Monday, 10 March 08, 11:42 AM

I think that ManU would be in a better place than Liverpool if Ronaldo, or Tevez or Rooney were not in the line up. I really think that Torres is more valuable to Liverpool than Ronaldo or Rooney are to ManU. ManU has three guys that are absolute quality up front so if one of them misses a match the other two can pick it up. But if Liverpool does not have Torres I don't think that Kuyt or Crouch can replace Mr. Torres.
I take your point about Utd having three match winners compared to Liverpool's two in Torres and Gerrard. Hopefully Babel will make it 3 for Liverpool if he continues to improve next season. But statistically Ronaldo has been more important to Utd by scoring 36% of their 58 league goals than Torres has by scoring 35% of our 53 goals.
I like Babel a lot more than Kuyt. Kuyt just does not belong in a team like Liverpool. And Torres just keeps on scoring. I think he's truly one of the best in the world right now.
It was indeed a superb strike SM. I hope he can repeat it against your crew when we visit the emirates in a few weeks time.
Kuyt does a job for us. He's a decent crosser and has good movement. He was poor v Inter but has been playing well in the past 6 or 7 games. But he's not a world beater and I would imagine that he'll be replaced in the summer.
8 Comments
Where do you think Liverpool would be without Torres? I don't think Dirk Kuyt would be scoring hat tricks every other match.
I don't think he would either but I don't know how relevant it is to ask where we would be without Torres. It's like asking where Utd would be without Ronaldo, Arsenal without Adebayor etc.