Tuesday, 15 January 08, 11:01 PM
G14 hasn't gone away,
of course. That would, obviously, be asking too much. It's more, well, a change of strategy. Since its foundation in 2000, G14 has taken something of a "bull in a china shop" approach to its
politicking, getting itself involved in needless court cases with one sole aim - creating a European legal precedent that would make them more money. The crassness of their involvement in the
Charleroi vs FIFA case was staggering - here was G14, explicitly setting its sights on the governors of the world game, and using a small, provincial, Belgian club to do so. They barely even
bothered with the pretence of caring about Charleroi. This was all about making money out of FIFA.
There is a cogent case to be made that the clubs should be given a share of the money that the confederations make from the likes of the World Cup and the European Championships. These are
the people that pay the wages of the players that the international associations take away, use, make a profit from and occasionally return in pretty bad condition. The FA has a compensation
package which covers the wages of players that get injured on international duties. However, it is limited to £50,000 per week, and a number of the players in the England squad earn considerably
more than that. In the case of, say, Michael Owen, it was less than half of his wages being paid by the FA for the months and months that he was out injured after the 2006 World Cup.
The flip side to this argument is somewhat more nuanced. It's entirely plausible to argue that clubs depend on the international game as much as the international set up depends upon the club
game. The renaissance in English football came, not from Sky TV, no matter how much they might want you to believe it. They didn't get properly involved until 1992. In that respect, they were
bandwagon jumpers. The renaissance started with the 1990 World Cup and the ending of English clubs' exile in Europe. People started going back to their clubs off the back of a renewed interest that
was engendered by England's performance in Italy and when they got there, they found that it wasn't as bad as it had been. The effects of The Taylor Report were starting to kick in, and the
facilities were starting to be improved.
All of this, though, is history. The game has moved on considerably since the early 1990s, and the clubs (and, in particular, the wealthy and powerful clubs) are in a stronger position than
they ever have been before. However, international football still creates better "occasion" football than club football. The Champions League final is the biggest thing that club football has to
offer, yet the TV audience in Britain for it will usually be less than for an England match of any significance. The response of the broadcasters has been telling. If you sit and watch a Champions
League match on the television, you are constantly reminded how great it will be if the English clubs are successful, but I suspect that less and less people are falling for this line, now. This
line serves the broadcasters very nicely. It pushes the patriotic button and (and this is crucial, as far as the broadcasters are concerned) creates interest amongst the neutrals. If you strip the
neutrals away from the Champions League, the audiences would lousy. They play the same trick now on the international matches, but the base audience is bigger to start with.
Ultimately, G14 was outflanked by Michel Platini, and they were left with little choice but to re-group and re-organise. For the time being, Platini has got them onside and, for the first
time in the best part of a decade, there's a chance that peace might actually break out within European football. I'd watch my back, though, if I was him.
Like this blog? Help spread the word:
Tuesday, 15 January 08, 10:51 PM
Well, considering that it was such a badly kept secret, the sacking of Sam Allardyce from Newcastle United is
still something of a surprise, thanks in no small part to the fact that it is such a staggeringly stupid decision, and is such a staggeringly stupid decision on so many
levels. Amazing. There seems to be no extent that the directors of that club won't go to in order to make their club a laughing stock but, whereas I would normally express my sympathy to the poor,
down-trodden supporters of the club concerned, I can do no such thing this time, because Newcastle's supporters have been wholly complicit in this whole, ridiculous affair. The biggest complaints
coming from St James Park over the last few weeks have come from the terraces (regarding the quality of football that Newcastle have been playing), from people who seem singularly incapable of
accepting Newcastle's place in the new world order of English football.
I mean, and I ask this question in all seriousness, who are they going to get that is any better? Allardyce is no great favourite of mine (you'd noticed?), but the
idea of getting a better manager, barely half-way through the season, with a team in "turmoil" (as the tabloid press would call it), seems to be the sort of leap of
imagination that would normally be reserved largely for people that one might describe as "mentally interesting". Harry Redknapp is the bookmakers' favourite, but why would he want to decamp from his
home on the south coast and the good work that he is doing at Portsmouth? Why would Mark Hughes want to leave Blackburn to try and sort this mess out when he's building a decent team (albeit one that
can't do anything in the cups) at Blackburn? No Premier League manager that is any good is going to go there. It's a managerial graveyard. I asked a Newcastle supporter the other week this simple
question: when was the last time that a Newcastle manager went on to a better job having managed Newcastle? His answer was Gordon Lee, who went from St James Park to Everton in 1977. In other words,
it's over thirty years since a Newcastle manager was deemed to have succeeded sufficiently to have a better offer made to them. Looking down the bookmakers' lists must make dispiriting reading for
Newcastle supporters. Alan Shearer is the second favourite (primarily because he has made noises that he would like the job, in spite of having no managerial experience whatsoever), and then you're
down to the likes of Martin Jol, Terry Venables and Tony Mowbray. This is the problem with replacing your manager after Christmas - no-one in a decent job is going to want to take over your club if
it's in a mess.
This decision isn't a nightmare from a purely footballing point of view, although it doesn't make any sense in this respect. Newcastle are in eleventh place in the Premier League at the moment,
which is about their average league place over the last three or four years, or so. Allardyce's time at Newcastle, therefore, hasn't been successful, by any stretch of the imagination, but it hasn't
been a disaster either. Off the pitch, it's going to be expensive for Newcastle. Such was their faith in him when they offered him the job that they allowed him to bring in a massive back-room staff
(I've seen the number of people quoted as thirty-two). There's a good chance that the vast majority of them may have to go, too. The bill could run to tens of millions of pounds, if they were all on
contracts that were several years long.
I'm inclined to think that Shearer is the ghost that Newcastle have to get out of their system. He's going to be mentioned, completely without merit, in comparison with every manager that
Newcastle have until they get around to taking him on. They might be best off taking him on now and giving him until the end of the season to see if he's any good or not. I happen to think that I
might already know the answer to this question, but I might be wrong, and the alternative might just turn out to be David O'Leary.
Like this blog? Help spread the word:
Friday, 15 December 06, 02:42 PM
I don't know. Maybe Barca fans are just used to this sort of thing, week in week out. On this sort of showing, though, there surely can be no stopping them in the final of the World Club Cup on Sunday and, as I said below, Inter must be absolutely cacking themselves at the thought if having to line up against this lot in just three days time. Not, of course, that you'd have had the slightest inkling of any of this if you'd just got to the stadium in time for Frank Rijkaard's post-match press conference. Now, here's a man that talks a lot, and says very little. Here's a couple of sample comments for you: "Our changing room is filled with positive energy and everyone is working towards the same goal". "We have a disadvantage in the final through Inter having been out here longer than us". "We are not afraid of anyone, but Inter come from the country where football was born". You'd think that his team had just scrambled a goalless draw on a wet Sunday night in La Coruna rather than that his team had just utterly outplayed the opposition in the semi-finals of the World Club Championship. Truly, he is a master of understatement.
Let's take a look at those three quotes again. Maybe something was lost in the translation, but all of them, I think, deserve closer inspection. "Our changing room is filled with positive energy and everyone is working towards the same goal". Well, one would hope so. If you can't be positive after a 4-0 win in a cup semi-final, when can you be? The same goes for "working towards the same goal". I'm struggling to see what alternative there could be, here, unless Deco and Ronaldinho are in direct competition to see who can pull off the most outrageous piece of skill ever seen on a football pitch. "We are not afraid of anyone, but Inter come from the country where football was born". Well, for one thing, I would take issue with Brazil being the country of football's birth, obviously (point taken, Frankie, but the game was well into its adolescence before the Brazilians got completely involved), but also... "not afraid"? Really? A wealth of talent that borders on the obscene, and they're not afraid of anyone? I'd sack their psychologist if they were. Finally: "We have a disadvantage in the final through Inter having been out here longer than us". Ah, the old favourite. Making out that the other team have an enormous advantage because they've been here for forty-eight hours longer than you. An almost Ronaldinho-esque body swerve there from Frank. If they lose on Sunday... it's all the fault of jet lag! We were tired! Well, I'm not buying that. Not that I think that such an excuse will be necessary. Inter looked out of sorts last night, and I'd be unsurprised if Barca did the sort of damage to them that they did to Club America this evening.
Of course, football being football, this could all come back to bite me on the backside on Sunday night. Barca's players could all fall asleep on the pitch here through jet lag, allowing Inter a chance to at least take the match to extra-time. On the basis of what I've seen so far, though, the others should make the most of the free time between now and the final, because Sunday night seems likely to be the Ronaldinho and Deco Show.
Like this blog? Help spread the word:
Thursday, 14 December 06, 09:31 AM
The competition proper starts today. I'll kick off by apologising for the lack of activity on here yesterday, but the jet lag hit me like a tidal wave, and I was unable to function for most of the day. Today, however, I'm fully recovered and able to post. again, I'm at The Olympic Stadium in Tokyo, and later on I'll be posting up my thoughts on this evening's semi-final between Ahly SC and SC Internacional later on. It is, I have to say, the match that I've been looking forward to the most. Two open, attacking sides, each with plenty of flair players. It promises to be a most absorbing evening.
With two semi-finals coming up, you might be forgiven for thinking that we're approaching some sort of climax here in Japan, but the truth of the matter is that things are only just warming up. With the fifth/sixth and third/fourth place play-offs to follow, we're not even a third of the way through the entire schedule and, in saying this, I'm hitting at the key issue in problems that FIFA have had with the selling of this tournament. At the moment, the World Club Cup is suffering from an image problem. It's kind of understandable, given that none of our teams are taking place, but the silence over this competition from the English press is deafening. The fact of the matter is that the World Club Cup is currently neither fish nor fowl. The set up, with six teams - one from each of the FIFA confederations - taking part is unsatisfactory. But I'm not here to be cynical. As I know that Sepp Blatter religiously reads this blog (who else could all those hits from Geneva be coming from?), I'm going to offer some of my patented brilliant advice on how to make the World Club Cup work.
Now, I don't think that I have to argue that football needs a World Club Championship. It needs it because there is a lot of fantastic football in the world. Europe may think it's the best, and it's certainly (in terms of revenue, if nothing else) the biggest, but that's not really enough, is it? I couldn't give two damns for these lists which show what clubs bring in the most money each year, and how much their overall turnover is. If this is all that matters, they might as well dispense with the football altogether, open up department stores and we can replace the league tables with the FTSE 100 Share Index. Where it counts is on the pitch. Football is a global game, and it needs a global tournament. We have the World Cup, of course, but most of us put our allegiance to our club team before our allegiance to our national team. Our club team is the bread and butter of our existence. We should have a global club tournament so that we can say with a degree of authority who is the best. We don't have that at the moment, because the tournament in it's current format doesn't carry the required weight. If Barcelona lose against Ahly SC or in the final, it won't be the end of their world. They'll return to Catalunya and resume their battle to become the champions of Europe again. The big European clubs have had a fairly dismal record in this competition since it started, so it needs to be changed to bring them onside.
The ideal World Club Cup needs to be played in the summer. There are, it seems to me, tournaments every summer at the moment, but there are still spaces in the calendar which it can be played. If we take it as read that the three big international competitions are the World Cup, the European Championships and the Copa America, then there is a spare summer that can be used. The tournament needs to be bigger. Sixteen teams should be sufficient - five from Europe, four from South America, two from Central and North America, two from Africa, two from Asia and one from Oceania. The tournament should be rotated around the world, rather than kept in one country. Much as I like Japan (and they are doing an excellent job of hosting this tournament), it makes sense for it to be played at times that are convenient for European television audiences. FIFA may need to take a small loss on it for a while too, in order to ensure that the potential earnings from it for the competing teams is high enough for them to sit up and take an interest.
There is no reason why this can't be a success. The world's appetite for football is insatiable. To say that the introduction of a World Club Cup is over-saturation is, frankly, hogwash - the sort put forward by big European clubs who want the Champions League to be the be-all-and-end-all, because they're in prime place at the trough at that tournament. I don't care about them. I want these so-called "big" European clubs to stand up and be counted. I want them to come to tournaments like this one and perform. Being the best in the world should matter them, because it sure as hell matters to the Brazilians - something which is borne out by the previous results on this tournament.
For now, though, we have what we have, and it's great. Of course it is. Whether it's Internacional fans singing themselves hoarse at Schiphol Airport a full five days before their team was due to be involved at all, or Club America's Rojas using a part of his anatomy to score a goal which most coaches and players use merely to speak out of - and I can't help but think that the tournament will start to heat up now. The cynics are missing out.
Like this blog? Help spread the word:
On Baker and Kelly Offline