Tuesday, 04 November 08, 01:19 PM · Comments(2)
I've just read the latest comments from Arsene Wenger regarding the game at Stoke and, as is often the case, there is a just argument in there somewhere but it will always get lost in the British media because of the point of the attack. As with other statements he's made in the past (often after a Bolton game!!) the attack will be perceived as an unjust and vile attempt by this foreign manager (who's bloody French for Christ's sake) to get rid of the blood and guts of the good old English game (see this blog for the typical reaction).
In fact I'm convinced he makes these comments for two reasons, one is the pure frustration of losing a game and the fact he lingers over the defeat (these comments are often made 2 or 3 days after the event). The second and more just complaint is that certain players, he believes, make rash and unjustifiable physical challenges on Arsenal players. The problem with this second and valid point is that of proving it to a public who have brainwashed by the media with the "look at how many red cards his teams have" and "he never sees anything when it's his player" campaigns that may have started with rumour but are now perceived as fact. I once delved through the records to look at our red card record and over his first 10 years Arsenal had about the 6th or 7th BEST disciplinary record but the the press never let facts get in the way of a story. On the other point he makes it easy for the media because he does come out with some ludicrous excuses sometimes and, as a result, his good points are missed, never heard or ignored.
Let's just take the challenge on Adebayor on Saturday, the Stoke player did him with a studs up slide on his ankle OFF THE F##KING PITCH and didn't even concede a foul (the ball had long gone out for a throw) never mind a booking, yet neither this challenge or the one on Walcott were discussed on MOTD. Yet in the same game the petulance of Van Persie (and it was f##king stupid) is given a red card. Now I'm not excusing the Dutchman but where's the justice in that.
What I would like Arsene to do is to come to a press conference in a less emotional state of mind and categorically state that he has no problem with sides being physical (a la Bolton /Stoke) within the LAWS of the game but he would just like refs to actually punish (or maybe the FA on video evidence) clear and deliberate fouling (aka Kevin Nolan's "it's all right to give Walcott a kick" comments).
The other galling point is that he's the most friendly to the media of most of the managers, he always makes himself available (unlike Old fergie) to the press, will answer any question thrown at him, give his opinion and won't eff and blind at reporters when they say the wrong thing (oh that's you again fergie) to him. Of course he makes stupid comments, of course he defends his players when they shouldn't be defended and of course he makes excuses sometimes but then which manager doesn't.
2 Comments · Add yours
Well put. Every fan of football should be outraged by the overly aggressive tactics used by numerous players/teams in the EPL. It is not just Arsenal who suffer from the injustice and often injuries that are perpetrated by these thugs. The argument put forth by proponents of this style of "play", ie: British football is meant to be played rough and borderline criminal, is detrimental to the game and only serves to dilute the talent by requiring teams to play "down" to a lower level of skill and a higher level of brutality. No wonder so many clubs are unable to raise their status in the league as they pursue a more physical rather than skillful style of play. Any gain is shortlived. One only need look at teams such as Blackburn, Bolton et al.. to see that pain does not equal gain. Hull is showing that skill has a much bigger impact than physicality in raising performance and results. Even Roy Keane has a firm grasp of reality as he guides Sunderland.
Injured players do not help the league. Football is not a sport centered around "proving how hard you are". Leave that to the Rugby lovers.
Unfortunately Arsene is up against a British mentality that prefers to dismiss his comments as those of a lightweight foreigner, while Fergie is seen as a tactician or "master of the head game" when he pleads for protection for his players.
Ultimately it requires Arsene to revise his approach...not to the game, but to the press, as you have stated. However, Wenger is a man of principles and perhaps that is a revision he will not be able to make.
Good post. Maybe he should make himself less available to the press and only answer pre arranged questions. That should make the criticism stop. It worked for Fergie. By the way didn't Basle do well tonight.