the Verm keep him in his pocket for the 90, only occassionaly punching him behind the
      ref's back? What about Anelka, you know he likes to score against us, if the Verm has Drogba and Gallas isn't playing, will he be left to Butternut? Will Arshavin steal the show like he did
      when he first arrived or will he be quiet as he has been for much of the season? Which Arsenal will turn up? Can our defense hold more than theirs? Will 4-3-3 blunt the diamond or will they
      simply cut through our heart?<br />
      <br />
      So many questions. And I just didn't have any answers. The only thing I knew was that it wouldn't be dull.<br />
      <br />
      Then I heard the fan on Arsenal TV. I wish I could remember his name and give him the credit for one of the smartest things I've heard in a long time (I apologise if someone has already raised
      this point and I missed it).<br />
      <br />
      Cheslea, as we all know, have adopted a diamond formation this season. The diamond, as we also know, is a European formation and not one you are likely to see deployed in England unless it's by
      a visiting European team. So, it's no surprise then, that they are blowing teams away, afterall, these teams, for the majority, have never faced such a contraption as the diamond. How on earth
      do they cope? But hang on you say, what about Villa and Wigan? They beat Chelsea, and Man U should have. What do those three teams have that the others didn't? Experience in Europe. That's what
      (Wigan may not as a club, but their manager most certainly does). You might be thinking they dispatched Liverpool with aplomb and Liverpool have heaps of European experience, but seriously, who
      isn't beating Liverpool these days? And especially in a 'European' setting.<br />
      <br />
      With this thought, my belief that we could get a result increased 10-fold. And off my mind went.
    </p>
    <p>
      Chelsea might be 'blowing teams away' but quite a few results have also come by the skin of their diamond-studded teeth. Both their losses came away from home, and, as Wenger has pointed out
      more than once, we have played two more away games than they have, with a game in hand to boot.<br />
      <br />
      We don't have RVP or Super NIk to torture Chelsea's centrebacks, and that might actually turn out to be to our advantage. Terry &amp; Co. like a big man to mark, they'd prefer power over pace
      and movement given that they themselves move like tractors.<br />
      <br />
      In Vermaelen and Gallas we have a centre-back pairing that can handle anyone when they are on top of their game. No Gallas? Then we have a natural leader in the Verminator who will hopefully
      haul his counterpart into line. Perhaps we'd see Song in there beside the Verm, what a pairing that could be. TV5 can take Anelka and his pace and Song can just stick to Drogaba so tight that
      he has no need to get off the ground and win an aerial ball. Denilson can sit and protect and then use his small ankles to splay that ball around the park to set us on our way. Nasri, who has
      become quite the tackler, in the middle beside Cesc, Arshavin on one side, Rosicky on the other, and Eduardo/Vela/Theo through the middle.
    </p>
    <p>
      Almost makes you drool doesn't it? Suddenly the fear is leaving me but no doubt it'll be back between now and the end of the match.
    </p>
    <p>
      People might discuss what we may or may not be lacking up front, the doubts might be looming large over left-back and the potential centre-back pairing, but for me, our biggest concern is
      Almunia. Will Chelsea have noticed that he hasn't a clue and if you shoot, generally, he'll dive too early or too late? Can we stop them getting near him? Don't be stupid, off course we can't.
      But that's ok. We need to learn to accept our defensive frailties, embrace them, make them our own and then they cannot hurt us. Acknowledge where we are weak but know that where we are strong
      can more than compensate. It's all very new-agey, but it saves heart attacks.
    </p>
    <p>
      Embrace the fact that we will only keep one clean sheet in 10, but only if you embrace the fact that we are scoring more goals than anyone else ever has in Premier League (short) history. Did
      we care that Henry couldn't head a ball for shit and therefore could not be seen as a 'complete' centre forward? Did we fuck, we knew what he could do with his feet more than covered for what
      he couldn't do with his head and we loved him for it, hell, we usually had a laugh when he tried a header. This is what I propose we do with our defence. I don't know why we suck at the back,
      Almunia aside, the individual components of our defense are exceptional. So perhaps all the balme does lie with the keeper. I don't know, but what I do know is that we can't do anything about
      it so why worry?
    </p>
    <p>
      At the start of the season I said we'd have to score more than we let in, and I keep bringing it up because I don't often get things so spot on. Our season, as we have seen, is about scoring
      more than we concede and we have no reason to think that will change on Sunday. Or for the rest of the season. For that reason, we have to do what we do best, and that is all out attack - try
      and get as many as we can before our defence cracks. And let's remember, no team keeps the ball better than us, and there's fuck all their diamond can do if it hasn't got the ball.<br />
      <br />
      I also now fancy us to break our duck when it comes to not scoring in the first 15 minutes of a match this season.<br />
      <br />
      I read on <a href="/blogs/cesc-is-god">Jamrockrovers</a> blog that Wilshere is a doubt for Man City due to an ankle injury (I was watching the match and it was a shocking tackle) and Merida
      will be banned (given that the match was being filmed by one man with him camera-phone Arsenal TV didn't really capture the incident but the commentators seemed very firm in their belief that
      not only had Delph been the instigator he had also grabbed Merida by the throat in a much more threatening manner than what Fran was being sent off for, even though they didn't say what that
      was, just for reacting) it gives Le Boss the perfect excuse to slip in two more experienced midfielders. I really hope he does. While I absolutely love seeing the kids in the Carling Cup, Man
      City will be fielding a top side and I simply don't want to see them humiliated. But more on that after we get Chelsea sorted out. Bit of a tangent I know, but the tackle on Wilshere just
      popped into my head as I was running through all the players and options we have for Sunday.<br />
      <br />
      Back to that.<br />
      <br />
      Sky and the Redtops will tell you that Sunday is do or die for Arsenal. Many will even try and tell you that even should Arsenal beat Chelsea all that will do is open the door for Man U and let
      then slip through as we eventually fade. Don't let them fool you.<br />
      <br />
      Our title challenge does not depend on the result against Chelsea, though a win would be fantastic, and no loss is ideal, it would be far from the end of us in this league campaign. Wenger will
      have a fair idea how many points will be needed to win the league, and he will revise that figure as every week passes and teams lose unexpectedly. It doesn't matter where we get those points,
      just that we get them.<br />
      <br />
      Wenger has also stated, quite categorically, that this team's time has come. There can be no more hiding behind youth and inexperience. He isn't asking us to wait any more. He believes, and he
      is promising, that this team WILL deliver this season.<br />
      <br />
      We've trusted and believed in him this far, why should we do any different now?<br />
      <br />
      Arsene knows, and he says we can beat Chelsea.<br />
      <br />
      That's good enough for me.
    </p>
    <p>
      And that's your lot for today, all that remains today then is to remind you of the competition which will be running until midnight after the Chelsea game. You can win a large <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=200406772993">'Let's Talk About Cesc' Tshirt</a> (click on the link to have a look at it in more detail). Not exactly an Arseblog-style
      pair of tickets to the Chelsea match, but hey, it's free...
    </p>
    <p>
      <b>So far, there's only been a few entries (I'm choosing to believe that everyone is taking their time over their entries rather than no-one's interested/reading) so you have great odds of
      winning....</b>
    </p>
    <p>
      <img src="http://www.gaygirlsguide.co.uk/ebay/images/lets_talk_about_cesc_tshirt" height="400" width="400" />
    </p>
    <p>
      Unlike most competitions though, this one will require a tiny bit of skill.
    </p>
    <p>
      So, to win (and you can enter as many times as you like), simply send your ideas for what would make the perfect Arsenal Tshirt to <a href="mailto:info@ladyarse.com?subject=TSHIRT%20COMPETITION">info@ladyarse.com</a>. It would help if you could put 'TSHIRT COMPETITION' in the subject line (or click the email address above and
      that'll do it for you).
    </p>
    <p>
      It can be about Arsenal club, players past and/or present, or slagging off any other player or team in the league, the topic is open. Basically, it only has to be a TShirt an Arsenal fan would
      love to wear.<br />
      <br />
      The winner will be announced in the first blog after the Chelsea game, and please note that by entering you're giving me permission to use your ideas to make a TShirt/TShirt
      transfer...well...you didn't think I was doing it TOTALLY free did you?<br />
      <br />
      So let's be having your ideas then...<a href="mailto:info@ladyarse.com?subject=TSHIRT%20COMPETITION">info@ladyarse.com</a> and it would be appreciated if they could be in English as I'm an
      ignorant fool&nbsp;
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-11-28 02:10:45</updated></entry><entry><title type="html"><![CDATA[When you can&#039;t be the best...slag the best off]]></title><link href="http://www.oleole.com/blogs/ladyarse/posts/when-you-can039t-be-the-bestslag-the-best-off"/><content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
      Typical of Roy Keane eh? After sounding somewhat sensible last week in the aftermath of 'Henry-gate' he has decided to have a dig at the Arsenal manager and the behaviour of Arsenal under
      Wenger.&nbsp; For what reason? Only Keane and his shrink can answer that.
    </p>
    <p>
      He even has a pop at Wenger for not really having a right to comment on Henry's handball as he's not Irish. Yes, Roy, he's not Irish, well done, but he is French, you know, the OTHER team who
      were involved in the play-off.
    </p>
    <p>
      Idiot.
    </p>
    <p>
      And all this from a man who has admitted he deliberately set out (and suceeded) to break a fellow players leg for a foul committed on him some time before. Can you say that about ANY of the
      Arsenal players who have played at the club in the entire time Wenger has been there?
    </p>
    <p>
      When you can't be one of the big boys, I suppose the next best thing is to have your name written beside them by slagging them off.
    </p>
    <p>
      Class as always.
    </p>
    <p>
      Pot, kettle, wanker springs to mind. <a href="http://goal.com/en/news/1132/frenchmen-abroad/2009/11/27/1651294/ipswich-town-boss-roy-keane-blasts-arsenals-conduct-under-arsene-">Read for
      yourself here.</a>&nbsp;
    </p>]]></content><updated>2009-11-27 11:25:31</updated></entry></feed>